Skip to main content
Log in

TPACK: Where do we go now?

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barbour, M., Rieber, L. P., Thomas, G., & Rauscher, D. (2009). Homemade Power-Point games: A constructionist alternative to WebQuests. TechTrends 53(5),

  • Buck Institute for Education (2002). Teaching with technology:A statewide professional development program. Retrieved November 12, 2005, from http://www.bie.org/files/twtfinal.pdf

  • Cox, S. & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. Tech-Trends 53(5), 60-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK Development in Science Teaching: Measuring the TPACK Confidence of Inservice Science Teachers. TechTrends 53(5), 70-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 5-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P. & Koelher, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The Song Remains the Same: Looking Back to the Future of Educational Technology. TechTrends 53(5), 48-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of Technology Implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring Classroom Technology Use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullens, J. (1998). Validating teacher responses on instructional practice self-report surveys. Prepared for the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Research Conference, New York. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://www.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/papers/1999_118.pdf

  • Nelson, J., Christopher, A., Mims, C. (2009). TPACK and Web 2.0: Transformation of Teaching and Learning. TechTrends 53(5), 80-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Applying the concernsbased adoption model to research on computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5).

  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 9(1).

  • Retrieved May 18, 2009 from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/mathematics/article1.cfm

  • Polly, D., & Mims, C. (in press). Supporting the integration of Web 2.0 technologies in professional development programs. In T. Kidd & I. Chen (Eds.), Wired for learning: An educators guide to Web 2.0. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TPACK: Where do we go now?. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 53, 46–47 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0324-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0324-4

Navigation