Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering
  3. Article

Modeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing

  • Review Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 February 2018
  • Volume 13, pages 482–492, (2018)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Modeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing
Download PDF
  • Wentao Yan1,
  • Stephen Lin1,
  • Orion L. Kafka1,
  • Cheng Yu1,
  • Zeliang Liu1,
  • Yanping Lian1,
  • Sarah Wolff1,
  • Jian Cao1,
  • Gregory J. Wagner1 &
  • …
  • Wing Kam Liu1 
  • 5579 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

This paper presents our latest work on comprehensive modeling of process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing (AM) materials, including using data-mining techniques to close the cycle of design-predict-optimize. To illustrate the process-structure relationship, the multi-scale multi-physics process modeling starts from the micro-scale to establish a mechanistic heat source model, to the meso-scale models of individual powder particle evolution, and finally to the macro-scale model to simulate the fabrication process of a complex product. To link structure and properties, a high-efficiency mechanistic model, self-consistent clustering analyses, is developed to capture a variety of material response. The model incorporates factors such as voids, phase composition, inclusions, and grain structures, which are the differentiating features of AM metals. Furthermore, we propose data-mining as an effective solution for novel rapid design and optimization, which is motivated by the numerous influencing factors in the AM process. We believe this paper will provide a roadmap to advance AM fundamental understanding and guide the monitoring and advanced diagnostics of AM processing.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Data-driven multi-scale multi-physics models to derive process–structure–property relationships for additive manufacturing

Article 12 January 2018

Uncertainty Quantification in Metallic Additive Manufacturing Through Physics-Informed Data-Driven Modeling

Article 07 June 2019

Review on Computational Modeling of Process–Microstructure–Property Relationships in Metal Additive Manufacturing

Article 12 November 2019

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Mechanical Process Engineering
  • Process Chemistry
  • Process Engineering
  • Materials Mechanics
  • Materials Engineering
  • Building Information Modeling
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. ASTM International, 2014

  2. Smith J, Xiong W, Yan W, et al. Linking process, structure, property, and performance for metal-based additive manufacturing: Computational approaches with experimental support. Computational Mechanics, 2016, 57(4): 583–610

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Yan W, Ge W, Smith J, et al. Multi-scale modeling of electron beam melting of functionally graded materials. Acta Materialia, 2016, 115: 403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heinl P, Müller L, Körner C, et al. Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomaterialia, 2008, 4(5): 1536–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang R, Riddle M, Graziano D, et al. Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: The case of lightweight aircraft components. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135: 1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yadroitsau I. tSelective laser melting: Direct manufacturing of 3Dobjects by selective laser melting of metal powders. Lambert Academic Publishing, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schoinochoritis B, Chantzis D, Salonitis K. Simulation of metallic powder bed additive manufacturing processes with the finite element method: A critical review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2015, 231(1): 96–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Körner C, Bauereiβ A, Attar E. Fundamental consolidation mechanisms during selective beam melting of powders. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 21(8): 085011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khairallah S A, Anderson A T, Rubenchik A, et al. Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Materialia, 2016, 108: 36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiu C, Panwisawas C, Ward M, et al. On the role of melt flow into the surface structure and porosity development during selective laser melting. Acta Materialia, 2015, 96: 72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirt C W, Nichols B D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 39(1): 201–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rai A, Markl M, Körner C. A coupled cellular automaton-lattice Boltzmann model for grain structure simulation during additive manufacturing. Computational Materials Science, 2016, 124: 37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Panwisawas C, Qiu C, Anderson M J, et al. Mesoscale modelling of selective laser melting: Thermal fluid dynamics and microstructural evolution. Computational Materials Science, 2017, 126: 479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leuders S, Vollmer M, Brenne F, et al. Fatigue strength prediction for titanium alloy TiAl6V4 manufactured by selective laser melting. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 2015, 46(9): 3816–3823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedayati R, Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Sadighi M, et al. Computational prediction of the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 84: 67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan W, Smith J, Ge W, et al. Multiscale modeling of electron beam and substrate interaction: A new heat source model. Computational Mechanics, 2015, 56(2): 265–276

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yan W, Ge W, Qian Y, et al. Multi-physics modeling of single/ multiple track defect mechanisms in electron beam selective melting. Acta Materialia, 2017, 134: 324–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan W, Qian Y, Lin S, et al. Meso-scale modeling of multiple-layer fabrication process in selective electron beam melting: Inter-layer/ track voids formation. Materials & Design, 2018, 141: 210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan W, Ge W, Smith J, et al. Towards high-quality selective beam melting technologies: Modeling and experiments of single track formations. In: Proceedings of 26th Annual International Symposium on Solid Freeform Fabrication. Austin, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yan W, Liu W K, Lin F. An effective finite element heat transfer model for electron beam melting process. In: Proceedings of Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies Conference. Madrid, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wolff S J, Lin S, Faierson E J, et al. A framework to link localized cooling and properties of directed energy deposition (DED)-processed Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Materialia, 2017, 132: 106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith J, Xiong W, Cao J, et al. Thermodynamically consistent microstructure prediction of additively manufactured materials. Computational Mechanics, 2016, 57(3): 359–370

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Z, Moore J A, Aldousari SM, et al. A statistical descriptor based volume-integral micromechanics model of heterogeneous material with arbitrary inclusion shape. Computational Mechanics, 2015, 55 (5): 963–981

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Z, Bessa M, Liu W K. Self-consistent clustering analysis: An efficient multi-scale scheme for inelastic heterogeneous materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 306: 319–341

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Z, Moore J A, Liu W K. An extended micromechanics method for probing interphase properties in polymer nanocomposites. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2016, 95: 663–680

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Groeber M A, Jackson M A. DREAM. 3d: A digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 2014, 3(1): 5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moore J A, Frankel D, Prasannavenkatesan R, et al. A crystal plasticity-based study of the relationship between microstructure and ultra-high-cycle fatigue life in nickel titanium alloys. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 91(Part 1): 183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bessa M, Bostanabad R, Liu Z, et al. A framework for data-driven analysis of materials under un-certainty: Countering the curse of dimensionality. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 320: 633–667

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Witten I H, Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. New York: ACM, 2005

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

W. Liu and W. Yan acknowledge the support by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Center for Hierarchical Materials Design (CHiMaD) (Grant Nos. 70NANB13Hl94 and 70NANB14H012). S. Lin and O. L. Kafka acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (Grant No. DGE-1324585).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA

    Wentao Yan, Stephen Lin, Orion L. Kafka, Cheng Yu, Zeliang Liu, Yanping Lian, Sarah Wolff, Jian Cao, Gregory J. Wagner & Wing Kam Liu

Authors
  1. Wentao Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Orion L. Kafka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cheng Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zeliang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yanping Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sarah Wolff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jian Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gregory J. Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wing Kam Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wing Kam Liu.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, and a link is provided to the Creative Commons license, indicating if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, W., Lin, S., Kafka, O.L. et al. Modeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing. Front. Mech. Eng. 13, 482–492 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0505-y

Download citation

  • Received: 23 October 2017

  • Accepted: 17 November 2017

  • Published: 12 February 2018

  • Issue Date: December 2018

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0505-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • additive manufacturing
  • thermal fluid flow
  • data mining
  • material modeling

Profiles

  1. Sarah Wolff View author profile
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Associated Content

Part of a collection:

Additive Manufacturing

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature