Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cloud-Based M-Learning in a University Context: Student-Teachers’ Perspectives on the Development of their Own Reflective Thinking

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prospective teachers should be able to increasingly reflect on their own profession, so teacher education programmes need to find new ways to foster and implement the opportunities for reflective thinking development during both academic and training activities. This pilot study was focused on the possibilities offered by mobile devices and hybrid environments to support and improve these processes. The overall aim of the study was how to connect theory and practice and how they can support each other in a virtuous circle, whilst the specific research question was related to the contribution of mobile devices within this relationship: how can cloud-based m-learning facilitate student-teachers’ reflective thinking? The Department of Education at the University of Genoa (Italy) designed a mixed method model indicating the actions to be carried out at university, at school and during the reflection periods. Two questionnaires, composed of closed and open-ended questions, were administered to student-teachers to underline if and how the mobile devices affected the reflection levels. The quantitative and qualitative analysis shows how mobile devices can support the development of pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking during an educational training path carried out between the lectures at university and teaching practice at school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandru, B., Nicolae, T., & Loredana, M. (2013). Cloud-based mobile learning. Informatica Economica, 17(2), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ally, M. (Ed.). (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubusson, P., Griffin, J., & Kearney, M. (2012). Learning beyond the classroom: Implications for school science. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), The second international handbook of science education (pp. 1123–1134). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Burden, K., & Kearney, M. (2016). Future scenarios for Mobile science learning. Research in Science Education, 46(2), 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-S., Chen, S.-Y., Yu, K.-C., Chu, Y.-H., & Chien, Y.-H. (2017). Effects of cloud-based m-learning on student creative performance in engineering design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2008). Ubiquitous learning: An agenda for educational transformation. In proceedings of the 6th international conference on networked learning (Halkidiki, 5-6 may), p. 567-582.

  • Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, D. R. (1985). Models for the preparation of America’s teachers. Bloomington, Indiana: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos, B., & Demir, S. (2013). The analysis of the blogs created in a blended course through the reflective thinking perspective. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1335–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymoke, S., & Harrison, J. (2008). Reflective teaching and learning: A guide to professional issues for beginning secondary teachers (developing as a reflective secondary teacher). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardoun, H. M., Lopez, S. R., Alghazzawi, D. M., & Castillo, J. R. (2012). Education system in the cloud to improve student communication in the institutes of: C-learniXML++. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1762–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Jackson, C. (1997). Preparing professionals: Student teachers and their supervisors at work. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Johnson, M., Alves, G. R., Minović, M., & Conde-González, M. Á. (2014). Informal learning recognition through a cloud ecosystem. Future Generation Computer Systems, 32, 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, P. S. C., & Matthews, B. (2011). Listening to the concerns of student teachers in Malaysia during teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonen, S. I. K. (2016). A study on reflective reciprocal peer coaching for pre-service teachers: Change in reflectivity. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(7), 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, G. A., & Reeves, J. L. (2016). Online professional development embedded with mobile learning: An examination of teachers' attitudes, engagement and dispositions. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., Dymoke, S., & Pell, T. (2006). Mentoring beginning teachers in secondary schools: An analysis of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1055–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking skills: Descriptions of their students’ thinking and interpretations of their teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. S., Mims-Cox, J. S., & Doyle-Nichols, A. (2006). Developing portfolios in education: A guide to reflection, inquiry, and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Martín, S. (2013). Technology outlook for STEM+ education 2013–2018: An NMC horizon project sector analysis. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Lim, E. (2014). Investigating the structural relationship among perceived innovation attributes, intention to use and actual use of mobile learning in an online university in South Korea. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 427–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. S., Rupley, W. H., Sparks, J., & Holcomb, A. (2007). Comparing traditional journal writing with journal writing shared over E-mail list serves as tools for facilitating reflective thinking: A study of pre-service teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(3), 357–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-J., Lee, J.-M., & Rha, J.-Y. (2017). Understanding the role of user resistance on mobile learning usage among university students. Computers & Education, 113, 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, M. A. (2003). The web portfolio guide: Creating electronic portfolios for the web. New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). Design for mobile and wireless technologies. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for the digital age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-J. (2005). Understanding and assessing pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 699–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Hsu, C. N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees' intentions to use e-learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, M., & Toikkanen, T. (2016). Mobile apps for reflection in learning: A design research in K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 184–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limone, P. P. (2012). Ambienti di apprendimento e progettazione didattica. Proposte per un sistema educativo transmediale. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G., Fu, D., Zhu, J., & Dasmalchi, G. (2009). Cloud computing: IT as a service. IT Professional, 11, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., Wen, M., Jou, M., & Wu, D. (2014). A cloud-based learning environment for developing student reflection abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, L. (2016). Transformation of teacher practice using mobile technology with one-to-one classes: M-learning pedagogical approaches. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 883–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2016). Effects of reflection type in the here and now mobile learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 932–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, P. F., Alemanne, N. D., Mendenhall, A., Maurya, M., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., & Schellinger, J. (2013). Scientific inquiry, digital literacy, and mobile computing in informal learning environments. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 407–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milrad, L. (2003). Mobile learning: Challenges, perspectives, and reality. In K. Nyiri (Ed.), Mobile learning: Essayes on philosophy, psychology and education (pp. 151–164). Wien: Passagen Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mircea, M. (2012). SOA adoption in higher education: A practical guide to service-oriented virtual learning environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei, F., Phang, F. A., & Kashefi, H. (2014). Assessing and improving reflective thinking of experienced and inexperienced teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 633–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, T., & Beswick, K. (2007). Stimulating reflection on practice: Using the supportive classroom reflection process. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 8, 74–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M., & Kujundzic, N. (2005). Critical reflection: A textbook for critical thinking. Québec, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. A., & Soloway, E. (2011). Learning and schooling in the age of mobilism (pp. 3–10). November–December: Educational technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oner, D., & Adadan, E. (2011). Use of web-based portfolios as tools for reflection in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(5), 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2010). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachler, N., Cook, J., & Bachmair, B. (2012). Appropriation of mobile cultural resources for learning. In D. Parsons (Ed.), Refining current practices in mobile and blended learning: New applications (pp. 10–30). Hershey (PA): IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2013). A socio-cultural frame for mobile learning. In Z. Berge & L. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 35–46). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimmer, C., Brühlmann, F., Odetola, T. D., Oluwasola, D. O., Dipeolu, O., Ajuwon, A. J. (2019). Facilitating professional mobile learning communities with instant messaging. Computers & Education, 128, 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radulescu, S. A. (2013). A perspective on e-learning and cloud computing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1084–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranieri, M., & Pieri, M. (2014). Mobile learning. Dimensioni teoriche, modelli didattici, scenari applicativi. Milano: Unicopli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. A., & Kelley, B. (2007). Developing reflective thought in pre-service educators: Utilizing role-plays and digital video. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(2), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savran, A. (2008). Professional development of pre-service biology teachers through reflective thinking. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University.

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, S., Kearney, M., & Burden, K. (2017). Exploring mobile learning in the third space. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2012). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China, 3(5), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorfuzzaman, M., Alelaiwi, A., Masud, M., Hassan, M. M., & Hossain, M. S. (2015). Usability of a cloud-based collaborative learning framework to improve learners’ experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 967-976.

  • Song, Y. (2014). Bring your own device (BYOD) for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Computers & Education, 74, 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, P. & Gupta, P. (2013, January). E-learning through cloud computing: Shaping the future of learning for learner of tomorrow. Paper presented at the 2012 International conference on information technology and management science (ICITMS 2012) proceedings, Chongqing, China.

  • Sparks-Langer, G. M., & Colton, A. B. (1991). Synthesis of research on teachers’ reflective thinking. Educational Leadership, 48, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springfield, E. (2001). Comparing electronic and paper portfolios. In B. L. Cambridge, S. Kahn, D. P. Thompkins, & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning (pp. 76–82). Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stantchev, V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Soto-Acosta, P., & Misra, S. (2014). Learning management systems and cloud file hosting services: A study on students’ acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 612–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. (2004). Designing scalable, effective mobile learning for multiple technologies. In J. Attwell & C. Savill-Smith (Eds.), Learning with mobile devices. London: Learning and skills development agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, N. (2010). Cloud computing for education: A new dawn? International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, G. L., & Wilson, A. P. (2005). Promoting reflective thinking in teachers: 50 action strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trentin, G., & Bocconi, S. (2014). The effectiveness of hybrid solutions in higher education: A call for hybrid-teaching instructional design. Educational Technology, 54(5), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing within ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, N., & Lawrence, K. (2013). Investigating the role of mobile devices in a blended pre-service teacher education program. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(3), 56–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1985). Varieties of discourse in supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B. H., Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Chia, G.,Wong, L. H., Chen,W., So, H. J., Soloway, E., & Norris, C. (2010). Deconstructing and reconstructing: Transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1504–1523.

  • Zurita, G., Baloian, N., & Frez, J. (2014). Using the cloud to develop applications supporting geo-collaborative situated learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 34, 124–137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of Genoa, Corso A. Podestà, 2, 16128, Genoa, Italy

    D. Parmigiani

  2. Educational Technology Institute, National Research Council, Via de Marini, 6, 16149, Genoa, Italy

    V. Benigno & A. Hidi

Authors
  1. D. Parmigiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Benigno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Hidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Parmigiani.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

the Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parmigiani, D., Benigno, V. & Hidi, A. Cloud-Based M-Learning in a University Context: Student-Teachers’ Perspectives on the Development of their Own Reflective Thinking. TechTrends 63, 669–681 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00412-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00412-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation