Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of biogas slurry application on peanut yield, soil nutrients, carbon storage, and microbial activity in an Ultisol soil in southern China

  • Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Biogas slurry (BS) was known to influence soil–plant ecosystems when applied as a fertilizer, especially in combination with a chemical fertilizer (CF). Limited information was available regarding how this combination of BS–CF actually affected the soil–plant ecosystems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of BS–CF combinations on peanut yield, soil properties, and carbon (C) storage in a red soil (Ultisol) in southern China.

Materials and methods

The soil was fertilized with five treatments, including a control (T1), CF-only (T2) treatment, and three treatments with different BS–CF combinations (T3–T5). The final quantities of N/P2O5/K2O applied in T2–T5 were 120:90:135 kg ha−1. In T3–T5, 15 % (18 kg ha−1), 30 % (36 kg ha−1), and 45 % (54 kg ha−1) of total N (TN), respectively, were applied with BS and the remaining TN was applied with CF. Crop yield, soil nutrients, C storage, and microbial activity were determined through field and laboratory experiments.

Results and discussion

In the field experiment, peanut grain yields of T3–T5 were higher than those of T1 (44.5–55.7 %) and T2 (10.8–19.4 %), with the highest yield from T4 (3588 kg ha−1). The relationship between BS–TN inputs and peanut grain yield conformed to the linear-quadratic equation: y = −1.14x 2 + 59.1x + 2988 (R 2 = 0.98). The biomasses of peanut plants, at the flowering, pod production, and harvesting stages, were higher in T4 compared with those in T1 and T2. Moreover, T4 produced higher soil N and P (total and available) concentrations at the pod production and harvesting stages relative to other treatments, with increased soil microbial biomass C and N, and enhanced dehydrogenase and urease activities, at the flowering, pod production, and harvesting stages. Data from the incubation experiment were fitted to a first-order kinetic model, which showed that although the application of BS increased potentially mineralizable C, the additional C seemed to slowly degrade, and so would be retained in the soil for a longer period.

Conclusions

A BS–CF combination increased peanut grain yield and biomass, due to increases in soil N and P availability, microbial biomass C and N concentrations, and urease and dehydrogenase activities. Moreover, the organic C retention time in the red soil was extended. Combined application of BS–CF at a suitable ratio (36 kg BS–TN ha−1), together with proper management practices, could be effective to improve the quality and nutrient balance of amended soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abubaker J, Risberg K, Pell M (2012) Biogas residues as fertilisers—effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities. Appl Energy 99:126–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Ferrer-Costa A, Carrasco L, Cegarra J, Abad M, Bernal MP (2012) Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy 40:181–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alotaibi KD, Schoenau JJ (2011) Enzymatic activity and microbial biomass in soil amended with biofuel production byproducts. Appl Soil Ecol 48(2):227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann S, Gropp M, Eichler-Löbermann B (2014) Phosphorus availability and soil microbial activity in a 3 year field experiment amended with digested dairy slurry. Biomass Bioenergy 70:429–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian A, Ponnuraj K (2010) Crystal structure of the first plant urease from jack bean: 83 years of journey from its first crystal to molecular structure. J Mol Biol 400(3):274–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, Wardle DA (2010) Aboveground-belowground linkages: biotic interactions, ecosystem processes, and global change. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen QL, Gu J, Gao H, Qin QJ, Zhen LS, Chen SN, Sun LN (2009) Effect of matching use of straw and fertilizer on the dynamic changes of soil dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities. Agric Res 27(4):146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SL, Yu WW, ZHANG Z, Luo SR (2015) Soil properties and enzyme activities as affected by biogas slurry irrigation in the Three Gorges Reservoir areas of China. J Environ Biol 36(2):513–522

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente C, Alburquerque JA, Clemente R, Bernal MP (2013) Soil C and N mineralisation and agricultural value of the products of an anaerobic digestion system. Biol Fert Soils 49(3):313–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Neve S, Sleutel S, Hofman G (2003) Carbon mineralization from composts and food industry wastes added to soil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 67(1):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diacono M, Montemurro F (2010) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:401–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dilly O, Nannipieri P (2001) Response of ATP concent, respiration rate and enzyme activities in an arable and a forest soil to nutrient additions. Biol Fert Soils 34(1):64–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erisman JW, Sutton MA, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W (2008) How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nat Geosci 1(10):636–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fouda S, von Tucher S, Lichti F, Schmidhalter U (2013) Nitrogen availability of various biogas residues applied to ryegrass. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176(4):572–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Marmer E, Cai ZC, Abrol YP, Dadhwal VK, Vel Murugan A (2008) The environmental reach of Asia. Annu Rev Environ Resour 33:461–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvez A, Sinicco T, Cayuela ML, Mingorance MD, Fornasier F, Mondini C (2012) Short term effects of bioenergy by-products on soil C and N dynamics, nutrient availability and biochemical properties. Agric Ecosyst Environ 160:3–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 100(22):5478–5484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Peng XX, Huang QR, Zhang WJ (2010) Soil aggregation and organic carbon fractions affected by long-term fertilization in a red soil of subtropical China. Geoderma 154(3):364–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Insam H, Gómez-Brandón M, Ascher J (2015) Manure-based biogas fermentation residues–Friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol Biochem 84:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joergensen RG (1996) The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: calibration of the k EC value. Soil Biol Biochem 28(1):25–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le C, Klein D (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science 98(6):371–376

  • Li Y, Shan ZJ, Xu DH (2002) Preliminary of management of livestock pollution in China. Chin J Eco-Agric 10(2):136–138 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Sheng K, Peng S, Meng Z, Dong Z (2014) Effects of biogas slurry on wheat yield and the physical and chemical properties of soil. Chin Agric Sci Bull 30(12):181–186 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu RK (2000) Analytical methods for soil and agricultural chemistry. Chinese Agricultural Scientech Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller K, Müller T (2012) Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng Life Sci 12(3):242–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Möller K, Stinner W, Deuker A, Leithold G (2008) Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on nitrogen cycle and crop yield in mixed organic dairy farming systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 82(3):209–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties: 539-579

  • Nielsen JBH, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2007) The future of biogas in Europe: visions and targets until 2020. The Future of Biogas in Europe III:101

  • Nishikawa T, Li KZ, Inoue H, Umeda M, Hirooka H, Inamura T (2012) Effects of the long-term application of anaerobically-digested cattle manure on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.), and soil fertility in warmer region of Japan. Plant Prod Sci 15(4):284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odlare M, Arthurson V, Pell M, Svensson K, Nehrenheim E, Abubaker J (2011) Land application of organic waste–effects on the soil ecosystem. Appl Energy 88(6):2210–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Mateos M, Gonzalez-Carcedo S (1988) Assay of urease activity in soil columns. Soil Biol Biochem 20(4):567–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powlson DS, Prookes PC, Christensen BT (1987) Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem 19(2):159–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta HL (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311(5760):484–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ros M, Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez MT, Insam H (2006) Hydrolase activities, microbial biomass and bacterial community in a soil after long-term amendment with different composts. Soil Biol Biochem 38(12):3443–3452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder JJ, Jansen AG, Hilhorst GJ (2005) Long-term nitrogen supply from cattle slurry. Soil Use Manag 21(2):196–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieling K, Herrmann A, Wienforth B, Taube F, Ohl S, Hartung E, Kage H (2013) Biogas cropping systems: short term response of yield performance and N use efficiency to biogas residue application. Eur J Agron 47:44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer SG, Kjellerup V, Kristjansen O (1992) Determination of total ammonium nitrogen in pig and cattle slurry: sample preparation and analysis. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 42(3):146–151

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson K, Odlare M, Pell M (2004) The fertilizing effect of compost and biogas residues from source separated household waste. J Agric Sci 142(04):461–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tao HG, Li XB, Zhao TL (2003) Bioliquid & biosolid and eco-agriculture. Renew Energy 2:37–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhoeven-Urselmans T, Scheller E, Raubuch M, Ludwig B, Re J (2009) CO2 evolution and N mineralization after biogas slurry application in the field and its yield effects on spring barley. Appl Soil Ecol 42(3):297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari VN, Tiwari KN, Upadhyay RM (2000) Effect of crop residues and biogas slurry incorporation in wheat on yield and soil fertility. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 48(3):515–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Veldhoven PP, Mannaerts GP (1987) Inorganic and organic phosphate measurements in the nanomolar range. Anal Biochem 161(1):45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19(6):703–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe FS, Olsen SR (1965) Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 29(6):677–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JS, Joergensen RG, Pommerening B, Chaussod R, Brookes PC (1990) Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction—an automated procedure. Soil Biol Biochem 22(8):1167–1169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Horn R (2001) Mechanisms of aggregate stabilization in Ultisols from subtropical China. Geoderma 99(1):123–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Peng X (2006) Organic matter enrichment and aggregate stabilization in a severely degraded Ultisol after reforestation. Pedosphere 16(6):699–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Hong JP, Ren JX, Zhao ST (2007) Research on biogas slurry impact on the output and quality of oil seed rapes. J Shanxi Agric Sci 35(5):54–57 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Tong Y, Zhao H (2006) Effects of different N rates on nutrients accumulation, transformation and yield of summer maize. Plant Nutri Fertil Sci 12(5):622–627 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Peng X, Perfect E, Xiao T, Peng G (2013) Effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil aggregation in an Ultisol as characterized by synchrotron based X-ray micro-computed tomography. Geoderma 195:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo X (2008) Preliminary investigation on the biogas slurry used in rice production in cold region. Hei Long Jiang Agric Sci 2:61–62, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Haihong Zong for his help in the progress of samples analyzing and Xinhua Peng for his help in paper revision in Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. This work was financially supported by grants from the Commonweal Project of the Ministry of Agriculture of China (No.201203050), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31201690, 41401254, and 41401347), National Science and technology support plan (No. 2015BAD05B01 and 2014BAC04B02), and Jiangsu Municipal Natural Science Foundation (BK20140723 and BK20141050).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 210008, Nanjing, China

    Xuebo Zheng, Jianbo Fan, Jian Cui, Yi Wang, Jing Zhou & Mao Ye

  2. Soil Ecology Lab, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People’s Republic of China

    Mingming Sun

Authors
  1. Xuebo Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianbo Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jian Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jing Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mao Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mingming Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuebo Zheng or Jing Zhou.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hailong Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, X., Fan, J., Cui, J. et al. Effects of biogas slurry application on peanut yield, soil nutrients, carbon storage, and microbial activity in an Ultisol soil in southern China. J Soils Sediments 16, 449–460 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1254-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1254-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation