Abstract
The binding problem—question of how information between the modules of the linguistic system is integrated during language processing—is as yet unresolved. The remarkable speed of language processing and comprehension (Pulvermüller et al. 2009) suggests that at least coarse semantic information (e.g. noun animacy) and syntactically-relevant information (e.g. verbal template) are integrated rapidly to allow for coarse comprehension. This EEG study investigated syntax–semantics interface processing during word-by-word sentence reading. As alpha-band neural activity serves as an inhibition mechanism for local networks, we used topographical distribution of alpha power to help identify the timecourse of the binding process. We manipulated the syntactic parameter of verbal event structure, and semantic parameter of noun animacy in reduced relative clauses (RRCs, e.g. “The witness/mansion seized/protected by the agent was in danger”), to investigate the neural bases of interaction between syntactic and semantic networks during sentence processing. The word-by-word stimulus presentation method in the present experiment required manipulation of both syntactic structure and semantic features in the working memory. The results demonstrated a gradient distribution of early components (biphasic posterior P1–N2 and anterior N1–P2) over function words “by” and “the”, and the verb, corresponding to facilitation or conflict resulting from the syntactic (telicity) and semantic (animacy) cues in the preceding portion of the sentence. This was followed by assimilation of power distribution in the α band at the second noun. The flattened distribution of α power during the mental manipulation with high demand on working memory—thematic role re-assignment—demonstrates a state of α equilibrium with strong functional coupling between posterior and anterior regions. These results demonstrate that the processing of semantic and syntactic features during sentence comprehension proceeds in highly integrated fashion using gating of attentional resources to facilitate rapid comprehension, with attentional suppression of global alpha power to facilitate interaction of local networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clifton C Jr, Traxler MJ, Taha Mohamed M, Williams RS, Morris RK, Rayner K (2003) The use of thematic role information in parsing: syntactic processing autonomy revisited. J Mem Lang 49(3):317–334
Daneman M, Carpenter PA (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 19(4):450–466
Ferreira F, Patson ND (2007) The ‘good enough’approach to language comprehension. Lang Linguist Compass 1(1–2):71–83
Grewe T, Bornkessel I, Zysset S, Wiese R, Yves von Cramon D, Schlesewsky M (2006) Linguistic prominence and Broca’s area: the influence of animacy as a linearization principle. Neuroimage 32(3):1395–1402
Haegens S, Osipova D, Oostenveld R, Jensen O (2010) Somatosensory working memory performance in humans depends on both engagement and disengagement of regions in a distributed network. Hum Brain Mapp 31(1):26–35
Hahne A, Friederici A (1999) Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. J Cogn Neurosci 11(2):194–205
Haupt FS, Schlesewsky M, Roehm D, Friederici AD, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I (2008) The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture. J Mem Lang 59(1):54–96
Hirotani M, Makuuchi M, Rüschemeyer SA, Friederici AD (2011) Who was the agent? The neural correlates of reanalysis processes during sentence comprehension. Hum Brain Mapp 32(11):1775–1787
Jackendoff R (2007) A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Res 1146:2–22
Jensen O, Mazaheri A (2010) Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition. Front Hum Neurosci 4:186
King J, Kutas M (1995) Who did what and when? Using word-and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. J Cogn Neurosci 7(3):376–395
Klimesch W (1997) EEG-alpha rhythms and memory processes. Int J Psychophysiol 26(1–3):319–340
Kratzer A (2004) Telicity and the meaning of objective case. In: Guéron J, Lecarme J (eds) The Syntax of time. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 389–424
Kuperberg GR, Kreher DA, Sitnikova T, Caplan DN, Holcomb PJ (2007) The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Lang 100(3):223–237
Lai G, Mangels JA (2007) Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage. Neuropsychologia 45(9):2038–2050
Levin B (1993) English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation. University of Chicago press
Luck SJ, Kappenman ES (2011) ERP components and selective attention. In: The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components, p 295
MacGregor LJ, Pulvermüller F, van Casteren M, Shtyrov Y (2012) Ultra-rapid access to words in the brain. Nature commun 3:711
Malaia E (2014) It still isn’t over: event boundaries in language and perception. Lang Linguist Compass 8(3):89–98
Malaia E, Carnes T (in press) Improving reading strategy for comprehension: does recall compete with working memory manipulation? J Edu Human Dev
Malaia E, Newman S (in press) Neural bases of event knowledge and syntax integration in comprehension of complex sentences. Neurocase. doi:10.1080/13554794.2014.989859
Malaia E, Wilbur RB (2011) Motion capture signatures of telic and atelic events in ASL predicates. Lang Speech 55(3):407–421
Malaia E, Wilbur RB, Weber-Fox C (2009) ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences. Brain Lang 108(3):145–158
Malaia E, Wilbur RB, Weber-Fox C (2012) Effects of verbal event structure on online thematic role assignment. J Psycholinguist Res 41(5):323–345
Malaia E, Wilbur RB, Weber-Fox C (2013a) Event end-point primes the undergoer argument: a look at neurobiological bases of event structure. In: Gehrke B, Arsenijevic B (eds) Subatomic semantics of event predicates. Springer, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, pp 231–248
Malaia E, Wilbur RB, Milković M (2013b) Kinematic parameters of signed verbs. J Speech Lang Hear Res 56(5):1677–1688
Malaia E, Gonzalez-Castillo J, Weber-Fox C, Talavage TM, Wilbur RB (2014) Neural processing of verbal event structure: temporal and functional dissociation between telic and atelic verbs. In: Mandouilidou C, de Ameida R (eds) Cognitive science perspectives on verb representation and processing. Springer, Lausanne, pp 131–140
Nakano H, Saron C, Swaab TY (2009) Speech and span: working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension. J Cogn Neurosci 22(12):2886–2898
Neville H, Nicol J, Barss A, Forster K, Garrett M (1991) Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 3(2):151–165
Newman S, Malaia E, Seo R, Hu C (2013) The effect of individual differences in working memory capacity on sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Brain Topography 26(3):458–467
Obleser J, Weisz N (2012) Suppressed alpha oscillations predict intelligibility of speech and its acoustic details. Cereb Cortex 22(11):2466–2477
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113
Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ, Swinney DA (1994) Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 20(4):786
Pulvermüller F, Shtyrov Y, Hauk O (2009) Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain Lang 110(2):81–94
Ramchand GC (2008) Verb meaning and the lexicon: a first phase syntax. Cambridge University Press, vol 116
Recchia G, Jones MN (2009) More data trumps smarter algorithms: comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis. Behav Res Methods 41(3):647–656
Renault B, Ragot R, Lesevre N, Remond A (1982) Onset and offset of brain events as indices of mental chronometry. Science 215(4538):1413–1415
Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Doppelmayr M, Pecherstorfer T, Freunberger R, Hanslmayr S (2005) EEG alpha synchronization and functional coupling during top-down processing in a working memory task. Hum Brain Mapp 26(2):148–155
Townsend DJ, Bever TG (2001) Sentence comprehension: the integration of habits and rules. MIT Press, Cambridge, vol 1950
Voytek B, Canolty RT, Shestyuk A, Crone NE, Parvizi J, Knight RT (2010) Shifts in gamma phase–amplitude coupling frequency from theta to alpha over posterior cortex during visual tasks. Front Hum Neurosci 4:191
Weckerly J, Kutas M (1999) An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology 36(5):559–570
Wolff S, Schlesewsky M, Hirotani M, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I (2008) The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: electrophysiological evidence from Japanese. Brain Lang 107(2):133–157
Yamada Y, Neville HJ (2007) An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences. Brain Res 1130(1):167–180
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malaia, E., Newman, S. Neural bases of syntax–semantics interface processing. Cogn Neurodyn 9, 317–329 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-015-9328-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-015-9328-2