Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Developing teacher professionalism for teaching socio-scientific issues: What and how should teachers learn?

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary reinterprets the findings of Macalalag, Johnson, and Lai’s study in terms of the substantive content of and ways of initiating professional development for teaching socio-scientific issues. First, regarding professional development content, we introduce the concept of SSI-PCK, which refers to pedagogical content knowledge for teaching socio-scientific issues. From the perspective of SSI-PCK, the teacher education program designed by Macalalag and his colleagues contributed to shaping the “orientation for teaching SSIs,” which is an overarching component of SSI-PCK. Second, regarding how to implement teacher education, we examine the key features of strategies to enhance effective professional development. Among the various activities of Macalag et al.’s teacher education program, the cultural practices provided by the field study encouraged the participant teachers to understand the importance of SSIs as learners, thinkers, and reflective practitioners. Finally, educational implications are suggested for organizing further professional development for educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(Lee 2016)

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, L., Marland, H., Pill, A., & Rea, T. (2010). School culture and postgraduate professional development: Delineating the ‘enabling school’. Professional Development in Education,36(3), 471–489. Retrieved on March 1, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250903126043.

  • Desimone, L. M. (2003). Toward a more refined theory of school effects: A study of the relationship between professional community and mathematic teaching in early elementary school. In C. Miskel & W. Hoy (Eds.), Research and theory in educational administration. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher,38(3), 181–199. Retrieved on March 21, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.

  • Eastwood, J. L., Schlegel, W. M., & Cook, K. L. (2011). Effects of an interdisciplinary program on students’ reasoning with socioscientific issues and perceptions of their learning experiences. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 89–126). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials in respect to socioscientific issues. Science and Education,17(8–9), 829–854. Retrieved on March 13, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9080-z.

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal,38(4), 915–945. Retrieved on March 22, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915.

  • Lee, H. (2016). Conceptualization of an SSI-PCK framework for teaching socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,36(4), 539–550. Retrieved on February 27, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0539.

  • Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009). Science teachers’ inspiration for teaching socio-scientific issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education,31(7), 931–960. Retrieved on March 21, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801898903.

  • Lee, H., & Yang, J. E. (2017). Science teachers taking their first steps toward teaching socioscientific issues through collaborative action research. Research in Science Education,34, 1–21. Retrieved on February 5, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9614-6.

  • Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record,105(6), 913–945. Retrieved on March 04, 2019 from https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=11544.

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education,21(5), 509–523. Retrieved on March 23, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006.

  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education,89(1), 71–93. Retrieved on December 27, 2018 from https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023.

  • Supovitz, J., & Turner, H. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(9), 963–980. Retrieved on March 21, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0.

  • Van Dijk, E. M. (2014). Understanding the heterogeneous nature of science: A comprehensive notion of PCK for scientific literacy. Science Education,98(3), 397–411. Retrieved on March 21, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21110.

  • Zeidler, D. L., Applebaum, S. M., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Enacting a socioscientific issues classroom: Transformative transformations. Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 277–305). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Jina Chang

  2. Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea

    Jisun Park

Authors
  1. Jina Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jisun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jisun Park.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead Editor: M. Kim.

This review essay addresses issues raised in Augusto Z. Macalalag, Joseph Johnson, and Michelle Lai’s paper entitled: How do we do this: learning how to teach socioscientifc issues (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09944-9).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, J., Park, J. Developing teacher professionalism for teaching socio-scientific issues: What and how should teachers learn?. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 15, 423–431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09955-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09955-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation