Abstract
In this commentary, I first consider what Oliveira defines inquiry-based science instruction to be. Next I discuss what the discourse practices are that he is advocating. Then I examine what he presents as evidence of changes in two teachers’ discourse practices due to a summer institute and how their pragmatic awareness seems to have been enhanced through institute activities. Finally I ponder whether, when, how, and why professional development should include a focus on ways of speaking during inquiry-based science instruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ash, D., & Kluger-Bell, B. (1999). Identifying inquiry in the K-5 classroom. In Snyder, S. (Ed.), Foundations volume II: A monograph for professionals in science, mathematics, and technology education: Inquiry, thoughts, views, and strategies for the K-5 classroom (pp. 79–85). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27, 241–267.
Hammer, D., & van Zee, E. H. (2006). Seeing the science in children’s thinking. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Iedema, R. (1996). Save the talk for after the listening: The realization of regulative discourse in teacher talk. Language and Education, 10, 82–103.
Iwasyk, M. (1997). Kids questioning kids: ‘Experts’ sharing. Science Children, 35(1), 42–46. Reprinted in Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. H. (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching (pp. 130–138). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved 22 December 2008 from Part II: http://www.aaas.org/programs/education/about_ehr/pubs/inquiry.shtml.
Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. H. (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved 22 December 2008 from http://www.aaas.org/programs/education/about_ehr/pubs/inquiry.shtml.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved 22 December 2008 from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4962.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved 22 December 2008 from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9596.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades k-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved 22 December 2008 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11625.
Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43–50.
van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159–190.
Volkmann, M. J., & Zgagacz, M. (2004). Learning to teach physics through inquiry: The lived experience of a graduate teaching assistant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 584–602.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Zee, E.H. Should professional development include analyzing and coaching ways of speaking during inquiry-based science instruction in elementary classrooms?. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 4, 847–854 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9220-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9220-7