Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the necessity for thermal treatment in clay-based metal immobilization techniques as an environmentally acceptable sediment remediation process

  • SEDIMENTS, SEC 5 • SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this research was to apply the same immobilization (stabilization/solidification) clay-based treatments to sediment contaminated with different metals (Pb, Cd, Ni, Zn, Cu, Cr) with different distributions and availabilities in sediment. We also examined the possibility of using clay as an immobilization agent without the application of thermal treatment, in order to reduce the economic cost of this expensive remediation procedure.

Materials and methods

Clay from a canal in Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia, was used as the immobilization agent in a stabilization/solidification treatment to remediate metal-contaminated sediment. Semi-dynamic and toxicity characteristic leaching tests were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the nonthermal and thermal immobilization treatments with clay, and the long-term leaching behavior of these metals was determined using the following parameters: cumulative percentage of metals leached; diffusion coefficients; leachability indices; and toxicity characteristic leaching test concentration.

Results and discussion

Based on these parameters, both clay-based treatments were effective in immobilizing metals in the contaminated sediment. Results suggest that both heating temperature and clay proportion in the sediment–clay mixture impact the degree of metal immobilization.

Conclusions

Clay-based products are potentially good immobilization materials for metal-contaminated sediments, with the distribution of metals in the original sediment not influencing the efficacy of the treatments. Even without the thermal treatment, the metals were effectively immobilized. The leaching of metals was largely inside the regulatory limits and the treated samples can be regarded as nonhazardous materials. This justifies the choice of not applying the more expensive thermal treatment during remediation, especially when treating sediments containing a mixture of pollutants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANS (American National Standard) (1986) ANSI/ANS 16.1. American National Standard for the Measurement of the Leachibility of Solidified Low-Level Radioactive Wastes by Short-Term Tests Procedures. American National Standards Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniadis V, Tsadilas CD, Ashworth DJ (2007) Monometal and competitive adsorption of heavy metals by sewage sludge-amended soil. Chemosphere 68:489–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arain MB, Kazi TG, Jamali MK, Afridi HI, Jalbani N, Sarfraz RA (2008) Time saving modified BCR sequential extraction procedure for the fraction of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in sediment samples of polluted lake. J Hazard Mater 160:235–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (1993) Annual book of ASTM standards. Soil and rock; Building stones vol. 4.08. Philadelphia, PA, USA

  • Bhattacharyya KG, Gupta SS (2008) Adsorption of a few heavy metals on natural and modified kaolinite and montmorillonite: a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 140:114–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (1995) Protocol for the derivation of Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. CCME EPC-98E. Prepared by Environment Canada, Guideline Division, Technical Secretariat of the CCME Task Group on Water Quality Guidelines, Ottawa, Canada

  • Chiang KY, Chien KL, Hwang SW (2007) Study on the characteristics of building bricks produced from reservoir sediment. J Hazard Mater 159:499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covelo EF, Vega FA, Andrade ML (2007) Competitive sorption and desorption of heavy metals by individual soil components. J Hazard Mater 140:308–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciszewski D, Kubsik U, Kwaterezak UA (2012) Long-term dispersal of heavy metals in a catchment affected by historic lead and zinc mining. J Soils Sediments 12:1445–1462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dermatas D, Moon DH, Menounou XM, Hires R (2004) An evaluation of arsenic release from monolithic solids using a modified semi-dynamic leaching test. J Hazard Mater B116:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (1991) Proposed evaluation protocol for cement-based solidified wastes. Environmental Protection Series, Report No. EPS 3/HA/9, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada

  • Espinosa DCR, Tenorio JAS (2001) Thermal behavior of chromium electroplating sludge. Waste Manage 21:405–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fytianos K, Lourantou A (2004) Speciation of elements in sediment samples collected at lakes Volvi and Koronia, N. Greece. Environ Int 30:11–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskova O, Bukaty M (2008) Sorption of different cations onto clay minerals: modelling approach with ion exchange and surface complexation. Phys Chem Earth 33:1050–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guevara-Riba A, Sahuquillo A, Rubio R, Rauret G (2004) Assessment of metal mobility in dredged harbour sediments from Barcelona, Spain. Sci Total Environ 321:241–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SS, Bhattacharyya KG (2005) Interaction of metal ions with clays. I. A case study with Pb(II). Appl Clay Sci 30:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1995) ISO 11466: soil quality. Extraction of trace elements soluble in aqua regia, by International Organization for Standardization, 190/SC 3/WG 1, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Jain CK (2004) Metal fractionation study on bed sediments of River Yamuna, India. Water Res 38:569–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali MK, Kazi TG, Arain MB, Afridi HI, Jalbani N, Kandhro GA (2009) Speciation of heavy metals in untreated sewage sludge by using microwave assisted sequential extraction procedure. J Hazard Mater 163:1157–1164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang MQ, Jin XY, Lu XQ, Chen ZL (2010) Adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) onto natural kaolinite clay. Desalination 252:33–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelderman P, Drossaert WME (1999) Characterization of polluted sediments in the city canals of Delft, the Netherlands. Proceedings CATS 4 (Characterization and Treatment of Sediments), Antwerp, Belgium; pp 133–142

  • Lafhaj Z, Samara M, Agostini F, Boucard L, Skoczylas F, Depelsenaire G (2008) Polluted river sediments from the North region of France: treatment with Novosol process and valorization in clay bricks. Constr Build Mater 22:755–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louriño-Cabana B, Lesven L, Charriau A, Billon G, Ouddane B, Boughriet A (2011) Potential risks of metal toxicity in contaminated sediments of Deűle river in Northern France. J Hazard Mater 186:2129–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MHSPEDGEP (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment Directorate-General for Environmental Protection) (2000) Circular on target values and intervention values for soil remediation, Netherlands Government Gazette 39, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Moon DH, Dermatas D (2006) An evaluation of lead leachability from stabilized/solidified soils under mofied semi-dynamic leaching conditions. Engin Geol 85:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon DH, Dermatas D (2007) Arsenic and lead release from fly ash stabilized/solidified soils under modified semi-dynamic leaching conditions. J Hazard Mater 141:388–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) An evaluation of technologies for the heavy remediation of dredged sediments. J Hazard Mater 85:145–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nathwani JS, Phillips CR (1980) Leachability of Ra-226 from uranium mill tailings consolidated with naturally occurring materials and/or cement: analysis based on mass transport equation. Water Air Soil Pollut 14:389–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NEN (Netherlands Standardization Institute) (1990a) Determination of copper content by atomic absorption spectrometry (flame technique), Netherlands norm, NEN 5758, Netherlands Standardization Institute, Delft, the Netherlands

  • NEN (1990b) Determination of zinc content by atomic absorption spectrometry (flame technique), Netherlands norm, NEN 5759, Netherlands Standardization Institute, Delft, the Netherlands

  • NEN (1990c) Determination of lead content by atomic absorption 775 spectrometry (flame technique), Netherlands norm, NEN 5761, Netherlands Standardization Institute, Delft, the Netherlands

  • NEN (1990d) Determination of cadmium content by atomic absorption spectrometry (flame technique), Netherlands norm, NEN 5762, Netherlands Standardization Institute, Delft, the Netherlands

  • NEN (1991a) Determination of nickel content by atomic absorption spectrometry (flame technique), Netherlands norm, NEN 5765, Netherlands Standardization Institute, Delft, the Netherlands

  • NEN (1991b) Determination of chromium content by atomic absorption spectrometry (flame technique), Netherlands norm, NEN 5767, Netherlands Standardization Institute, Delft, the Netherlands

  • NEN (1994) Determination of organic matter content in soil as loss-on-ignition, Netherlands norm, NEN 5754, Netherlands Standardization Institute, Delft, the Netherlands

  • Rengaraj S, Yeon KH, Kang SY, Lee JU, Kim KW, Moon SH (2002) Studies on adsorptive removal of Co(II), Cr(III) and Ni(II) by IRN77 cation-exchange resin. J Hazard Mater B92:185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla A, Zhang YH, Dubey P, Margrave JL, Shukla SS (2002) The role of sawdust in the removal of unwanted materials from water. J Hazard Mater 95:137–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sipos P, Németh T, Kovács KV, Mohai I (2008) Sorption of copper, zinc and lead on soil mineral phases. Chemosphere 73:461–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh IB, Chaturvedi K, Morchhale RK, Yegneswaran AH (2007) Thermal treatment of toxic metals of industrial hazardous wastes with fly ash and clay. J Hazard Mater 141:215–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzen M, Melek E, Soylak M (2006) Celtek clay as sorbent for separation–preconcentration of metal ions from environmental samples. J Hazard Mater B 136:597–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2002) Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, Method 1311. Available at: www.EPA.gov/SW-846/1311.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2012

  • Wang KS, Sun CJ, Liu CY (2001) Effects of the type of sintering atmosphere on the chromium leachability of thermal-treated municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash. Waste Manage 21:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Zhang Y, Shukla A, Shukla SS, Dorris KL (2000) The removal of heavy metal from aqueous solutions by sawdust adsorption—removal of copper. J Hazard Mater B 80:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Pigna M, Cozzolino V, Caporale AG, Violante A (2010) Competitive sorption of copper(II), chromium(III) and lead(II) on ferrihydrite and two organomineral complexes. Geoderma 159:409–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (grant nos. III43005 and TR37004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dejan Krcmar.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Trudy J. Estes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krcmar, D., Dalmacija, M., Dalmacija, B. et al. Evaluating the necessity for thermal treatment in clay-based metal immobilization techniques as an environmentally acceptable sediment remediation process. J Soils Sediments 13, 1318–1326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0722-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0722-2

Keywords

Navigation