Skip to main content
Log in

Attribute reduction theory of concept lattice based on decision formal contexts

  • Published:
Science in China Series F: Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theory of concept lattices is an efficient tool for knowledge representation and knowledge discovery, and is applied to many fields successfully. One focus of knowledge discovery is knowledge reduction. Based on the reduction theory of classical formal context, this paper proposes the definition of decision formal context and its reduction theory, which extends the reduction theory of concept lattices. In this paper, strong consistence and weak consistence of decision formal context are defined respectively. For strongly consistent decision formal context, the judgment theorems of consistent sets are examined, and approaches to reduction are given. For weakly consistent decision formal context, implication mapping is defined, and its reduction is studied. Finally, the relation between reducts of weakly consistent decision formal context and reducts of implication mapping is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wille R. Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Rival I, ed. Ordered Sets. Reidel: Dordrecht-Boston, 1982. 445–470

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oosthuizen G D. The application of concept lattice to machine learning. Technical Report. University of Pretoria, South Africa, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ho T B. Incremental conceptual clustering in the framework of Galois lattice. In: Lu H, Motoda H, Liu H, eds. KDD: Techniques and Applications. Singapore: World Scientific, 1997. 49–64

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kent R E, Bowman C M. Digital libraries, conceptual knowledge systems and the nebula interface. Technical Report. University of Arkansas, 1995

  5. Corbett D, Burrow A L. Knowledge reuse in SEED exploiting conceptual graphs. In: Eklund P W, Ellis G, Mann G, eds. Proceeding of 4th International Conference on Conceptual Graphs (ICCS’96). Heidelberg: Springer, 1996. 56–60

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sutton A, Maletic J I. Recovering UML class models from C++: a detailed explanation. Inf Software Tech, 2007, 49(3): 212–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siff M, Reps T. Identifying modules via concept analysis. In: Harrold M J, Visaggio G, eds. Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 1997. 170–179

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho T B. An approach to concept formation based on formal concept analysis. IEICE Trans Inf Syst, 1995, E782D(5): 553–559

    Google Scholar 

  9. Godin R. Incremental concept formation algorithm based on Galois (concept) lattices. Comp Intell, 1995, 11(2): 246–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yao Y Y. Concept lattices in rough set theory. In: Dick S, Kurgan L, Pedrycz W, et al. eds. Proceedings of 2004 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS 2004). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2004. 796–801

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saquer J, Deogun J S. Concept approximations based on rough sets and similarity measures. Appl Math Comp Sci, 2001, 11(3): 655–674

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Tonella P. Using a concept lattice of decomposition slices for program understanding and impact analysis. IEEE Trans Software Eng, 2003, 29(6): 495–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grigoriev P A, Yevtushenko S A. Elements of an agile discovery environment. In: Grieser G, Tanaka Y, Yamamoto A, eds. Proceeding of 6th International Conference on Discovery Science (DS 2003). Berlin: Springer, 2003. 309–316

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gatzemeier F H, Meyer O. Text schema mining using graphs and formal concept analysis. In: Priss U, Corbett D, Angelova G, eds. Conceptual Structures — Integration and Interfaces (ICCS 2002). Berlin: Springer, 2002. 107–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang W X, Wei L, Qi J J. Attribute reduction theory and approach to concept lattice. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2005, 48(6): 713–726

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang W X, Qiu G F. Uncertain Decision Making Based on Rough Sets (in Chinese). Peking: Tsinghua University Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ganter B, Wille R. Formal Concept Analysis, Mathematical Foundations. Berlin: Springer, 1999

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei L. Reduction theory and approach to rough set and concept lattice. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree (in Chinese). Xi’an: Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Wei.

Additional information

Supported by the National 973 Program of China (Grant No. 2002CB312200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60703117, 60433010 and 60673096), and the Doctor Research Fund of Northwest University in China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wei, L., Qi, J. & Zhang, W. Attribute reduction theory of concept lattice based on decision formal contexts. Sci. China Ser. F-Inf. Sci. 51, 910–923 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-008-0067-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-008-0067-4

Keywords

Navigation