Skip to main content
Log in

Transport costs and China’s exports: Some empirical evidences

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a new panel data set covering exports of four Chinese port cities to 32 countries and Hong Kong over the period of 1997–2008, this paper extends the conventional gravity model to assess the impacts of transport costs and port efficiency on China’s exports. The results can be summarized as three main findings: (1) The improvements of port efficiency and reduction of road transport costs play a vital role in China’s export competitiveness in the global market. The coefficient estimates on them are relatively large, around 0.72 and −0.89, respectively; (2) The effect of transport costs and port efficiency on China-to-Asia exports significantly exceeds that on China-to-Europe and China-to-America exports; (3) The overall estimated elasticity of road, railroad and port measure is 1.66, which is almost three times that of the average wage of port cities. The empirical results provide strong evidences that upgrading China’s transport service networks should offer greater scope for maintaining and increasing its competitive edge in low cost productions. The findings offer some insights and priorities for government policy making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu L, Wang S Y, and Lai K K, Forecasting Chinas foreign trade volume with a kernel-based hybrid econometric-AI ensemble learning approach, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2008, 21(1): 1–19.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang H, Yan G L, and Xiao Y H, Symmetry in world trade network, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2009, 22(2): 280–290.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Carruthers R, Bajpai J N, and Hummels D, Trade and logistics: An East Asian perspective, Proceedings of East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 2003.

  4. Limao N and Venables A J, Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage and transport costs, The World Bank Economic Review, 2001, 15(3): 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blonigen B A and Wilson W W, New measures of port efficiency using international trade data, NBER working paper No. 12052, Cambridge, MA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark X, Dollar D, and Micco A, Port efficiency, maritime transport costs and bilateral trade, NBER working paper No. 10353, Cambridge, MA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson J S, Mann C L, and Otsuki T, Trade facilitation and economic development: a new approach to quantifying the impact, The World Bank Economic Review, 2003, 17(3): 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De P and Rout B, Transportation cost and trade competitiveness: Empirical evidence from India, Trade and Development Review, 2008, 1(2): 95–121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bougheas S, Demetriadesb P O, and Morgenrothc E L W, Infrastructure, transport costs, and trade, Journal of International Economics, 1999, 47: 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nordas H K, and Piermartini R, Infrastructure and trade, ERSD working paper No. 2004-04, Geneva, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hummels D, Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2007, 21(3): 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iwanow T and Kirkpatrick C, Trade facilitation and manufactured exports: Is Africa different?, World Development, 2009, 37(6): 1039–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Francois J and Manchin M, Institutional quality, infrastructure, and the propensity to export, Centre for Economic Policy Research working paper No. 2360, London, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brooks D and Menon J, Infrastructure and Trade in Asia, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blonigen B A and Wilson W W, International trade, transportation networks and port choice, http://www.corpsnets.us/docs/PortDevInternalTransport/PortChoice114.pdf, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ma L and Zhang J, Infrastructure development in a fast growing economy: The People’s Republic of China, Infrastructure’s Role in Lowering Asia’s Trade Costs (ed. by D.H. Brooks and D. Hummels), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tinbergen J, Shaping the World Economy, Twentieth Century Fund, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson J E and Van Wincoop E, Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle, American Economic Review, 2003, 93: 170–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Egger P, An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials, The World Economy, 2002, 25: 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiwari P, Itoh H, and Doi M, Shippers’ port and carrier selection behavior in China: A discrete choice analysis, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 2003, 5(1): 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hausman J A, Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica, 1978, 46(6): 1251–1271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Wooldridge J M, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Greene W, Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall, New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Friedman M, The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1937, 32: 675–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoechle D, Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence, The Stata Journal, 2007, 7(3): 281–312.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baier S L and Bergstrand J H, The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity, Journal of International Economics, 2001, 53: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bergstrand J H, The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, 71(1): 143–153.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Oguledo V I and MacPhee C R, Gravity models: A reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements, Applied Economics, 1994, 26(2): 107–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hummels D and Skiba A, Shipping the good apples out? an empirical confirmation of the Alchian-Allen conjecture, Journal of Political Economy, 2004, 112(6): 1384–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. You J H, Xie S Y, and Zhou Y, Two-stage estimation for seemingly unrelated nonparametric regression models, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2007, 20(4): 509–520.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xun Zhang.

Additional information

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71101142 and 70903067.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor Wang Shouyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, L., Fang, SC. & Zhang, X. Transport costs and China’s exports: Some empirical evidences. J Syst Sci Complex 26, 365–382 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-013-1259-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-013-1259-6

Keywords

Navigation