Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Linguistic and Philosophical Analysis of Emic and Etic and their Use in International Business Research

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine ways in which cross-cultural research in international business can use emic–etic approaches more effectively. The majority of research conducted in the field has been etic, while the cross-cultural data used by the researchers have been emic in nature. This resulted in producing ethnocentric results which are biased towards Western perspectives. We call for a re-evaluation of the importance of in-depth qualitative analysis in international business research. We go back to the origins of emic and etic in linguistics and conduct a linguistic and philosophical analysis of these terms to demonstrate that the emic–etic distinction is not helpful for adequately studying cross-cultural data. We provide examples from linguistics, kinship, and from international business research on German-Polish acquisitions. We demonstrate that what conventional etic cross-cultural research perceives to be a problem is often an opportunity to gain deep insight. We find that emic matters in some cases more that etic, and that the emic can often add value beyond the etic. We conclude that a research strategy employing emic and etic approaches is a vital step to enable cross-cultural researchers to obtain more adequate and meaningful results. While most of researchers have treated emic and etic as dichotomous, we demonstrate the benefits of treating them as complementary approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N. J. (1983). A typology of management studies involving culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardener, E. (1971a). Social anthropology and language, introduction to social anthropology and language. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardener, E. (1971b). The new anthropology and its critics. Man, 6(3), 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardener, E. (1989). The voice of prophecy and other essays. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P. (2008). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. M. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: theory, models, and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Chapman, M. (1997). The use of ‘native categories’ in management research. British Journal of Management, 8(3), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M. (1992). The Celts: the construction of a myth. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M. (1996/1997). Social anthropology, business studies and cultural issues. International Studies of Management and Organisation, 26(4), 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M., Clegg, J., & Gajewska-De Mattos, H. (2004). Poles and Germans: an international business relationship. Human Relations, 57(8), 983–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M., Gajewska-De Mattos, H., Clegg, J., & Buckley, P. J. (2008). Close neighbours and distant friends: perceptions of cultural distance. International Business Review, 17(3), 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. P., & Li, S. (2005). Cross-national differences in cooperative decision-making in mixed-motive business contexts: the mediating effect of vertical and horizontal individualism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), 622–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Iribarne, P. (1997). The usefulness of ethnographic approach to international comparison of organisations. International Studies of Management and Organisation, 26(4), 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. R., Jaccard, J. J., Triandis, H. C., Morales, M. L., & Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1976). Cross-cultural model testing: toward a solution of the etic–emic dilemma. International Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique generale. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. (2011). Qualitative research for international business (perspective). Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 582–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C. (2006). Leading cultural research in the future: a matter of paradigms and taste. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 922–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haire, M., Ghiselli, E., & Porter, L. (1966). Managerial thinking: an international study. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfrich, H. (1999). Beyond the dilemma of cross-cultural psychology: resolving the tension between etic and emic approaches. Culture and Psychology, 5(2), 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herodotus (1972). The histories. Translated by A. de Selincourt (Revised Edition). London: Penguin.

  • Hjelmslev, L. (1943). Omkring sprogteoriens grundlaeggelse. Copenhagen: Munksgaard (translated 1963 by J. Whitfield, Prolegomena to a theory of language. Menasha: University of Wisconsin).

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organisations: software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Griffith, D. A., Finnegan, C. A., Gonzalez-Padron, T., Harmancioglu, N., Huang, Y., Talay, M. B., & Cavusgil S. T. (2008). Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1027–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPA (1949). Principles of the international phonetic association. London: International Phonetic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (1964). The history and meaning of the term ‘phoneme’. London: International Phonetic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, N., Tsang, E. W. K., & Begley, T. M. (2005). Cronyism: a cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. G., Holdsworth, D. K., & Mather, D. W. (2007). Country-of-origin and choice of food imports: an in-depth study of European distribution channel gatekeepers. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. (1961). Rethinking anthropology. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., Bhagat, R., Buchan, N., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. (2005). Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1962). Le totemisme aujourd’hui. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (translated as Totemism, 1963a, by R. Needham. Boston: Beacon Press).

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, Y., Floyd, S. W., & Baldridge, D. C. (2005). Toward a model of issue-selling by subsidiary managers in multinational organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonner, W. J. (1999). Helfrich’s ‘principle of triarchic resonance’: a commentary on yet another perspective on the on-going and tenacious etic–emic debate. Culture and Psychology, 5(2), 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. (1989). We are not French! Language, culture and identity in Brittany. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgement. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 1781–1796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, R. (1962). Structure and sentiment. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. (1973). Phonetics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, D. (1982). Semantic anthropology. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader-member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 264–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, T. K., Peterson, M. F., & Shyi, Y.-P. (1991). Quantitative methods in cross-national management research: trends and equivalence issues. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(2), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. F., & Pike, K. L. (2002). Emics and etics for organizational studies: a lesson in contrast from linguistics. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 2(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. F., & Quintanilla, S. A. R. (2003). Using emics and etics in cross-cultural organizational studies: universal and local, tacit and explicit. In D. Tjosvold et al. (Eds.), Cross-cultural management: foundations and future.

  • Pike, K. (1954, 1955, 1960). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. Glendale: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

  • Qi, X. (2011). Face: a Chinese concept in a global sociology. Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. (1967). A short history of linguistics. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U. (1983). Methodological and theoretical issues and advancements in cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. M., Ozanne, J. L., & Saatcioglu, B. (2008). An interpretive examination of the development of cultural sensitivity in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Yeheskel, O. (2008). From “distance” to “friction”: substituting metaphors and redirecting intercultural research. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 905–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics, R. R., Penz, E., & Ghauri, P. N. (2008). Enhancing the trustworthiness of qualitative research in international business. Management International Review, 48(6), 689–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Styles, C., Patterson, P. G., & Ahmed, F. (2008). A relational model of export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 880–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, H. (1877). Handbook of phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H., & Berry, J. (1980). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: methodology (Vol. 2). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Tung, R. L. (2007). The cross-cultural research imperative: the need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usunier, J.-C. (2009). Language as a key input in investigating conceptual equivalence in cross-cultural management research. Paper presented at the workshop on language and multilingualism in management: themes, concepts and methodologies, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, June 2009.

  • Usunier, J.-C., & Lee, J. A. (2013). Marketing across cultures (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E. (2002). On the discursive construction of success/failure in narratives of post-merger integration. Organization Studies, 23(2), 211–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. Applied social research methods series (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S., & Zaheer, A. (2006). Trust across borders. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for International Business, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Peter J. Buckley, Malcolm Chapman, Jeremy Clegg & Hanna Gajewska-De Mattos

Authors
  1. Peter J. Buckley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Malcolm Chapman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeremy Clegg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hanna Gajewska-De Mattos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Gajewska-De Mattos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buckley, P.J., Chapman, M., Clegg, J. et al. A Linguistic and Philosophical Analysis of Emic and Etic and their Use in International Business Research. Manag Int Rev 54, 307–324 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-013-0193-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-013-0193-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation