Abstract
The distinction between apophatic and cataphatic listening is defined and analyzed. Apophatic listening is more or less devoid of cognitivist claims, whereas cataphatic listening involves cognition and questioning. Many of the papers in this volume are discussed along the continuum determined by these two types of listening. Haroutunian-Gordon’s claim is that every act of listening involves the listener in questioning, thus listening is solely cataphatic. We discuss apophatic listening as a limiting ideal case and conclude that not every act of listening involves a question. Though in acknowledging this limiting case we disagree with Haroutunian-Gordon’s assertion, we are indebted to her work and believe her model forms an important part of any comprehensive theory of listening.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Three of these papers, those by English, Rice, and Meadows are influenced by Deweyan thinking. Consequently, these papers establish a context that considerably respects Haroutunian-Gordon’s work, but does not provide for its complete articulation and defense. We urge the readers to examine the matter further for themselves.
References
Dewey, J. (1930/1984). Qualitative thought. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works (Vol. 5, pp. 243–262). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1938/1986). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works (Vol. 12). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Jaspers, K. (1970). Philosophy (Vol. 2, E. B. Ashton, Trans.). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Schweitzer, A. (1997). Memoirs of childhood and youth. (K. Bergel & A. R. Bergel, Trans.). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rud, A.G., Garrison, J. The continuum of listening. Learn Inq 1, 163–168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-007-0009-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-007-0009-x