Skip to main content
Log in

“ALL Faculty Should Take this”: a Universal Design for Learning Training for Community College Faculty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This design case details the design and development of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Academy, a two-phase training to guide community college faculty in applying the UDL framework to their instruction. This article focuses on the first phase, in which faculty were trained in UDL. The authors of this paper, who were the creators and instructional designers of the UDL Academy, guided faculty as they analyzed their instructional practices through the lens of the UDL framework and designed revisions to their courses. Based on faculty participant responses to the first UDL Academy post-training questionnaire, changes were made to the training when it was offered a second time. Participant responses to a questionnaire after the second UDL Academy indicated these changes improved the training. Suggestions for implementing a similar training at other institutions are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Americans with Disabilities Act. (ADA). (2009). Definition of disability. 42 § U.S.C. 12102 C.F.R.

  • Bailey, T. R., Jeong, D. W., & Cho, S.-W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges [electronic version]. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T. R., Jaggars, S. S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America's community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerstaff, S., & Cormier, M. S. (2015). Examining faculty questions to facilitate instructional improvement in higher education [electronic version]. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology [electronic version]. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgstahler, S. E. (2013). Preface. In S. E. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: Promising practices. Seattle: DO-IT, University of Washington Retrieved January 30, 2019, from www.uw.edu/doit/UDHE-promising-practices/preface.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgstahler, S. E., & Moore, E. (2015). Impact of faculty training in universal design of instruction on the grades of students with disabilities. In S. E. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: Promising practices. Seattle: DO-IT, University of Washington Retrieved January 29, 2019, from http://www.uw.edu/doit/UDHE-promising-practices.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. M., Brawer, F. B., & Kisker, C. B. (2013). The American Community College. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2012). Improved lesson planning with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) [electronic version]. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412446178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. L., Schelly, C. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning intervention in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 26(3), 195–220 Retrieved August 10, 2017, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1026883.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize Universal Design for Learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL [electronic version]. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change [electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change [electronic version]. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A., & Streagle, K. (2014). Engaging pre-service teachers in experiencing Universal Design for Learning principles in a college classroom. Paper presented at the UDL-IRN Summit, Johns Hopkins University Columbia Center, Columbia, MD.

  • Izzo, M. V., Murray, A., & Novak, J. (2008). The faculty perspective on Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 21(2), 60–72 Retrieved December 13, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ822094.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langley-Turnbaugh, S. J., Whitney, J., & Blair, M. (2013). Increasing accessibility of college STEM courses through faculty development in Universal Design for Learning. In S. E. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: Promising practices. Seattle: DO-IT, University of Washington Retrieved January 29, 2019, from www.uw.edu/doit/UDHE-promising-practices/college_stem.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. (2005). Beyond faculty development: How centers for teaching and learning can be laboratories for learning [electronic version]. New Directions for Higher Education, 2005(131), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory & Practice. http://udltheorypractice.cast.org. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.

  • Murray, J. P. (2002). The current state of faculty development in two-year colleges [electronic version]. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2002(118), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Disability and Social Security Administration. (2000). Transition and post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities: Closing the gaps to post-secondary education and employment. Washington, DC. Retrieved January 30, 2019, from https://ncd.gov/rawmedia_repository/c19e795f_e7da_4628_a673_86e2d0c6f951.pdf.

  • Ok, M. W., Rao, K., Bryant, B. R., & McDougall, D. (2017). Universal Design for Learning in pre-K to grade 12 classrooms: A systematic review of research [electronic version]. Exceptionality, 25(2), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A review of research on universal design educational models [electronic version]. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, R. A., & Valadez, J. R. (2016). Democracy, multiculturalism, and the community college. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. D., Park, H. J., Brown, S., & Cook, B. (2011). Universal design for instruction in postsecondary education: A systematic review of empirically based articles. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 24(1), 5–15 Retrieved January 30, 2019, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941728.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romiszowski, A. (1981). Designing instructional systems. London: Kogan Page Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelly, C., Davies, P. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2011). Student perceptions of faculty implementation of Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 24(1), 17–30 Retrieved August 10, 2017, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941729.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, F., Baker, J. N., Harris, A. A., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Browder, D. M. (2007). Effects of training in Universal Design for Learning on lesson plan development [electronic version]. Remedial and Special Education, 28(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280020101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stes, A., Min-Leliveld, M., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). The impact of instructional development in higher education: The state-of-the-art of the research [electronic version]. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, T. J., & Behling, K. T. (2018). Reach everyone, teach everyone: Universal Design for Learning in higher education. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, R. (2007). Universal design across the curriculum [electronic version]. New Directions for Higher Education, 2007(137), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Preparation of this item was fully funded by the United States Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy under Cooperative Agreement No. OD-26453-14-75-4 -36 ($4,772,418).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher D. Hromalik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Christopher D. Hromalik is employed by Onondaga Community College, the college under study. He is also the Faculty Coordinator and a founding member of the Universal Design for Learning Academy, the program under study.

William N. Myhill was, at the time the Universal Design for Learning Academy was offered, the Director of Onondaga Pathways to Careers, the project that provided funding for the Universal Design for Learning Academy, which is the program under study. He is also a founding member of the Universal Design for Learning Academy, the program under study.

Nancy R. Carr is employed by Onondaga Community College, the college under study. She is a founding member of the Universal Design for Learning Academy, the program under study.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hromalik, C.D., Myhill, W.N. & Carr, N.R. “ALL Faculty Should Take this”: a Universal Design for Learning Training for Community College Faculty. TechTrends 64, 91–104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00439-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00439-6

Keywords

Navigation