Skip to main content
Log in

The Paradoxical Negative Association between Subjective Well-Being and the Objective “Happiness Ranking” in Japan

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. The original PDF is available at: www.hosei.ac.jp/documents/koho/photo/2011/11/20111110.pdf (in Japanese).

  2. Happiness Ranking in Japan” on Youtube (in Japanese).

  3. The Japanese General Social Surveys are designed and carried out by the JGSS Research Center at Osaka University of Commerce (Joint Usage / Research Center for Japanese General Social Surveys accredited by Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology), in collaboration with the Institute of Social Science at the University of Tokyo.

  4. The variables were originally ordered from 1 signifying “very happy” to 5 signifying “very unhappy” but have been reordered so that a higher value corresponds to a higher level of happiness.

  5. While psychologists tend to make a distinction between happiness and life satisfaction, economists tend to use the terms interchangeably (Graham et al. 2004). Not surprisingly, answers to happiness and life satisfaction questions are closely correlated (Graham 2009).

  6. The result from the micro happiness equation is available upon request.

  7. I thank a referee for this suggestion.

  8. Consistent with this hypothesis, Alesina and La Ferrara (2002) find that individuals’ inclination to trust increases with the stability of the community in which they live.

  9. The Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

References

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. C., Oswald, A., Wilson, D., & Wu, S. (2011). Dark contrasts: the paradox of high rates of suicide in happy places. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 80(3), 435–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2008). Gross national happiness as an answer to the easterlin paradox? Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., MacCullock, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91(1), 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: toward a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes “The world’s happiest (and saddest) countries.” http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2011/12/07/the-worlds-happiest-and-saddest-countries/ Accessed May 16, 2012.

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, S. A., Mattey, J. P., & Wascher, W. L. (2003). Compensating differentials and evolution in the quality-of-life among U.S. states. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(5), 619–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world: The paradox of happy peasants and miserable Millionaires. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., Eggers, A., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Happiness Ranking in Japan” on Youtube (in Japanese): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqRRiA05Xt8 Accessed May 16, 2012.

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being and social capital: Does suicide pose a puzzle? Social Indicator Research, 81(3), 455–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroki, M. (2011). Does social trust increase individual happiness in Japan? The Japanese Economic Review, 62(4), 444–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2011). Area-level income inequality and individual happiness: evidence from Japan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(4), 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327(5965), 576–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, K. (2011). The Happiness Ranking in Japan. (In Japanese). www.hosei.ac.jp/documents/koho/photo/2011/11/20111110.pdf Accessed May 16, 2012.

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. www.mofa.go.jp/announce/ps/pdfs/Happiness_1204_1.pdf Accessed May 16, 2012.

  • Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica, 65(257), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Todd Sorensen and two anonymous referees for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masanori Kuroki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuroki, M. The Paradoxical Negative Association between Subjective Well-Being and the Objective “Happiness Ranking” in Japan. Applied Research Quality Life 8, 251–259 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9187-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9187-5

Keywords

Navigation