Abstract
Some of China’s major cities have entered the middle and late stages of urbanization, and the development focus of these cities has gradually shifted from outward expansion to inward renewal. The community, as the basic unit of a city, is undoubtedly the main object of urban renewal. In order to efficiently and effectively address the problems in current community construction, it is necessary to conduct a large-scale in-depth assessment of the community livability, which can directly imply the satisfaction of residents with their quality of life. This study achieved the first comprehensive livability assessment at the individual community scale for 42 major cities of China from the perspective of remotely sensed and crowd-sourced geographic information. Specifically, we produced abundant fine-grained datasets for 42 cities, including high-resolution land cover maps interpreted from Ziyuan-3 satellites (ZY-3, 2.1 m), building height, point-of-interest, and boundaries of 101,630 communities. As designed in our proposed framework, the community livability was evaluated by 5 level-1 indicators, 27 level-2 indicators and an integrated community livability index (CLI). A number of interesting findings were obtained from this assessment: (1) According to the expert questionnaires, living comfort was considered as the most important livability factor for residents with the highest weight, while the building environment was rated the least. The negative factors (e.g., the factories around the community) impacted more on livability than the positive ones. (2) Most communities in major Chinese cities were characterized by dense buildings and sparse green spaces. (3) In these cities, community security construction was severely insufficient, particularly in less developed regions. (4) Imbalanced community livability development was prevalent across cities, and simultaneously, the CLI distribution within cities also exhibited significant spatial aggregation and heterogeneity. This research is expected to reveal the status quo of community livability in China, and thus allow for targeted policy formulation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borkowski A S D. 2019. Lima: A livable city. In: Wagner F, Caves R W, eds. Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-Being of People and Communities. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. 149–164
Clark J. 2018. Urban Renewal, Community and Participation Theory. Policy and Practice. Springer
del Martínez-Bravo M M, Martínez-del-Río J, Antolín-López R. 2019. Trade-offs among urban sustainability, pollution and livability in European cities. J Cleaner Production, 224: 651–660
Godschalk D R. 2004. Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. J Am Plann Assoc, 70: 5–13
Guan X, Wei H, Lu S, Dai Q, Su H. 2018. Assessment on the urbanization strategy in China: Achievements, challenges and reflections. Habitat Int, 71: 97–109
Huang X, Wen D, Li J, Qin R. 2017. Multi-level monitoring of subtle urban changes for the megacities of China using high-resolution multi-view satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 196: 56–75
Huang X, Chen H, Gong J. 2018. Angular difference feature extraction for urban scene classification using ZY-3 multi-angle high-resolution satellite imagery. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens, 135: 127–141
Huang X, Cao Y, Li J. 2020a. An automatic change detection method for monitoring newly constructed building areas using time-series multiview high-resolution optical satellite images. Remote Sens Environ, 244: 111802
Huang X, Wang Y, Li J, Chang X, Cao Y, Xie J, Gong J. 2020b. High-resolution urban land-cover mapping and landscape analysis of the 42 major cities in China using ZY-3 satellite images. Sci Bull, 65: 1039–1048
Jing C, Zhou W, Qian Y, Yu W, Zheng Z. 2021. A novel approach for quantifying high-frequency urban land cover changes at the block level with scarce clear-sky Landsat observations. Remote Sens Environ, 255: 112293
Kaal H. 2011. A conceptual history of livability. City, 15: 532–547
Li X, Zhou W, Ouyang Z. 2013. Relationship between land surface temperature and spatial pattern of greenspace: What are the effects of spatial resolution? Landscape Urban Planning, 114: 1–8
Li W, Niu Z, Chen H, Li D, Wu M, Zhao W. 2016. Remote estimation of canopy height and aboveground biomass of maize using high-resolution stereo images from a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle system. Ecol Indicat, 67: 637–648
Litman T. 2010. Sustainability and Livability: Summary of Definitions, Goals, Objectives and Performance Indicators. New York: Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 1–4
Liu C, Huang X, Wen D, Chen H, Gong J. 2017. Assessing the quality of building height extraction from ZiYuan-3 multi-view imagery. Remote Sens Lett, 8: 907–916
Oteman M, Wiering M, Helderman J K. 2014. The institutional space of community initiatives for renewable energy: A comparative case study of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Energ Sustain Soc, 4: 11
Pacione M. 2003. Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—A social geographical perspective. Landscape Urban Planning, 65: 19–30
Pan L, Zhang L, Qin S, Yan H, Peng R, Li F. 2021. Study on an artificial society of urban safety livability change. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf, 10: 70
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. 2018. Planning and Design Standards for Urban Residential Areas (GB50180–2018) (in Chinese)
Ruth M, Franklin R S. 2014. Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications. Appl Geogr, 49: 18–23
Stanislav A, Chin J T. 2019. Evaluating livability and perceived values of sustainable neighborhood design: New Urbanism and original urban suburbs. Sustain Cities Soc, 47: 101517
Teo S. 2014. Political tool or quality experience? Urban livability and the Singaporean state’s global city aspirations. Urban Geogr, 35: 916–937
Wagner F, Caves R W. 2012. Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-Being of People and Communities. London: Routledge
Wen D, Huang X, Zhang L, Benediktsson J A. 2015. A novel automatic change detection method for urban high-resolution remotely sensed imagery based on multiindex scene representation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 54: 609–625
Xu M, Cao C, Jia P. 2020. Mapping fine-scale urban spatial population distribution based on high-resolution stereo pair images, points of interest, and land cover data. Remote Sens, 12: 608
Yang J, Huang X, Tang Q. 2020. Satellite-derived river width and its spatiotemporal patterns in China during 1990–2015. Remote Sens Environ, 247: 111918
Yang Q, Huang X, Tang Q. 2020. Irrigation cooling effect on land surface temperature across China based on satellite observations. Sci Total Environ, 705: 135984
Yearbook C S. 2020. China Statistical Yearbook. National Bureau of Statistics of China
Zhan D, Kwan M P, Zhang W, Fan J, Yu J, Dang Y. 2018. Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79: 92–101
Zhang X, Du S, Du S, Liu B. 2020. How do land-use patterns influence residential environment quality? A multiscale geographic survey in Beijing. Remote Sens Environ, 249: 112014
Zhang Y, Li Q, Wang H, Du X, Huang H. 2019. Community scale livability evaluation integrating remote sensing, surface observation and geospatial big data. Int J Appl Earth Observation GeoInf, 80: 173–186
Zhao Y, An N, Chen H, Tao W. 2021. Politics of urban renewal: An anatomy of the conflicting discourses on the renovation of China’s urban village. Cities, 111: 103075
Zhu L, Guo Y, Zhang C, Meng J, Ju L, Zhang Y, Tang W. 2020. Assessing community-level livability using combined remote sensing and internet-based big geospatial data. Remote Sens, 12: 4026
Ziblatt D. 2008. Why some cities provide more public goods than others: A subnational comparison of the provision of public goods in German cities in 1912. St Comp Int Dev, 43: 273–289
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41771360 & 41971295)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, X., Liu, Y. Livability assessment of 101,630 communities in China’s major cities: A remote sensing perspective. Sci. China Earth Sci. 65, 1073–1087 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-021-9896-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-021-9896-4