Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond payoff diagrams: how to present risk and return characteristics of structured products

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The market for structured products in Germany and Switzerland experienced a decade of rapid growth before the financial crisis. When Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, however, it became apparent that many private investors had not been aware of the risks involved in these certificates. There is evidence that the success of some of the most popular products was due to behavioral biases of investors. There is also concern that the complexity and diversity of the products was accompanied by low transparency. In practice, the information provided to investors is still often focused on payoff diagrams. For the future development of the market, it is important to improve investors’ information and understanding. To this end, this paper analyzes the information requirements and proposes a risk and return survey to provide relevant and comprehensive information on market risk. Specifically, we propose to (1) illustrate the return probability distribution in three different ways, in particular a rolling dice analogy, (2)  apply the Leland model to specify the risk and return tradeoff, and (3) include a specific measure of active risk. We illustrate these measures and information tools for a sample of stylized products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C., Korovilas, D.: The hazards of volatility diversification. Working Paper ICMA Centre, Henley Business School at Reading (2011)

  • Amin, G., Kat, H.: Hedge fund performance 1990–2000: Do the “money machines” really add value? J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 38(2), 251–274 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, G., Erev, I.: Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 16, 215–233 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S., Thaler, R.: Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Manag. Sci. 45, 364–381 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S., Thaler, R.: Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 79–98 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benet, B., Giannetti, A., Pissaris, S.: Gains from structured product markets: The case of reverse-exchangeable securities (RES). J. Bank. Finance 30(1), 111–132 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C., Boyle, P.: Explicit representation of cost-efficient strategies. Working Paper University of Waterloo (2010)

  • Bernard, C., Maj, M., Vanduffel, S.: Improving the design of financial products in a multidimensional Black–Scholes market. Working Paper Universiteit Brussel (2010)

  • Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.: Can psychological aggregation manipulations affect portfolio risk-taking? Evidence from a framed field experiment. Working Paper Harvard University, Yale University and NBER (2009)

  • Blümke, A.: How to Invest in Structured Products. Wiley, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Branger, N., Breuer, B.: The optimal demand for retail derivatives. Working Paper University of Münster (2008)

  • Breeden, D., Litzenberger, R.: Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices. J. Bus. 51, 621–651 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M.: The pricing of contingent claims in discrete time models. J. Finance 24, 53–68 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, W., Perst, A.: Retail banking and behavioral financial engineering: The case of structured products. J. Bank. Finance 31(3), 827–844 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burth, S., Kraus, T., Wohlwend, H.: The pricing of structured products in the Swiss market. J. Deriv. 8(Winter), 30–40 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, P., Wu, L.: Variance risk premiums. Rev. Financ. Stud. 22, 1311–1341 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., Leland, H.: On dynamic investment strategies. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 24, 1859–1880 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P.: Distributional analysis of portfolio choice. J. Bus. 61, 369–393 (1988a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P.: Inefficient dynamic portfolio strategies or how to throw away a million dollars in the stock market. Rev. Financ. Stud. 1(1), 67–88 (1988b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, K., Kvaloy, O.: Do financial advisors exhibit myopic loss aversion? Financ. Mark. Portf. Manag. 24(2), 159–170 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.: Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. J. Finance 25, 383–418 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C., Hadar, L.: “Decisions from experience” = sampling error + prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber and Erev (2004). Judgm. Decis. Mak. 1, 159–161 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbichler, A., Wohlwend, H.: The valuation of structured products: Empirical findings for the Swiss market. Financ. Mark. Portf. Manag. 19(4), 361–380 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, R., Wallmeier, M.: Volatility as an asset class: European evidence. Eur. J. Finance 13(7), 621–644 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, R., Wallmeier, M.: Optimal investments in volatility. Financ. Mark. Portf. Manag. 22, 147–167 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haisley, E., Kaufmann, C., Weber, M.: How much risk can i handle? The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one’s investment risk appetite and comprehension. Working Paper Yale School of Management and University of Mannheim (2010)

  • Hau, R., Pleskac, T., Kiefer, J., Hertwig, R.: The description-experience gap in risky choice: The role of sample size and experienced probabilities. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 21, 493–518 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, H., Leland, H.: On equilibrium asset price processes. Rev. Financ. Stud. 6, 593–617 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, B., Pearson, N.: The dark side of financial innovation. Working Paper George Washington University (2009)

  • Hens, T., Rieger, M.: The dark side of the moon: structured products from the customer’s perspective. Working Paper University of Zurich (2008)

  • Hernandez, R., Lee, W., Liu, P.: An economic analysis of reverse exchangeable securities—an option-pricing approach. Working Paper University of Arkansas (2007)

  • Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E., Erev, I.: Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychol. Sci. 15, 534–539 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, J.: Theory of Financial Decision Making. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P.: Value at Risk. McGraw-Hill, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5(4), 297–323 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klos, A., Weber, E., Weber, M.: Investment decisions and time horizon: Risk perception and risk behavior in repeated gambles. Manag. Sci. 51, 1777–1790 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H.: Beyond mean-variance: Performance measurement in a nonsymmetrical world. Financ. Anal. J. 55, 27–36 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, T., Seiz, R.: Pricing (multi-) barrier reverse convertibles. Working Paper University of St. Gallen (2008)

  • Meier, M., Vanini, P., Béguelin, P., Manser, D., Wasescha, E.: Die Welt der Strukturierten Produkte—Das Buch zur SVSP Swiss Derivative Map. Finanz und Wirtschaft, Zurich (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.: Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Rev. Econ. Stat. 51, 247–257 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakow, T., Demes, K., Newell, B.: Biased samples not mode of presentation: Re-examining the apparent underweighting of rare events in experience-based choice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 106, 168–179 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakow, T., Newell, B.: Degrees of uncertainty: An overview and framework for future research on experience-based choice. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 23, 1–14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, M.: Optionen, Derivate und strukturierte Produkte. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, M.: Probability misestimation and preferences in financial investment decision. J. Behav. Finance (2011, to appear)

  • Röder, K., Wilkens, S.: Reverse convertibles and discount certificates in the case of constant and stochastic volatilities. Financ. Mark. Portf. Manag. 17(1), 76–102 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, M.: The valuation of uncertain income streams and the pricing of options. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 7, 407–425 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, C., Wasserfallen, W.: Portfolio insurance for the small investor in Switzerland. J. Deriv. 3(Spring), 37–43 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, H., Statman, M.: Behavioral aspects of the design and marketing of financial products. Financ. Manag. 22(Summer), 123–134 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoimenov, P.A., Wilkens, S.: Are structured products “fairly” priced? An analysis of the German market for equity-linked instruments. J. Bank. Finance 29(12), 2971–2993 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanowska, M., Horst, J., Veld, C.: Reverse convertible bonds analyzed. Working Paper University of Rotterdam (2007)

  • Treynor, J., Black, F.: How to use security analysis to improve portfolio selection. J. Bus. 46, 66–86 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanduffel, S., Chernih, A., Maj, M., Schoutens, W.: A note on the suboptimality of path-dependent pay-offs in Lévy markets. Appl. Math. Finance 16(4), 315–330 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallmeier, M., Diethelm, M.: Market pricing of exotic structured products: The case of multi-asset barrier reverse convertibles in Switzerland. J. Deriv. 17(2), 59–72 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallmeier, M., Diethelm, M.: Multivariate downside risk: Normal versus variance gamma. J. Futures Mark. (2011, to appear)

  • Wilkens, S., Erner, C., Röder, K.: The pricing of structured products in Germany. J. Deriv. 10(Fall), 55–68 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Wallmeier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallmeier, M. Beyond payoff diagrams: how to present risk and return characteristics of structured products. Financ Mark Portf Manag 25, 313–338 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-011-0163-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-011-0163-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation