Abstract
In order to explore the flame structure and propagation behavior of premixed propane/air in the transition from laminar to turbulent combustion, the high speed camera and Schlieren images methods were used to record the photograph of flame propagation process in a semi-vented pipe. Meanwhile, the super-thin thermocouple and ionization current probe methods were applied to detect the temperature distribution and reaction intensity of combustion reaction. The characteristics of propane/air flame propagation and microstructure were analyzed in detail by the experimental results coupled with chemical reaction thermodynamics. In the test, the particular tulip flame behavior and the formation process in the laminar-turbulent transition were disclosed clearly. From the Schlieren images and iron current results, one conclusion can be drawn that the small-scale turbulent combustion also appeared in laminar flame, which made little influence on the flame shape, but increased the flame thickness obviously.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gulder O L, Smallwood G J, Wong R, et al. Flame front surface characteristics in turbulent premixed propane/air combustion. Combust Flame, 2000, 120: 407–416
Prugh R W. Quantitative evaluation of fireball hazards. Process Saf Prog, 1994, 13(2): 83–91
Yang Y, Liu J Z, Zhou T L, et al. Optically experimental study on flame microstructure and propagation of gas and dust explosion. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology. Beijing: Science Press, 2004. 2432–2436
Dorofeev S B, Sidorov V P, Dvoinishnikov A E. Deflagration to detonation transition in large confined volume of lean hydrogen-air mixtures. Combust Flame, 1996, 104(1): 95–110
Ratzed T K, Pantow E, Eichert H. Modeling of hydrogen combustion: Turbulent flame acceleration and detonation. Intern Assoc Hydr Energy, 1995, 21(5): 407–414
Dobashi R. Experimental study on gas explosion behavior in enclosure. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 1997, 10(2): 83–89
Prithard D K, Freeman D J, Guilbert P W. Prediction of explosion pressure in confined spaces. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 1996, 9(3): 205–215
Lin J C, Lin T H. Structure and temperature distribution of a stagnation-point diesel spray premixed flame. Energ Convers Manage, 2005, 46(18–19): 2892–2906
Bradley D, Sheppard C G W, Woolley R, et al. The development and structure of flame instabilities and cellularity at low Markstein numbers in explosions. Combust Flame, 2000, 122: 195–209
Kersten C, Forster H. Investigation of deflagrations and detonations in pipes and flame arresters by high-speed framing. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 2004, 17: 43–50
Simon L, Wlodzimierz B, Marcin J. Experimental study of the fuel jet combustion in high temperature and low oxygen content exhaust gases. Energy, 2000, 530: 373–384
Eschenroeder A Q. Intensification of turbulence by chemical heat release. Phys Fluids, 1964, 7: 1735–1743
Markstain G H. Experimental and theoretical studies flame front stability. J Aeronaut Sci, 1981, 3: 18–26
Fairweather M, Hargrave G K, Ibrahim S S, et al. Studies of premixed flame propagation in explosion tubes. Combust Flame, 1999, 116: 504–518
Furukawa J, Maruta K, Hirano T, et al. Flame front configuration of turbulent premixed flames. Combust Flame, 1998, 112: 293–301
Parsinejad F, Arcari C, Metghalchi H. Flame structure and burning speed of JP-10 air mixtures. Combust Sci Techn, 2006, 178: 975–1000
Elicer-Cortes J C, Ruz C, Hernandez R H, et al. Observation of preferred instability modes in a mechanically excited thermal plume using Schlieren visualizations. Intern Commun Heat Mass Transfer, 2005, 32: 360–370
Carlin V, Makhviladze G, Roberts J, et al. Effect of Lewis number on flame front fragmentation in narrow closed channels. Combust Flame, 2000, 120: 173–187
Huang Y, Yang V. Bifurcation of flame structure in a lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor: Transition from stable to unstable flame. Combust Flame. 2004, 136: 383–389
Zhang X Q, Lei Y, Wang B R, et al. Turbulence in laminar premixed V-flames. Sci China Ser E: Tech Sci, 2003, 46(6): 574–580
Kuzuu K, Ishii K, Kuwahara K. Numerical simulation of premixed flame propagation in a closed tube. Fluid Dynam Res, 1996, 18(3): 165–182
Clanet C, Searby G. On the “Tulip Flame” phenomenon. Combust Flame, 1996, 105: 225–238
Guenoche H. Nonsteady Flame Propagation. New York: Pergamon, 1964
Starke R, Roth P. An experimental investigation of flame behavior during cylindrical vessel explosions. Combust Flame, 1986, 66(3): 249–259
Gonzalez M, Borghi R, Saouab A. Interaction of a flame front with its self-generated flow in an enclosure: The “tulip flame” phenomenon. Combust Flame, 1992, 88(2): 201–220
Strehlow R A. Combustion Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984
Liu Y. Experimental study on methane-coal compound flame structure and propagation characteristics (in Chinese). Ph. D Thesis. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2006
Ju W J, Dobashi R, Hirano T. Reaction zone structure and propagation mechanisms of flames in static acid particle clouds. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 1998, 11(6): 423–430
Sun J H, Dobashi R, Hirano T. Concentration profile of particles across a flame propagating through an iron particle cloud. Combust Flame, 2003, 134(4): 381–387
Sun J H, Dobashi R, Hirano T. Temperature profile across the combustion zone propagating through an iron particle cloud. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 2001, 14: 463–467
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50576093) and the Key Project of NSFC (Grant No. 50536030)
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Sun, J., Liu, Y. et al. Microstructure of premixed propane/air flame in the transition from laminar to turbulent combustion. CHINESE SCI BULL 52, 685–691 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0061-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0061-z