Skip to main content
Log in

Intensified risk to ecosystem productivity under climate change in the arid/humid transition zone in northern China

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing the climate change risk faced by the ecosystems in the arid/humid transition zone (AHTZ) in northern China holds scientific significance to climate change adaptation. We simulated the net primary productivity (NPP) for four representative concentration pathways (RCPs) using an improved Lund-Potsdam-Jena model. Then a method was established based on the NPP to identify the climate change risk level. From the midterm period (2041–2070) to the long-term period (2071–2099), the risks indicated by the negative anomaly and the downward trend of the NPP gradually extended and increased. The higher the scenario emissions, the more serious the risk. In particular, under the RCP8.5 scenario, during 2071–2099, the total risk area would be 81.85%, that of the high-risk area would reach 54.71%. In this high-risk area, the NPP anomaly would reach −96.00±46.95 gC·m−2·a−1, and the rate of change of the NPP would reach −3.56±3.40 gC·m−2·a−1. The eastern plain of the AHTZ and the eastern grasslands of Inner Mongolia are expected to become the main risk concentration areas. Our results indicated that the management of future climate change risks requires the consideration of the synergistic effects of warming and intensified drying on the ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen C D, Macalady A K, Chenchouni H et al., 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology & Management, 259(4): 660–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D et al., 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreu-Hayles L, D’Arrigo R, Anchukaitis K J et al., 2011. Varying boreal forest response to Arctic environmental change at the Firth River, Alaska. Environmental Research Letters, 6(4): 045503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora V K, Boer G J, 2005. Fire as an interactive component of dynamic vegetation models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(G2): 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmus M L, Nicolodi J O, Anello L S et al., 2019. The risk to lose ecosystem services due to climate change: A South American case. Ecological Engineering, 130: 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che M L, Chen B Z, Wang Y et al., 2013. Review of dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25(1): 263–271. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y N, Zhang X Q, Fang G H et al., 2020. Potential risks and challenges of climate change in the arid region of northwestern China. Regional Sustainability, 1(1): 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collatz G J, Ball J T, Grivet C et al., 1991. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: A model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Elsevier, 54(2–4): 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collatz G J, Ribas-Carbo M, Berry J, 1992. Coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model for leaves of C4 plants. Functional Plant Biology, 19(5): 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessai S, Adger W N, Hulme M et al., 2004. Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change. Climatic Change, 64(1/2): 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffenbaugh N S, Field C B, 2013. Changes in ecologically critical terrestrial climate conditions. Science, 341(6145): 486–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y H, 2018. Sustainable management and action in China under the increasing risks of global climate change. Engineering, 4(3): 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, 1992. Transitional Climate Zones and Biome Boundaries: A Case Study from China. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung I Y, Doney S C, Lindsay K et al., 2005. Evolution of carbon sinks in a changing climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(32): 11201–11206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gang C C, Zhang Y Z, Wang Z Q et al., 2017. Modeling the dynamics of distribution, extent, and NPP of global terrestrial ecosystems in response to future climate change. Global and Planetary Change, 148: 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimann M, Reichstein M, 2008. Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks. Nature, 451(7176): 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyder U, Schaphoff S, Gerten D et al., 2011. Risk of severe climate change impact on the terrestrial biosphere. Environmental Research Letters, 6(3): 034036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, He B, Chen A F et al., 2016. Drought dominates the interannual variability in global terrestrial net primary production by controlling semi-arid ecosystems. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 24639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R N, Preston B L, 2011. Adaptation and risk management. Wiley Interdiplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(2): 296–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin X, Qian W H, 2012. Review of the global monsoon and monsoon marginal zones. Advances in Earth Science, 27(1): 26–34. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell J S, Oneil E E, Mckenzie D et al., 2010. Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington State, USA. Climatic Change, 102(1): 129–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y H, Wang W T, 2019. The new situation of global climate governance and China’s green development strategy. China Sustainability Tribune, 18(Suppl.1): 16–21. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, De Mazancourt C, Duffy E, 2013. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: A synthesis of underlying mechanisms. Ecology Letters, 16(Suppl.1): 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon N F, O’Connor R E, 2005. Dangerous climate change: The role for risk research. Risk Analysis, 25(6): 1387–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao J F, Dan L, Wang B et al., 2010. Simulation and evaluation of terrestrial ecosystem NPP with M-SDGVM over continental China. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 27(2): 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao J F, Fu W T, Shi X Y et al., 2015. Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends. Environmental Research Letters, 10(9): 094008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnen J G V, Onigkeit J, Alcamo J, 2002. Critical climate change as an approach to assess climate change impacts in Europe: Development and application. Environmental Science & Policy, 5(4): 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss R H, Edmonds J A, Hibbard K A et al., 2010. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463(7282): 747–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu S J, Li J L, Zhou W et al., 2013. Spatial-temporal distribution of net primary productivity and its relationship with climate factors in Inner Mongolia from 2001 to 2010. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(12): 3752–3764. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen U N, Ball B A, 2015. Impacts of altered precipitation regimes on soil communities and biogeochemistry in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 21(4): 1407–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson R J, Scurlock J M O, Prince S D et al., 2013. NPP Multi-Biome: Global Primary Production Data Initiative Products, R2. ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan S F, Tian H Q, Dangal S R S et al., 2014. Complex spatiotemporal responses of global terrestrial primary production to climate change and increasing atmospheric CO2 in the 21st century. Plos One, 9(11): e112810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan S F, Tian H Q, Lu C Q et al., 2015. Net primary production of major plant functional types in China: Vegetation classification and ecosystem simulation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(2): 28–36. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piao S, Liu Z, Wang T et al., 2017. Weakening temperature control on the interannual variations of spring carbon uptake across northern lands. Nature Climate Change, 7(5): 359–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce D W, Barnett T P, Santer B D et al., 2009. Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(21): 8441–8446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piontek F, Müller C, Pugh T A et al., 2014. Multisectoral climate impact hotspots in a warming world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(9): 3233–3238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin D H, 2015. China’s National Assessment Report on Extreme Climate Events and Disaster Risk Management and Adaptation. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna R N, Charles D K, Hirofumi H et al., 2003. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science, 300(5625): 1560–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds J F, Smith D M S, Lambin E F et al., 2007. Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development. Science, 316(5826): 847–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson A D, Hufkens K, Milliman T et al., 2018. Ecosystem warming extends vegetation activity but heightens vulnerability to cold temperatures. Nature, 560(7718): 368–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholze M, Knorr W, Arnell N W et al., 2006. A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(35): 13116–13120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon A W, Macias-Fauria M, Long P R et al., 2016. Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature, 531(7593): 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitch S S B, Ic. P, Arneth A et al., 2003. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 9(2): 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneyers R, 1990. On the statistical analysis of series of observations. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 258(22): 13680–13684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Noble I, Canadell J et al., 1998. The terrestrial carbon cycle: Implications for the Kyoto Protocol. Science, 280(5368): 1393–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor K E, Stouffer R J, Meehl G A, 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(4): 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibeault J M, Seth A, 2014. Changing climate extremes in the Northeast United States: Observations and projections from CMIP5. Climatic Change, 127(2): 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban M C, 2015. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science, 348(6234): 571–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wang X B, Liu D W et al., 2014. Aridity threshold in controlling ecosystem nitrogen cycling in arid and semi-arid grasslands. Nature Communications, 5(1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu G H, Li Z et al., 2016. Impacts of climate change on net primary productivity in arid and semiarid regions of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 26(1): 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Chen W, Huang G et al., 2017. Changes of the transitional climate zone in East Asia: Past and future. Climate Dynamics, 49(4): 1463–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warszawski L, Frieler K, Huber V et al., 2014. The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP): Project framework. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(9): 3228–3232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warszawski L, Friend A, Ostberg S et al., 2013. A multi-model analysis of risk of ecosystem shifts under climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4): 044018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y M, Yuan X C, Wu G et al., 2014. Climate change risk management: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 28(5): 347–356. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S H, 2011. Integrated Risk Governance. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S H, Yin Y H, Zheng D et al., 2005. Aridity/humidity status of land surface in China during the last three decades. Science in China, 48(9): 1510–1518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z T, Dijkstra P, Koch G W et al., 2011. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: A meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Global Change Biology, 17(2): 927–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C G, McDowell N G, Fisher R A et al., 2019. Increasing impacts of extreme droughts on vegetation productivity under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 9(12): 948–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu M J, Wen X F, Wang H M et al., 2014. Effects of climatic factors and ecosystem responses on the inter-annual variability of evapotranspiration in a coniferous plantation in subtropical China. Plos One, 9(1): e85593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Zhang X, Luo Z et al., 2017. Nonlinear variations of net primary productivity and its relationship with climate and vegetation phenology, China. Forest, 8(10): 361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y H, Ma D Y, Wu S H, 2018a. Climate change risk to forests in China associated with warming. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y H, Ma D Y, Wu S H, 2018b. Nonlinear changes in aridity due to precipitation and evapotranspiration in China from 1961 to 2015. Climate Research, 74(3): 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y H, Ma D Y, Wu S H et al., 2015. Projections of aridity and its regional variability over China in the mid-21st century. International Journal of Climatology, 35(14): 4387–4398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y H, Wu S H, Zheng D et al., 2008. Radiation calibration of FAO56 Penman-Monteith model to estimate reference crop evapotranspiration in China. Agricultural Water Management, 95(1): 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y Y, Tang Q H, Wang L X et al., 2016. Risk and contributing factors of ecosystem shifts over naturally vegetated land under climate change in China. Scientific Reports, 20905.

  • Yu G R, He N P, Wang Q F, 2013. Carbon Budget and Carbon Sink of Ecosystems in China: Theoretical Basic and Comprehensive Assessment. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Gu F, Huang M et al., 2020. Impacts of 1.5°C and 2°C global warming on net primary productivity and carbon balance in China’s terrestrial ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(7): 2849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Q Z, Wu S H, Zhao D S et al., 2014. Modeling net primary productivity of the terrestrial ecosystem in China from 1961 to 2005. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G L, Xu X L, Zhou C P et al., 2011. Responses of vegetation changes to climatic variations in Hulun Buir grassland in past 30 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(1): 47–58. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L S, Fang X Q, Ren G Y et al., 1997. Environmental changes in the north China farming-grazing transitional zone. Earth Science Frontiers (China University of Geosciences, Beijing), 4(1/2): 131–140. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T B, Chen L, Ma Z G, 2014. Simulation of historical and projected climate change in arid and semiarid areas by CMIP5 models. Science Bulletin, 59(4): 412–429. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng D, 2008. Ecogeographical Regionalization Research of China. Beijing: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaohong Wu.

Additional information

Foundation: National Key R&D Program of China, No.2018YFC1508805; The Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDA20020202, No.XDA19040304

Author: Yin Yunhe (1979-), Professor, specialized in climate change impact and risk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, Y., Deng, H., Ma, D. et al. Intensified risk to ecosystem productivity under climate change in the arid/humid transition zone in northern China. J. Geogr. Sci. 31, 1261–1282 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1897-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1897-x

Keywords

Navigation