Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon and water footprints of Brazilian mango produced in the semiarid region

  • REGIONAL TOPICS FROM LATIN AMERICA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Awareness regarding carbon and water footprint has gained visibility, encouraging actions towards compliance with the main available standards by fruit producers. This study presents the carbon and water footprint of packed mango produced in Vale do São Francisco, the main irrigated valley in Brazil. It provides an approach to identify the critical processes and opportunities for improvements in the conventional crop system that may support producers in the task of developing future site-specific assessments.

Methods

This assessment followed ISO 14046 and ISO 14067 for water and carbon footprints, respectively, as well as specific requirements of product category rule (PCR) 013 for fruits and nuts and Publicly Available Specification (PAS) 2051-1 for horticulture products. Primary data was collected for nursery (seedling), land use change, crop production, and packaging, considering five exported mango varieties: Palmer, Keitt, Kent, Haden, and Tommy Atkins. The carbon footprint assessment was based on the impact category climate change, while water footprint encompassed the following categories: water scarcity, marine and freshwater eutrophication, human toxicity (carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic), and freshwater ecotoxicity. The footprint analysis was performed for 1 kg of packed mango.

Results and discussion

The three main processes responsible for both footprints were related to crop production: fertilizer and electricity production as well as mango cropping. Moving from Caatinga vegetation to mango orchards increased carbon storage but was not enough to offset the impact on climate change. For water footprint, it was observed that the total volume of applied irrigation water was already below technical requirements and cannot be reduced, the same occurring for nitrogen fertilization. Scenario analysis showed that the use of alternative electricity sources and the reuse of wastewater brought no major improvement in results. Furthermore, the choice of local or country level characterization factors for water scarcity changed results significantly. Discussions are made regarding (i) the relevance of mango footprints when compared to other irrigated fruits, (ii) possibilities for improving mango footprint performance, (iii) the need for updating product category rules for fruits, and (iv) the quality of provided inventories and results.

Conclusions

The comparison of mango footprints with previous studies of irrigated fruits showed that mango performance is similar or better than many irrigated fruits, cultivated all over the world. Moreover, footprints may be further reduced if mango orchards are established in previously deforested land or areas occupied with annual crops and if improvements are made in the irrigation and fertilization practices at each mango production stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera E, Guzmán G, Alonso A (2015) Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and organic cropping systems in Spain. II. Fruit tree orchards. Agron Sustain Dev 35:725–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amarante OAC, Zack MBJ, Sá AL (2001) Atlas do potencial eólico brasileiro (Atlas of the Brazilian wind energy potential). MME, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo PV, Silva BB, Silva VPR (2003) Water requirements of irrigated mango orchards in Northeast Brazil. Agricultural Water Management, Amsterdam 58(1):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basset-Mens C, Vannière H, Grasselly D, Heitz H, Braun A, Payen S, Koch P, Biard Y (2016) Environmental impacts of imported and locally grown fruits for the French market: a cradle-to-farm-gate LCA study. Fruits 71(2):93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengoa X, Rossi V, Humbert S, Nemecek T, Lansche J, Mouron P (2014) Methodological guidelines for the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. World Food LCA Database (WFLDB). Quantis and Agroscope, Lausanne and Zurich, Switzerland

  • Bessou C, Basset-Mens C, Tran T, Benoist A (2013) LCA applied to perennial cropping systems: a review focused on the farm stage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:340–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulay AM, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Lathuillière MJ, Manzardo A, Margni M, Motoshita M, Núñez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Oki T, Worbe S, Pfister S (2018) The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandão SS, Salviano AM, Olszevski N, Giongo V (2017) Green manure contributing for nutrients cycling in irrigated environments of the Brazilian semi-arid. J Environ Anal Prog 2(4):519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo G, López D, Vásquez M, Iriarte A (2017) Carbon footprint assessment of sweet cherry production: hotspots and improvement options. Pol J Environ Stud 26(2):559–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Yearbook of Fruticulture (Anuário Brasileiro da Fruticultura) (2014) Brazilian fruit yearbook. ABF, Santa Cruz do Sul

    Google Scholar 

  • British Standards Institution (BSI) (2012) PAS 2050-1: assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from horticultural products—supplementary requirements for the cradle to gate stages of GHG assessments of horticultural products undertaken in accordance with PAS 2050. BSI, London

  • Coelho EF, Coelho Filho MA, Cotrim CEC, Silva AJP (2014) Mecanismos para otimização da eficiência do uso da água em fruteiras tropicais [Mechanisms for optimization of water use efficiency in tropical fruits]. Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Cruz das Almas

  • Cordes H, Iriarte A, Villalobos P (2016) Evaluating the carbon footprint of Chilean organic blueberry production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:281–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha TJF, Giongo V (2015) Manejo do solo [Soil management]. In: Mouco MAC. Cultivo da mangueira [Mango cultivation]. Available from: <https://www.spo.cnptia.embrapa.br>. Accessed: 01 Nov 2017

  • Cunha TJ, Silva FH, Silva MS, Giongo V, Sá IB, Oliveira Neto MB, Cavalcanti AC (2008) Solos do Submédio do Vale do São Francisco: potencialidades e limitações para uso agrícola. Embrapa Semiárido-Documentos

  • Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (EPE) (2015). Brazilian energy balance 2015 year 2014. Rio de Janeiro: EPE Available from: <http://www.mme.gov.br>. Accessed: 25 Nov 2017

  • Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) (2012a) Product category rules: UN CPC 013 for fruits and nuts. Available from: <https://www.environdeccom/PCR/Detail/?Pcr=8235>. Accessed: 25 Nov 2017

  • Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) (2012b) EPD of Italian apple. Available from: <https://www.environdec.com/Detail/?Epd=8793>. Accessed: 13 June 2018

  • Faist Emmenegger M, Reinhard J, Zah, R (2009) Sustainability quick check for biofuels: background report, Dübendorf

  • Figueirêdo MCB, Inke de Boer JM, Kroeze C, Barros VS, Sousa JÁ, Aragão FAZ, Gondim RS, Potting J (2014) Reducing the impact of irrigated crops on freshwater availability: the case of Brazilian yellow melons. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueirêdo MCB, Kroeze C, Potting J, Barros VS, Aragão FAZ, Gondim RS, Santos TL, Imke de Boer JM (2013) The carbon footprint of exported Brazilian yellow melon. J Clean Prod 47:404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1997) Irrigation potential in Africa: a basin approach. Available from: <http://www.fao.org/docrep/W4347E/w4347e00htm#Contents>. Accessed: 15 Oct 2017

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (2007) Ecoinvent e overview and methodology. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia FRM, Ricalde MP (2013) Augmentative biological control using parasitoids for fruit fly management in Brazil. Insects 4(1):55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Schryver A, Oele M. (2008) Simapro 7: introduction to LCA. PRé Consultants

  • Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts MAJ, De Schryver A, Van Zelm R (2013) ReCiPe 2008: a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level (Version 1.08), report I: characterization. 126 p. PRé Consultants, University of Leiden, Radboud

  • Giudice AL, Mbohwa C, Clasadonte MT, Ingrao C (2013) Environmental assessment of the citrus fruit production in Sicily using LCA. Ital J Food Sci 25:202–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics] (2016) Municipal agricultural production—year 2015. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, IBGE

  • Ingwersen WW (2012) Life cycle assessment of fresh pineapple from Costa Rica. J Clean Prod 35:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006a) ISO 14040: environmental management–life cycle assessment–principles and framework. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006b) ISO 14044: environmental management–life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006c) ISO 14025: environmental labels and declarations–type III environmental declarations–principles and procedures. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2013) ISO 14067: greenhouse gases–carbon footprint of products–requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2014) ISO 14046: environmental management–water footprint–principles, requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change (2007): synthesis report: contributions of working group I, II and III to the fourth Assessment Report. Available from: <http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_sppdf>. Accessed: 20 Nov 2017

  • Knudsen MT, Almeida GF, Langer V, Abreu LS, Halberg N (2011) Environmental assessment of organic juice imported to Denmark: a case study on oranges (Citrus sinensis) from Brazil. Org Agr 1:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levasseur A, Schryver A, Hauschild M, Kabe Y, Sahnoune A, Tanaka K, Cherubini F (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts. In UNEP/SETAC, Global Guidance for life cycle impact assessment indicators: volume 1. Available from: <https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/training-resources/global-guidance-lcia-indicators-v-1/>. Accessed: 25 Nov 2017

  • Marras S, Masia S, Duce P, Spano D, Sirca C (2015) Carbon footprint assessment on a mature vineyard. Agric For Meteorol 214-215:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministério da Indústria, Comércio Exterior e Serviços (MDIC) [Ministry of Industry, Foreign Trade and Services] (2017) Aliceweb database. Available from: < http://aliceweb.mdic.gov.br/#this%3E. Accessed: 19 Oct 2017

  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI) [Ministry of Science Technology and Innovation] (2010) Inventário Brasileiro de Emissões Antrópicas por Fontes e Remoções por Sumidouros de Gases de Efeito Estufa não Controlados pelo Protocolo de Montreal. Brasília: MCTI

  • National Mango Board (NMB) (2010) Sustainability assessment: baseline assessment findings & recommendations. Available from: <http://www.mango.org/Mangos/media/Media/Documents/Research%20And%20Resources/Research/Industry/Post-Harvest/Sustainability_Final_Report_Engpdf?ext=pdf>. Accessed: 15 Oct 2017

  • Nemecek T, Schnetzer J (2011) Methods of assessment of direct field emissions for LCIs of agricultural production systems, Zurich

  • Nemecek T, Schnetzer J, Reinhard J (2016) Updated and harmonized greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1361–1378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicki G (2016) The environmental pressures of eating a mango: a preliminary life cycle assessment of mango production in Taiwan. A&WMA’s 109th Annual Conference & Exhibition. New Orleans, Louisiana

  • Novaes RML, Pazianotto RAA, Brandão M, Alves BJR, May A, Folegatti-Matsuura MIS (2017) Estimating 20-year land-use change and derived CO2 emissions associated with crops, pasture and forestry in Brazil and each of its 27 states. Glob Change Biol 23:3716–3728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novais RF, Smyth TJ (1999) Fósforo em solo e planta em condições tropicais. Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, MG (Brasil). Dept. de Solos

  • Oliveira AR et al (2010) Cultivo da Mangueira. Sistemas de Produção, 2 - 2a edição. ISSN 1807-0027. Available from: <https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/884451/1/CultivodaMangueira.pdf>. Accessed: 18 Oct 2017

  • Pereira EB, Martins FR, Gonçalves AR, Costa RS, Lima FJL, Ruther R, Abreu SL, Tiepolo GM, Pereira SV, Souza JG (2017) Atlas brasileiro de energia solar [Brazilian atlas of solar energy]. São José dos Campos: INPE

  • Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environmental science & technology 43(11):4098–4104

  • Ridoutt BG, Juliano P, Sanguansri P, Sellahewa J (2010) The water footprint of food waste: case study of fresh mango in Australia. J Clean Prod 18:1714–1721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roibás L, Elbehri A, Hospido A (2015) Evaluating the sustainability of Ecuadorian bananas: carbon footprint, water usage and wealth distribution along the supply chain. Sustain Prod Consump 2:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HR, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterization factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos TL, Nunes ABA, Giongo V, Barros VS, Figueirêdo MCB (2018) Cleaner fruit production with green manure: the case of Brazilian melons. J Clean Prod 181:260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva DJ, Pereira JR, Mouco MAC, Albuquerque JAS, Raij BV, Silva CA (2004) Nutrição Mineral e Adubação da Mangueira em Condições Irrigadas. Circular técnica 77 Petrolina: Embrapa Semiárido. Available from: <https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/154259>. Accessed: 01 Nov 2017

  • Simão AH, Mantovani EC, Simão FR (2004) Irrigação e fertirrigação na cultura da mangueira [Irrigation and fertirrigation in mango culture]. In: Rosane DE, Darezzo RJ, Aguiar RL, Aguilera GHA, Zambolim L. Viçosa: UFV

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Kahhat R, Santillán-Saldívar J, Quispe I, Bentín M (2017a) Carbon footprint of pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivation in a hyper-arid region in coastal Peru. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:601–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Torres-García JR, Cáceres AL, Larrea-Gallegos G, Quispe I, Kahhat R (2017b) Assessing the magnitude of potential environmental impacts related to water and toxicity in the Peruvian hyper-arid coast: a case study for the cultivation of grapes for Pisco production. Sci Total Environ 601-602:532–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vinyes E, Asin L, Alegre S, Muñoz P, Boschmonart J, Gasol CM (2017) Life cycle assessment of apple and peach production, distribution and consumption in mediterranean fruit sector. J Clean Prod 149:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Group (WRG) (2009) Charting our water future: economic frameworks to inform decision-making. Available from: <https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/charting-our-water-future>. Accessed: 25 Nov 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, 60020-181, Ceará, Brazil

    Jade Müller Carneiro

  2. Ceará State University, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60741-000, Brazil

    Amanda Ferreira Dias

  3. Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60511-110, Brazil

    Viviane da Silva Barros & Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo

  4. Embrapa Semiárido, Petrolina, Pernambuco, 56302-970, Brazil

    Vanderlise Giongo

  5. Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna, São Paulo, 13918-110, Brazil

    Marília Ieda da Silveira Folegatti Matsuura

Authors
  1. Jade Müller Carneiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda Ferreira Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Viviane da Silva Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vanderlise Giongo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marília Ieda da Silveira Folegatti Matsuura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Matthias Finkbeiner

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 74 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Müller Carneiro, J., Dias, A.F., Barros, V.d. et al. Carbon and water footprints of Brazilian mango produced in the semiarid region. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 735–752 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1527-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1527-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation