Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructure of premixed propane/air flame in the transition from laminar to turbulent combustion

  • Articles
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

In order to explore the flame structure and propagation behavior of premixed propane/air in the transition from laminar to turbulent combustion, the high speed camera and Schlieren images methods were used to record the photograph of flame propagation process in a semi-vented pipe. Meanwhile, the super-thin thermocouple and ionization current probe methods were applied to detect the temperature distribution and reaction intensity of combustion reaction. The characteristics of propane/air flame propagation and microstructure were analyzed in detail by the experimental results coupled with chemical reaction thermodynamics. In the test, the particular tulip flame behavior and the formation process in the laminar-turbulent transition were disclosed clearly. From the Schlieren images and iron current results, one conclusion can be drawn that the small-scale turbulent combustion also appeared in laminar flame, which made little influence on the flame shape, but increased the flame thickness obviously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gulder O L, Smallwood G J, Wong R, et al. Flame front surface characteristics in turbulent premixed propane/air combustion. Combust Flame, 2000, 120: 407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prugh R W. Quantitative evaluation of fireball hazards. Process Saf Prog, 1994, 13(2): 83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Y, Liu J Z, Zhou T L, et al. Optically experimental study on flame microstructure and propagation of gas and dust explosion. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology. Beijing: Science Press, 2004. 2432–2436

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorofeev S B, Sidorov V P, Dvoinishnikov A E. Deflagration to detonation transition in large confined volume of lean hydrogen-air mixtures. Combust Flame, 1996, 104(1): 95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratzed T K, Pantow E, Eichert H. Modeling of hydrogen combustion: Turbulent flame acceleration and detonation. Intern Assoc Hydr Energy, 1995, 21(5): 407–414

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dobashi R. Experimental study on gas explosion behavior in enclosure. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 1997, 10(2): 83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prithard D K, Freeman D J, Guilbert P W. Prediction of explosion pressure in confined spaces. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 1996, 9(3): 205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin J C, Lin T H. Structure and temperature distribution of a stagnation-point diesel spray premixed flame. Energ Convers Manage, 2005, 46(18–19): 2892–2906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley D, Sheppard C G W, Woolley R, et al. The development and structure of flame instabilities and cellularity at low Markstein numbers in explosions. Combust Flame, 2000, 122: 195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kersten C, Forster H. Investigation of deflagrations and detonations in pipes and flame arresters by high-speed framing. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 2004, 17: 43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon L, Wlodzimierz B, Marcin J. Experimental study of the fuel jet combustion in high temperature and low oxygen content exhaust gases. Energy, 2000, 530: 373–384

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eschenroeder A Q. Intensification of turbulence by chemical heat release. Phys Fluids, 1964, 7: 1735–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Markstain G H. Experimental and theoretical studies flame front stability. J Aeronaut Sci, 1981, 3: 18–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fairweather M, Hargrave G K, Ibrahim S S, et al. Studies of premixed flame propagation in explosion tubes. Combust Flame, 1999, 116: 504–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Furukawa J, Maruta K, Hirano T, et al. Flame front configuration of turbulent premixed flames. Combust Flame, 1998, 112: 293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsinejad F, Arcari C, Metghalchi H. Flame structure and burning speed of JP-10 air mixtures. Combust Sci Techn, 2006, 178: 975–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elicer-Cortes J C, Ruz C, Hernandez R H, et al. Observation of preferred instability modes in a mechanically excited thermal plume using Schlieren visualizations. Intern Commun Heat Mass Transfer, 2005, 32: 360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carlin V, Makhviladze G, Roberts J, et al. Effect of Lewis number on flame front fragmentation in narrow closed channels. Combust Flame, 2000, 120: 173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang Y, Yang V. Bifurcation of flame structure in a lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor: Transition from stable to unstable flame. Combust Flame. 2004, 136: 383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X Q, Lei Y, Wang B R, et al. Turbulence in laminar premixed V-flames. Sci China Ser E: Tech Sci, 2003, 46(6): 574–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuzuu K, Ishii K, Kuwahara K. Numerical simulation of premixed flame propagation in a closed tube. Fluid Dynam Res, 1996, 18(3): 165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clanet C, Searby G. On the “Tulip Flame” phenomenon. Combust Flame, 1996, 105: 225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guenoche H. Nonsteady Flame Propagation. New York: Pergamon, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  24. Starke R, Roth P. An experimental investigation of flame behavior during cylindrical vessel explosions. Combust Flame, 1986, 66(3): 249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzalez M, Borghi R, Saouab A. Interaction of a flame front with its self-generated flow in an enclosure: The “tulip flame” phenomenon. Combust Flame, 1992, 88(2): 201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Strehlow R A. Combustion Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Y. Experimental study on methane-coal compound flame structure and propagation characteristics (in Chinese). Ph. D Thesis. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ju W J, Dobashi R, Hirano T. Reaction zone structure and propagation mechanisms of flames in static acid particle clouds. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 1998, 11(6): 423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun J H, Dobashi R, Hirano T. Concentration profile of particles across a flame propagating through an iron particle cloud. Combust Flame, 2003, 134(4): 381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun J H, Dobashi R, Hirano T. Temperature profile across the combustion zone propagating through an iron particle cloud. J Loss Prevent Process Industries, 2001, 14: 463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun JinHua.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50576093) and the Key Project of NSFC (Grant No. 50536030)

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Sun, J., Liu, Y. et al. Microstructure of premixed propane/air flame in the transition from laminar to turbulent combustion. CHINESE SCI BULL 52, 685–691 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0061-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0061-z

Keywords

Navigation