Abstract
Zoo signs are important for informal learning, but their effect on visitor perception of animals has been sparsely studied. Other studies have established the importance of informal learning in American society; this study discusses zoo signs in the context of such learning. Through the lens of Critical Theory framed by informal learning, and by applying critical discourse analysis, I discovered subtle institutional power on zoo signs. This may influence visitors through dominant ideological discursive formations and emergent discourse objects, adding to the paradox of “saving” wild animals while simultaneously oppressing them. Signs covering a variety of species from two different United States-accredited zoos were analyzed. Critical Theory looks to emancipate oppressed human populations; here I apply it zoo animals. As physical emancipation is not practical, I define emancipation in the sociological sense—in this case, freedom from silence. Through this research, perhaps we can find a way to represent animals as living beings who have their own lives and voices, by presenting them honestly, with care and compassion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. D., Tran, L. U., Gupta, P., & CreedonOHurley, H. (2008). Sociocultural frameworks of conceptual change: Implications for teaching and learning in museums. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 435–449. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9101-5.
Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13, 367–383. doi:10.1080/13504620701430604.
Beardsworth, A., & Bryman, A. (2001). The wild animal in late modernity: The case of the Disneyization of zoos. Tourist Studies, 1(1), 83–104. doi:10.1177/146879760100100105.
Beri, V., Tanent, A., & Abelson, P. (2010). The economic and social contribution of the zoological industry in Australia. International Zoo Yearbook, 44, 192–200. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.2009.00104.x.
Bielick, S., & Karns, D. (1998). Still thinking about thinking: A telephone follow-up study of visitors to the think tank exhibition at the national zoological park. Institutional Studies Office of the Smithsonian Institution Report, 98–5, 1–33.
Bohman, J. (2010). Critical Theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Spring 2010. Retrieved 11 Nov 2011, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/critical-theory/.
Brown, J. (Undated). Potential treatments for reproductive problems in elephants. The smithsonian institution. Retrieved 06 May 2012, from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:QwVE-nwNKoMJ:www.elephantcare.org/protodoc_files/new+06/ElephantReprodTreatmentSummary_06.pdf+reproductive+problems+elephants&hl=en&gl=us.
Burnie, D., & Wilson, D. E. (Eds.). (2001). Smithsonian institution animal: The definitive visual guide to the world’s wildlife. New York: Dorling Kindersley Publishing.
Davey, G. (2006). Visitor behavior in zoos: A review. Anthrozoos, 19(2), 143–157. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.2009.00104.x.
Dierking, L. D. (1997). Guest editorial: Introduction. Science Education, 81(6), 629–631. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199711)81:6<629:AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-K.
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2010). The 95 percent solution: School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98(6), 486–496. doi:10.1511/2010.87.486.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Falk, J. H. (1999). Museums as Institutions for personal learning. The MIT Press and the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, Summer, 1999, 259–275.
Fogelberg, K., & Ferrell, S. T. (2010). Vasculitis secondary to presumptive leptospirosis treated with long-term corticosteroids in a captive lesser kudu (Tragelaphus imberbis australis). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 41(3), 542–544. doi:10.1638/2009-0197.1.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and on the discourse language. New York: Vintage Books.
Fraser, J., Bicknell, J., Sickler, J., & Taylor, A. (2009). What information do zoo and aquarium visitors want on animal identification labels? Journal of Interpretation Research, 14(2), 7–19.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
Grandin, T. (2005). Animals in translation: Using the mysteries of autism to decode animal behavior. New York: Scribner.
Groff, A., Lockhart, D., Ogden, J., & Dierking, L. D. (2005). An exploratory investigation of the effect of working in an environmentally themed facility on the conservation-related knowledge, attitudes and behavior or staff. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 371–387. doi:10.1080/13504620500081384.
Guggiesberg, C. A. (1975). Wild cats of the world. New York: Taplinger Publishing Company.
Holland, D. C., & Valsiner, J. (1988). Cognition, symbols, and Vygotsky’s developmental psychology. Ethos, 16(3), 247–272.
Horkheimer, M. (2002). Critical theory: Selected essays. New York: Continuum.
Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T.W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Edited by Noerr, G.S. and translated by Jephcott, E. USA: Stanford University Press.
International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Accessed 04 Apr 2012. www.IUCN.org.
Luke, A. (1995-1996). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21, 3–48.
Mattingly, C., Lutkehaus, N. C., & Throop, J. C. (2008). Bruner’s search for meaning: A conversation between psychology and anthropology. Ethos, 36(1), 1–28.
Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosely, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365–416.
Sunquist, M., & Sunquist, F. (2002). Wild cats of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tapia, J. M. (2008). Poking holes in the oil paintings: The case for critical theory in postmodern art museum education. Visual Arts Research, 34(2), 35–44.
Van Oers, B., Wardekker, W., Elbers, E., & Van Der Veer, R. (Eds.). (2008). The transformation of learning: Advances in cultural-historical activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: L. Bencze.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fogelberg, K. Unsilencing voices: a study of zoo signs and their language of authority. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 9, 787–799 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9566-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9566-8