Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between earthquake magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph network (II): Surface wave magnitude

  • Published:
Acta Seismologica Sinica

Abstract

By using orthogonal regression method, a systematic comparison is made between surface wave magnitudes determined by Institute of Geophysics of China Earthquake Administration (IGCEA) and National Earthquake Information Center of US Geological Survey (USGS/NEIC) on the basis of observation data collected by the two institutions between 1983 and 2004. A formula is obtained which reveals the relationship between surface wave magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph network. The result shows that, as different calculation formulae and observational instruments are used, surface wave magnitude determined by IGCEA is generally greater by 0.2 than that determined by NEIC: for M=3.5∼4.5 earthquakes, it is greater by 0.3; for M=5.0∼6.5 earthquakes, it is greater by 0.2; and for M≥7.0 earthquakes, it is greater by no more than 0.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CHEN Pei-shan. 1982. Review of earthquake magnitude [J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 3(3): 14–19 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • GUO Lü-can and PANG Ming-hu. 1981. Surface-wave magnitude of earthquakes and its station correction [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 3 (3): 312–320 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B. 1945a. Amplitude of surface waves and magnitudes of shallow earthquakes [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 35: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B. 1945b. Amplitudes of P, PP and S magnitude of shallow earthquakes [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 35: 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • HE Xiao-qun and LIU Wen-qing. 2001. The Applications of Regression Analysis [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 31–39 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kárnĭk V, Kondorskaya N V, Riznichenko Y V et al. 1962. Standardization of the earthquake magnitude scale [J]. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, (6): 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter C F. 1935. An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 25: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • XU Shao-xie. 1994. General Ruler for Earthquake Magnitude (GB17740–1999) [S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 1–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Foundation item: Project “Seismic Data Share” from China Ministry of Science and Technology.

Contribution No. 06FE3004, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration.

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Rf., Chen, Yt., Bormann, P. et al. Comparison between earthquake magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph network (II): Surface wave magnitude. Acta Seimol. Sin. 19, 1–7 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-001-0001-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-001-0001-y

Key words

CLC number

Navigation