Abstract
Karen Simecek’s Philosophy of Lyric Voice aims to explore certain complexities in our ideas about the ‘lyric I’ in lyric poetry, and the relation of the lyric I to notions including expression, perspective, and voice. I discuss some of the connections Simecek draws between these notions, and how she seems to understand them. I also express some doubt or hesitation about certain elements of her position: in particular, her apparent assumption that a perspective, in the relevant sense, must be unified, and hence that lyric poems must also be unified in a certain sense. These topics are connected with the fact that one of the things lyric poetry does is to focus our attention on language itself. I ask just what this might mean, and suggest that it is part of an attempt to undermine a common but naïve view of language that sees language as transparent and, in its essential nature, disembodied.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Notes
Retrieved from https://archive.emilydickinson.org/correspondence/higginson/l268.html, December 12, 2024.
Although she offers this as a gloss on Will Harris’s statements about poetry and perspective, I take it that Simecek endorses these statements and intends them to express her own position.
References
Alva Noë, The Entanglement: How Art and Philosophy Make Us What We Are (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2023), 87–88.
Charles Taylor, “Theories of Meaning” (1980). Man and World 13, 281–302.
Simecek, Karen. (2024) Philosophy of Lyric Voice: The Cognitive Value of Page and Performance Poetry. Bloomsbury Academic.
Williams, C.K. (1987) “Poetry and Consciousness,” American Poetry Review January / February 1987, 27–30.
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
There is one author, Troy Jollimore (T.J.). T.J. did everything.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jollimore, T. Comment on Karen Simecek, Philosophy of Lyric Voice. Philosophia (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-025-00819-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-025-00819-8