Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of femoral neck cut, cable tension, and muscles forces on the greater trochanter fixation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Greater trochanter (GT) stabilization techniques following a fracture or an osteotomy are still showing high levels of postoperative complications. Understanding the effect of femoral neck cut placement, cable tension and muscles forces on GT fragment displacements could help surgeons optimize their techniques. A 3D finite element model has been developed to evaluate, through a statistical experimental design, the impact of the above variables on the GT fragment gap and sliding displacements. Muscles forces were simulating typical daily activities. Stresses were also investigated. The femoral neck cut placement had the most significant effect on the fragment displacement. Lowering it by 5 mm increased the gap and sliding fragment displacements by 288 and 128 %, respectively. Excessive cable tightening provided no significant reduction in fragment displacement. Muscle activities increased the gap and the sliding displacements for all muscle configurations. The maximum total displacement of 0.41 mm was present with a 10 mm femoral neck cut, a cable tension of 178 N, and stair climbing. Caution must be used not to over tighten the cables as the potential damage caused by the increased stress is more significant than any reduction in fragment displacement. Furthermore, preservation of the contact area is important for GT stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack RL, Butler RA (2005) Current status of trochanteric reattachment in complex total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:237–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Box G, Hunter W, Hunter J (1978) Statistics for experimenters. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bourgeois Y, Petit Y, Laflamme GY (2010) Finite element model of a greater trochanteric reattachment system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010:3926–3929

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Canet F, Duke K, Bourgeois Y, Laflamme GY, Brailovski V, Petit Y (2011) Effect of force tightening on cable tension and displacement in greater trochanter reattachment. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:5749–5752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung G, Zalzal P, Bhandari M, Spelt JK, Papini M (2004) Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading. Med Eng Phys 26:93–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke RP, Shea WD (1979) Trochanteric osteotomy: analysis of pattern of wire fixation failure and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:102–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dall DM, Miles AW (1983) Re-attachment of the greater trochanter: the use of the trochanter cable-grip system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 65:55–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Heiner AD, Brown TD (2001) Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. J Biomech 34:773–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heller MO, Bergmann G, Kassi JP, Claes L, Haas NP, Duda GN (2005) Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech 38:1155–1163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hersh CK, Williams RP, Trick LW, Lanctot D, Athanasiou K (1996) Comparison of the mechanical performance of trochanteric fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:317–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Markolf KL, Hirschowitz DL, Amstutz HC (1979) Mechanical stability of the greater trochanter following osteotomy and reattachment by wiring. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:111–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCarthy JC, Bono JV (1999) The outcome of trochanteric reattachment in revision total hip arthroplasty with a Cable Grip System: mean 6-years follow-up. J Arthroplasty 14:810–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McLean RA, Anderson VL (1984) Applied factorial and fractional designs. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Polgar K, Viceconti M, O’Connor JJ (2001) A comparison between automatically generated linear and parabolic tetrahedra when used to mesh a human femur. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 215:85–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Plausinis D, Speirs AD, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP, Oxland TR (2003) Fixation of trochanteric slide osteotomies: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech 18:856–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ritter MA, Eizember LE (1991) Trochanteric fixation by cable grip in hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:580–581

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwab JH, Camacho J, Kaufman K, Chen Q, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT (2008) Optimal fixation for the extended trochanteric osteotomy: a pilot study comparing 3 cables vs 2 cables. J Arthroplasty 23:534–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Viceconti M, Bellingeri L, Cristofolini L, Toni A (1998) A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs. Med Eng Phys 20:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Viceconti M (2005) Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. Clin Biomech 20:451–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zalzal D, Gross AE, Papini M (2006) Notching of the anterior femoral cortex during total knee arthroplasty characteristics that increase local stresses. J Arthroplasty 21:737–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvan Petit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petit, Y., Cloutier, L.P., Duke, K. et al. The effects of femoral neck cut, cable tension, and muscles forces on the greater trochanter fixation. Med Biol Eng Comput 50, 411–417 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0892-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0892-x

Keywords

Navigation