Abstract
The feature article discussed in this forum presents an interesting description of how students work in the context of a virtual world, where they design phenomena that they subsequently investigate by analyzing graphical representations. The study is aligned with the current canon of science education interested in understanding the inter-psychological and intra-psychological determinants of learning. Its main focus is on “meaning making.” In this contribution to the forum, I articulate some shortcomings inherent in this theoretical notion, which, in essence, hides rather than reveals the real issues in and of learning. I offer some alternative avenues, both theoretical and methodological, for framing pertinent issues; in so doing, I (endeavor to) open up new avenues for research in science education. In essence, therefore, I offer possible avenues in response to the question, “What more can there be done by science education research?” that would allow us to eschew what I perceive to be hidden contradictions that interfere with making theoretical and practical advances in our field.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
I tend to translate Heidegger’s term “Bedeutung” into English using the term “signification” (as one recent translation of the work), but many scholars, drawing on an older translation of the work, use the term “meaning.”
In the Russian text cited here, Vygotsky sometimes uses the equivalent of “societal” (i.e., obshchestvennij) sometimes the equivalent of “social” (i.e., sozial’nij) to refer to the relations. English translations tend to (inappropriately) translate both Russian words using the same adjective “social.”
References
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris workshop). In P. Bourdieu & L. J. D. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 217–260). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (1988). Limited inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (First published in 1977).
Derrida, J. (1990). Le problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl [The problem of genesis in Husserl's philosophy]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
Husserl, E. (1995). Cartesianische Meditationen [Cartesian meditations]. Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner. (First published in 1950).
Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers.
Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits [Écrits]. Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil.
Leontjew, A. N. (1982). Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit [Activity, consciousness, personality]. Köln, Germany: Pahl-Rugenstein.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1958). Werke band 3 [works vol. 3]. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
Mikhailov, F. T. (2002). The “other within” for the psychologist. Journal for Russian and East European Psychology, 39, 6–31.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232.
Smith, D. E. (2000). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Teaching to learn: A view from the field. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Vygotskij, L. S. (2005). ПCИXOЛOГИЯ PAЗBИTИЯ ЧEЛOBEКA [Psychology of human development]. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo.
Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations. Oxford, England: Blackwell. (First published in 1953).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The review essay is a critique of Krange I., & Arnseth H. C., Students’ meaning making in science: solving energy resource problems in virtual worlds combined with spreadsheets to develop graphs. Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11422-011-9361-3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roth, WM. On the hunt for elusive “meanings”. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 7, 607–626 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9392-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9392-4