Abstract
For a long time within the history of education, it has been assumed that science classrooms are homogeneous spaces, constituted with the prevailing conception that only scientific culture can be represented. At the same time, Latin America is characterized by being a region with enormous biological and cultural diversity, with an invaluable biocultural heritage. Building on an interpretative hermeneutical analysis of science teachers’ discourses from Brazil and Colombia, we explore the potential of science education to engage with the cultural diversity in science classrooms through the lens of Freire’s concept of dialogue. Developing the concept of intercultural dialogue, we identify the teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science (NOS), and how they perceive the relationship between scientific and nonscientific knowledge that students bring with them in the process of science teaching and learning. This approach denotes potential tensions and challenges to incorporating and interpreting different knowledge, but it is a necessary process in the development of an emancipatory intercultural, non-dualist, nonhierarchical education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077
Aikenhead, G. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:23.0.CO;2-1
Bakhtin, M. (1999). El problema de los géneros discursivos. En: Estética de la creación verbal. Siglo XXI.
Baptista, G. C. S. (2012). Elaboração de materiais didáticos como apoio ao diálogo entre saberes no ensino de biologia nas escolas de campo. Revista Iberoamericana de educação, 60(4), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie6041293
Baptista, G. C. S. (2018). Tables of contextual cognition: A proposal for intercultural research in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13, 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9807-3
Baptista, G. C. S., & Nascimento, J. G. (2017). Formación de profesores de ciencias para el diálogo intercultural: Análisis de un caso. Ens. Pesqui. Educ. Ciênc., 19, 420–441. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172017190124
Baptista, G. C. S., & Molina-Andrade, A. (2021). Science teachers’ conceptions about the importance of teaching and how to teach western science to students from traditional communities. Human Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00257-4
Baptista, G. C. S., Robles-Piñeros, J., & dos Santos, M. F. (2020). O uso dos contos para o diálogo intercultural e letramento científico no ensino de ciências. Revista de Educação, Ciências e Matemática, 10(2), 1–17.
Bicker, A., Sillitoe, P., & Pottier, J. (2004). Development and local knowledge. Routledge.
Bizzo, N. (2000). Ciências: fácil ou difícil? Editora Ática.
Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. Routledge.
Buber, M. (2012). Eu e Tu. Centauro.
Carvalho, E. M. C., & Gil-Pérez, D. (2003). Formação de professores de ciências. Cortez.
Cassiani, S. (2018). Reflexões sobre os efeitos da transnacionalização de currículos e da colonialidade do saber/poder em cooperações internacionais: Foco na educação em ciências. Ciência & Educação, 24(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320180010015
Cassiani, S., & Pereira, P. (2021). Dialogicidade freireana: um contraponto na formação docente intercultural. Ensino, Saúde e Ambiente, 14(Especial), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.22409/resa2021.v14iesp.a51087
Chartier, R. (1990). História Cultural: entre práticas e representações. Bertrand.
Cobern, W. W. (1994). World view, culture, and science education. Science Education International, 5(4), 5–8.
Cobern, W. W. (1996). Constructivism and non-western science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180303
Cobern, W. W. (2004). Apples and oranges: A rejoinder to Smith and Siegel. Science & Education, 13(6), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCED.0000042856.33782.7b
Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2001). Defining science in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:13.0.CO;2-G
Costa, V. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790306
Devetak, S., Glažar, A., & Vogrinc, J. (2010). The role of qualitative research in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75229
Diegues, A. C., & Arruda, R. S. V. (2001). Saberes tradicionais e biodiversidade no Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
El-Hani, C. N., & Sepulveda, C. (2010). The relationship between science and religion in the education of protestant biology preservice teachers in a Brazilian university. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9212-7
Freire, P. (1974, April 23). When I met Marx I continued to meet Christ on the corner of the street. Interview with Barry Hill. The Age Newspaper, 21.
Freire, P. (1983). Extensão ou comunicação? Paz e Terra.
Freire, P. (1990). La naturaleza política de la educación. Paidós.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogía de la esperanza. Un reencuentro con la Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogía de la autonomía. Siglo XXI editores.
Freire, P. (2004). Cartas a quien pretende enseñar. Siglo XXI.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogia do Oprimido. Paz e Terra.
Freire, P. (2007). La educación como práctica de la libertad. Siglo XXI.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Geertz, C. (1989). Interpretação das culturas. Editora Afiliada.
Gentili, P. (2009). Marchas y contramarchas. El derecho a la educación y las dinámicas de exclusión incluyente en América Latina (a sesenta años de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos). Revista Iberoamericana De Educación, 49, 19–57. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie490673
Gómez-Arévalo, A. (2010). Ideas y pensamientos educativos en América Latina: De la escolástica colonial al posneoliberalismo educativo. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 40(2), 115–152.
Illich, I. (1974). En América Latina ¿Para qué sirve la escuela? Talleres Gráficos Honegger.
Kampourakis, K. (2014). Understanding evolution. Cambridge University Press.
Kimmerer, R. W. (2012). Searching for synergy: Integrating traditional and scientific ecological knowledge in environmental science education. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4(2), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0091-y
Kirylo, J. D., & Boyd, D. (2017). Paulo Freire. Brill.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.
Leff, E. (2003). Racionalidad ambiental y diálogo de saberes: Sentidos y senderos de un futuro sustentable. Desenvolvimento e meio Ambiente, 7, 13–40.
Léo Neto, N. A. (2021). Divulgação e Educação Científica Racista no Boletim de Eugenia (1929–1933): Uma Análise Crítica com Vistas a Contribuir para uma Educação em Ciências Contemporânea. Revista Brasileira De Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2021u351381
Ludwig, D., Banuoku, D. F., Boogard, B., El-Hani, C. N., Guri, B. Y., Kramm, M., Renck, V., Ressiore, A., Robles-Piñeros, J. E., & Turska, J. (in press). Ontologies of the south. In: A. Buskell (Ed.), Cultures and ontology. Routledge.
Ludwig, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2020). Philosophy of ethnobiology: Understanding knowledge integration and its limitations. Journal of Ethnobiology, 40(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-40.1.3
Mclaren, P. (1995). Critical Pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. Routledge.
McLaren, P., & Giroux, H. (1995). Radical pedagogy as cultural politics: Beyond the discourse of critique and anti-utopianism. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era (pp. 29–57). Routledge.
McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2018). Paulo Freire and liberation theology: The Christian consciousness of critical pedagogy. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Pädagogik, 94(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.30965/25890581-09402006
Molina-Andrade, A. (2014). Concepciones de los profesores sobre el fenómeno de la diversidad cultural y sus implicaciones en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Molina-Andrade, A. (2017). Algunas aproximaciones a una perspectiva intercultural: Entre discursos generales de la educación y específicos centrados en la naturaleza de lo que se quiere enseñar. Tecné Episteme Y Didaxis TED, 42, 7–21.
Monceri, F. (2014). Taking diversity seriously: On the notion of intercultural philosophy. In W. Sweet (Ed.), What is intercultural philosophy? (pp. 81–94). The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Peñaloza, G. (2021). Buenas madres y esposas: Las ciencias naturales escolares y la formación de la mujer en Colombia. In F. Bernabé, C. Abreu, S. Caponi, & A. Oliva (Eds.), A filosofia das ciências sociais na América do Sul/Ciencia, género(s) y feminismo(s) (pp. 187–201). Asociación de Filosofía e Historia de la Ciencia del Cono Sur.
Reiss, M. J. (2013). Religion in science education. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity (pp. 317–328). Springer.
Robles-Piñeros, J., & Baptista, G. C. S. (2022). Conocimiento entomológico local en la enseñanza de la ecología: Contribuciones para una educación científica intercultural. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 21(1), 70–89.
Robles-Piñeros, J., Ludwig, D., Baptista, G., & Molina-Andrade, A. (2020). Intercultural science education as a trading zone between traditional and academic knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 84, 11337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2020.101337
Robles-Piñeros, J., Melo, A., & Baptista, G. C. S. (2021). Conhecimentos tradicionais: Concepções de Pós-graduandos e implicações para o ensino de ciências. In G. Baptista, P. Pinheiro, & L. Santos (Eds.), Educação científica por meio da interculturalidade de saberes e práticas. EDUFBA.
Roth, M. (2013). Activity, subjectification, and personality: Science education from a diversity-of-life perspective. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity (pp. 41–64). Springer.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.
Santos, B. S. (2010). Para além do pensamento abissal: Das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes. In B. S. Santos & M. P. Meneses (Eds.), Epistemologias do sul (pp. 23–71). Almedina/CES.
Santos, B. S. (2015). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
Sepulveda, C., & El-Hani, C. N. (2004). Quando visões de mundo se encontram: Religião e ciência na trajetória de formação de alunos protestantes de uma licenciatura em ciências biológicas. Investigações Em Ensino de Ciências, 9(2), 137–175.
Southerland, S. A. (2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science & Education, 9(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008676109903
Toledo, V., & Barrera-Bassols, P. (2009). A etnoecologia: Uma ciência pós-normal que estuda as sabedorias tradicionais. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 20, 31–45.
Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction. Princeton University Press.
Udías, A. (2010). Ciencia y religion. Dos visiones del mundo. Sal Terrae.
Viertler, R. B. (2002). Métodos antropológicos como ferramenta para estudos em etnobiologia e etnoecologia. In M. C. Amoroso (Ed.), Métodos de coleta e análise de dados em etnobiologia, etnoecologia e disciplinas correlatas (pp. 11–29). SUNESP/CNPQ.
Vila Merino, E. S., Sierra Nieto, J. E., & Álvarez Jiménez, V. E. (2021). Freire como pedagogo intercultural: diálogo, alteridad y lectura crítica del mundo. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 38, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2021.38.005
Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Buenos Aires: Grijalbo.
Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. SAGE Publications.
Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29, 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This manuscript is a part of the special issue Reflecting on Freire: A praxis of radical love and critical hope for science education, guest edited by Betzabe Torres Olave, Sara Tolbert, and Alejandra Frausto Aceves.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Peñaloza, G., Robles-Piñeros, J. & Baptista, G.C.S. Science education and cultural diversity: Freire’s concept of dialogue as theoretical lens to study the classroom discourse of science teachers. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 18, 95–114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10158-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10158-3