Abstract
Four international standards, Ga1550, MMhb-1, Lp-6, Bem 4M, and one domestic standard BT-1 have been intercalibrated. The repeated measurements on MMhb-1 with different mass demonstrate that MMhb-1 is inhomogeneous in age and its average age is 519.8 Ma. The results of Bern 4M and Lp-6 reflect that they have an invariable value of 40Ar*/39Ark (F) and the ages we obtained are consensus with their K-Ar age: Lp-6=127.7Ma; Bern 4M=18.2 Ma. Analyses of BT-1 age spectra, Ca/K and Cl/K spectra as well as inverse isochrons indicate that the sample is homogeneous and invariable and keeps close chemically, with its trapped argon isotope composition close to the atmosphere. The dating results show that age values are reproducible and steady, total fusion age, step-heating age, plateau age and isochron age are in accord with each other within the error range (2σ). Therefore, we recommend 28.7 Ma as the calibrated age of BT-1.
We also discuss the variation in neutron flux gradients of Beijing 49-2 reactor. It was found that the neutron flux gradient varies considerably, and more monitors (standard samples) are needed to fix the trend of variation. The coefficient of the 49-2 reactor that transfers the ratio of production rate of 37ArCa/39ArK into Ca/K ratio is 1.78. This is different from that reported earlier, 2.0, which may be caused by the reconstruction of the reactor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baksi, A. K., Archibald, D. A., Farrar, E., Intercalibration of 40Ar/39Ar dating standards, Chemical Geology, 1996, 129: 307–324.
Alexander, E. C., Davis, P. K., 40Ar/39Ar ages and trace element contents of Apollo 14 brecciasp; an interlaboratory cross-calibration of 40Ar/39Ar standards, Geochim. Cosmochim Acta, 1974, 38: 911–928.
Roddick, J. C., High precision intercalibration of 40Ar/39Ar standards, Geochim. Cosmochim Acta, 1983, 47: 887–989.
Dazé, A., Lee J, K. W., Villeneuve, M., An intercalibration study of the Fish Canyon sanidine and biotite 40Ar/39Ar standards and some comments in the age of the Fish Canyon tuff, Chemical Geology, 2003, 199: 11–127.
Spell, T. L., McDougall, I., Characterization and calibration of 40Ar/39Ar dating standards, Chemical Geology, 2003, 198: 189–211.
Renne, P. R., Swisher, C. C., Deino, A. L. et al., Intercalibration of standards, absolute ages and uncertainties in 40Ar/39Ar dating, Chemical Geology, 1998, 145: 117–152.
He, H.Y., Wang X.L., Zhou, Z.H. et al., Timing of the Jiufotang formation (Jehol Group) in Liaoning northeastern China, and its implications, Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31: L12605. doi:10.1029/2004GL019790.
Wang, F., Zhu, R. X., Li, Q. et al., A differential uplifting of Qinling orogeny belt evidences from 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology of granites, Earth Science Frontiers (in Chinese), 2004, 11(4): 445–459.
Steiger, R. H., Jäger, E., Subcommision on Geochronology: Convention on the use of decay constants in geo-and cosmochronology, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 1977, 36: 359–362.
McDougall, I., Roksandic, Z., Total fusion 40Ar/39Ar ages using the HIFAR Reactor, J. Geol. Soc. Aust., 1974, 21: 81–89.
Alexander, E. C., Michelson, G. M., Lanphere, M. A., MMhb-1: A new 40Ar/39Ar dating standard. U.S. Geol. Surv., Open File Rep., 1978, 78: 6–8.
Samson, S. D., Alexander, E. C., Calibration of the interlaboratory 40Ar/39Ar dating standard MMhb-1, Chemical Geology, 1987, 66: 27–34.
Lanpher, M. A., Dalrymple, G. B., Fleck, R. J. et al., Intercalibration of mineral standards utilized for K-Ar and 40Ar/39Ar age measurements, Eos, 1990, 71: 1658.
Hall, C. M., Walter, R. C., Westgater, J. A. et al., Geochronology, stratigraphy and geochemistry of Cindery Tuff in Lpiocene hominid-bearing sediments of the Middle Awash, Ethiopia, Nature, 1984, 308: 26–31.
McDougal, I., Harrison, T. M., Geochronology and Thermochronology by the 40Ar/39Ar method, New York, Oxford University Press, 1999, 44–93.
Ingamells, C. O., Engels, J. C., Preparation, analysis and sampling constants for a biotite, U. S. Natl Bur Stand., Spec. Publ., 1976, 422: 403–419.
Odin, G. S. and 35 collaborators, Interlaboratory standards for dating purposes, In: Odin, G. S. eds, Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy, New York: Wiley, 1982, 123–149.
Ingamells, C. O., Control of geochemical error through sampling and subsampling diagrams, Geochim. Cosmochim Acta, 1974, 38: 1225–1238.
Baksi, A. K., Reevaluation of the timing and duration of extrusion of the Imnaha, Picture Gorge and Grande Ronde Basalt, Geol. Soc. Am., Spec. Pap., 1989, 239: 105–111.
Jäger, E., Niggli, E., Baethge, H., Two standard minerals, biotite and muscovite for Rb-Sr and K-Ar age determinations, samples Bern 4B and Bern 4M from a gneiss from Brione, Valle Verzasca (Switzerland), Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt., 1963, 43: 465–470.
Purdy, J. W., Jägerm, E., K-Ar ages on rock-forming minerals from the Central Alps, Mem. Inst. Geol. Mineral., Univ. Padova, 1976, 30: 31–42.
Flisch, M., Potassium-argon analysis, in Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy, ed. Odin, G. S., New York: Wiley, 1982, 151–158.
Sang, H. Q., Ding, L., Dai, T. M., The preliminary results of a standard for Ar/Ar dating on Cenozoic samples, Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and Geochemistry (in Chinese), 2004, 23: 24–27.
Ding, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J. et al., Geologic relationships and geochronology of the Cenozoic and interbedded weathered mantles of Yulinshan in Qiangtang, Northern Tibet, Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45: 2214–2220.
Fu, Y. L., Luo, X. Q., Zhang, S.H. et al., 40Ar/39Ar dating techniques and age determination of some geological samples, Bulletin of the Institute of Geology of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (in Chinese), 1987, 17: 85–107.
Wang, S.S., Constraints of chlorine on 40Ar/39Ar dating and calculation of high precise 40Ar/39Ar ages, Scientia Geologica Sinica (in Chinese), 1992, (4): 369–378.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, F., He, H., Zhu, R. et al. Intercalibration of international and domestic 40Ar/39Ar dating standards. SCI CHINA SER D 49, 461–470 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-006-0461-y
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-006-0461-y