Abstract
The progressive increase in numbers of noninvasive cardiac imaging examinations broadens the spectrum of knowledge radiologists are expected to acquire in the management of drugs during CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and cardiac MR (CMR) to improve image quality for optimal visualization and assessment of the coronary arteries and adequate MR functional analysis. Aim of this review is to provide an overview on different class of drugs (nitrate, beta-blockers, ivabradine, anxiolytic, adenosine, dobutamine, atropine, dipyridamole and regadenoson) that can be used in CTCA and CMR, illustrating their main indications, contraindications, efficacy, mechanism of action, metabolism, safety, side effects or complications, and providing advices in their use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336
Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732
Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144
Marano R, De Cobelli F, Floriani I et al (2009) Italian multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the negative predictive value of 16- and 64-slice MDCT imaging in patients scheduled for coronary angiography (NIMISCAD-Non Invasive Multicenter Italian Study for Coronary Artery Disease). Eur Radiol 19:1114–1123
Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS et al (2008) 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 94:1386–1393
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A et al (2020) 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41(3):407–477
Srichai MB, Hecht EM, Kim D et al (2009) Dual-source computed tomography angiography image quality in patients with fast heart rates. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:310–311
Sabarudin A, Sun Z (2013) Beta-blocker administration protocol for prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography. World J Cardiol 5(12):453–458
Ignarro LJ, Napoli C, Loscalzo J (2002) Nitric oxide donors and cardiovascular agents modulating the bioactivity of nitric oxide: an overview. Circ Res 90(1):21–28
Takx RAP, Suchá D, Park J, Leiner T, Hoffmann U (2015) Sublingual Nitroglycerin Administration in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 25(12):3536–3542
Thadani U, Rodgers T (2006) Side effects of using nitrates to treat angina. Expert Opin Drug Saf 5(5):667–674
Ahmad S (1991) Nitroglycerin and intracranial hypertension. Am Heart J 121:1850–1885
Chun EJ, Lee W, Choi YH et al (2008) Effects of nitroglycerin on the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(1):86–92
Kang DK, Noh HW, Park KJ, Choi SY (2007) Assessment of the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography: effect of sublingual administration of nitroglycerin. J Korean Radiol Soc 56:127–135
McParland P, Nicol ED, Harden SP (2010) Cardiac drugs used in cross-sectional cardiac imaging: what the radiologist needs to know. Clin Radiol 65(9):677–684
Pannu HK, Alvarez W, Fishman EK (2006) Beta-blockers for cardiac CT: a primer for the radiologist. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6 Suppl 2):S341–S345
Takakuwa KM, Halpern EJ, Gingold EL, Levin DC, Shofer FS (2009) Radiation dose in a “triple rule-out” coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64- MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(4):866–872
Bastarrika G, Thilo C, Headden et al (2009) Cardiac CT in the assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(2):397–409
Maffei E, Palumbo AA, Martini C et al (2009) “In-house” pharmacological management for computed tomography coronary angiography: heart rate reduction, timing and safety of different drugs used during patient preparation. Eur Radiol 19(12):2931–2940
Degertekin M, Gemici G, Kaya Z et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of patient preparation with intravenous esmolol before 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Coron Artery Dis 19(1):33–36
Shapiro MD, Pena AJ, Nichols JH et al (2008) Efficacy of prescan beta-blockade and impact of heart rate on image quality in patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography. Eur J Radiol 66(1):37–41
Roberts WT, Wright AR, Timmis JB, Timmis AD (2009) Safety and efficacy of a rate control protocol for cardiac CT. Br J Radiol 82(976):267–271
Mahabadi AA, Achenbach S, Burgstahler et al (2010) Safety, efficacy, and indications of beta-adrenergic receptor blockade to reduce heart rate prior to coronary CT angiography. Radiology 257(3):614–623
Singh J, Daftary A (2008) Iodinated contrast media and their adverse reactions. J Nucl Med Technol 36(2):69–74
Elliott WJ, Ram CVS (2011) Calcium channel blockers. J Clin Hypertens Greenwich Conn 13(9):687–689
Nicol ED, Arcuri N, Rubens MB et al (2008) Considerations when introducing a new cardiac MDCT service. Avoiding the pitfalls. Clin Radiol 63(4):355–369
Koruth JS, Lala A, Pinney S, Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR (2017) The clinical use of Ivabradine. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(14):1777–1784
Celik O, Atasoy MM, Ertürk M et al (1987) Single dose ivabradine versus intravenous metoprolol for heart rate reduction before coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients receiving long-term calcium channel-blocker therapy. Acta Radiol 55(6):676–681
Ohana M, Sellers SL, Mooney J et al (2018) Prevalence and impact of scan-related anxiety during coronary CT angiography: a prospective cohort study of 366 patients. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12(5):364–371
Di Cesare E, Cademartiri F, Carbone I et al (2013) Clinical indications for the use of cardiac MRI. By the SIRM Study Group on Cardiac Imaging. Radiol Med 118:752–798
Marano R, Natale L, Chiribiri A et al (2015) Cardiac MR perfusion imaging: where we are. Radiol Med 120:190–205
Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV et al (1990) Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation 82(5):1595–1606
Fenster MS, Feldman MD, Camarano G et al (1997) Correlation of adenosine thallium 201 perfusion patterns with markers for inducible ischaemia. Am Heart J 133:406–412
Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD et al (2013) Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:91
Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M et al (1994) Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 23(2):384–389
Kobori M, Shida K, Negishi H, Masuda Y, Hosoyamada A (1991) Evaluation of dopamine and dobutamine for use in circulatory depression associated with induced total spinal block. Masui 40(2):190–201
Ruffolo RR Jr (1987) The pharmacology of dobutamine. Am J Med Sci 294(4):244–248
Vallet B, Dupuis B, Chopin C (1991) Dobutamine: mechanisms of action and use in acute cardiovascular pathology. Ann Cardiol Angeiol 40(6):397–402
Iskandrian AS, Verani MS, Heo J (1994) Pharmacologic stress testing: mechanism of action, hemodynamic responses, and results in detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 1(1):94–111
Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W et al (1999) Non invasive diagnosis of ischaemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 99(6):763–770
Wellnhoffer E, Olariu A, Klein C et al (2004) Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to scar quantification for the prediction of functional recovery. Circulation 109(18):2172–2174
Takase B, Nagata M, Kihara T et al (2004) Whole-heart dipyridamole stress first pass myocardial perfusion MRI for the detection of coronary artery disease. Jpn Heart J 45:475–486
Bodi V, Sanchis J, Lopez-Lereu MP et al (2007) Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(12):1174–1179
Kazmirczak F, Nijjar PS, Zhang L et al (2019) Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 21(1):9
Johnson SG, Peters S (2010) Advances in pharmacologic stress agents: focus on regadenoson. J Nucl Med Technol 38(3):163–171
Leaker BR, O’Connor B, Hansel TT et al (2008) Safety of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist for myocardial perfusion imaging, in mild asthma and moderate asthma patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Nucl Cardiol 15:329–336
Thomas GS, Tammelin BR, Schiffman GL et al (2008) Safety of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled trial (regcopd trial). J Nucl Cardiol 15:319–328
Zhao G, Messina E, Xu X et al (2007) Caffeine attenuates the duration of coronary vasodilation and changes in hemodynamics induced by regadenoson (CVT-3146), a novel adenosine A2A receptor agonist. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 49:369–375
Funding
Not applicable
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rovere, G., Meduri, A., Savino, G. et al. Practical instructions for using drugs in CT and MR cardiac imaging. Radiol med 126, 356–364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01261-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01261-4