Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current status of educational technologies at Omani higher education institutions and their future prospective

  • INTERNATIONAL REVIEW
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to address the current and prospective views on educational technology (ET) in order to discover the difficulties and develop its utilization in Omani higher education. The main instruments used to carry out this research were two questionnaires: the faculty members’ questionnaire, and the technical/administrative staff questionnaire. One hundred and fifty-nine participants were involved in the study. They represented all educational technologists who have been with the public and private Omani higher education institutions. The findings show a tendency for future expansion with less expensive technologies and the need for training. Some impediments of ET use were also found. Important recommendations from this study include: the need to support Omani higher education institutions with technical and human resources to increase and activate the use/number of new instructional media and equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelraheem, A., & Al Musawi, A. (2003). Instructional uses of internet services by SQU faculty members (Part2). International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(2), 163–176. Retrieved May 15, 2006 from http://static.highbeam.com/i/internationaljournalofinstructionalmedia/january012003/instructionalusesofinternetservicesbysultanqaboosu/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu Jaber, M., & Osman, M. (1996). Utilization of instructional technology services by faculty members at Sultan Qaboos University. International Yearbook on Teacher Education (ICET): 1996 proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 13–21) Amman, Jordan.

  • Akinyemi, A., & Al Musawi, A. (2002). Re-orientating instructional development practice in higher education: A case of Sultan Qaboos University. In W. Kelliny (Ed.), Surveys in linguistics and language teaching III, e-learning and e-research, European University Studies Journal, XXI (112), 29–37, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Al Hajri, M. (2000). The learning resources centers at Ibra technical industrial college: Performance evaluation. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Sheffield, UK.

  • Al Khawaldi, H. (2000). Faculty perceptions towards ET status at Omani colleges of education. Unpublished MA thesis, Yarmouk University, Jordan.

  • Al Musawi, A. (2002). The existing formats and functions of media units in the Omani higher education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, Bahrain University, 3(2), 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Musawi, A., & Abdelraheem, A. (2004a). E-learning at Sultan Qaboos University: Status and future. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 363–367, Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.blackwell-ynergy.com/links/doi/10.1111/j. 0007–1013.2004.00394.x/abs/().

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Musawi, A., & Abdelraheem, A. (2004b). The effect of using on-line instruction on Sultan Qaboos University students’ achievement and their attitudes towards it. Education Journal, Kuwait University, 18(70), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Musawi, A., & Akinyemi, A. (2002). Issues and prospects of e-learning in Oman, proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2002-world conference on educational multimedia. Hypermedia & Telecommunications, 1, 17–18, Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.aace.org/dl/index.cfm/fuseaction/ViewPaper/id/10017/toc/yes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Rawahy, H. (2001). E-learning: A telecommunications perspective. In Educational technology symposium/exhibition 2001 proceedings, SQU.

  • Bialo, E., & Soloman, G. (1997). Open your eyes: The evidence is there! Technology and Learning, 18(2), 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, E. (1997). Training-on-demand: A model for technology staff development. Educational Technology, 37(4), 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrom, E., & Bingham, M. (2001). Factors influencing the effective use of technology for teaching and learning: Lessons learned from the SEIR-TEC intensive site schools (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED471140), Retrieved Oct 26, 2006, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/27/cd/5c.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2003). Young children and technology: What does the research say? Young Children, 58(6), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola, E. (2004). Powering up: Learning to teach well with technology. NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn D., Higgins K., & Boone R. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of special education technology research and practice. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. (2005). Tracking U.S. trends: There is now almost no difference in the availability of Internet access between poor schools and wealthy ones. Education Week, 24(35), 40–42, Retrieved Oct 26, 2006, from http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:Ap2zZWdvb7UJ:www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/05/05/35tracking.h24.html+National+Center+for+Education+Statistics+internet+fox+2005&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, R. D., & Savenye, S. (1993). Technology in the classroom: The teacher’s new role and resistance to it. Educational Technology, 33(6), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kook, J. (1997). Computers and communication networks in educational settings in the twenty-first century: Preparation for educator’s new roles. Educational Technology, 37(2), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. (2002). School mathematics and science programs benefit from instructional technology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Retrieved June 25, 2004, from http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/infbrief/nsf03301/start.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language Learning. The Internet TESL Journal, VI (12), Retrieved Oct. 26, 2006, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html.

  • Trotter, A. (1997). A test of leadership, education week on the Web, Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.edweek.org/sreports/tc/admin/ad-n.htm.

  • Viadero, D. (1997). A tool for learning, education week on the Web, Retrieved May 13, 2006, from http://www.edweek.org/sreports/tc/class/cl-n.htm.

  • Waxman, H., Connell, M., & Gray, J. (2002). A quantitative synthesis of recent research on the effects of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved Oct. 13, 2003 from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects/effects.pdf.

  • Waxman, H., Lin, M., & Michko, M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Learning Point Associates, The North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), Retrieved Sept. 26, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects2/waxman.pdf.

  • Zehr, M. (1997). Teaching the teachers, education week on the Web, Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://www.edweek.org/sreports/tc/teach/te-n.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali S. Al-Musawi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Musawi, A.S. Current status of educational technologies at Omani higher education institutions and their future prospective. Education Tech Research Dev 55, 395–410 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9041-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9041-x

Keywords

Navigation