Skip to main content
Log in

New firm registration and the business cycle

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the relationship between entrepreneurship and economic growth using new panel data on the number of new firm registrations in 109 countries for the period 2002–2012. We find strong evidence of a pro-cyclical pattern in entrepreneurship. Furthermore we examine heterogeneous relationships between new firm registration and the business cycle and find that higher levels of financial development and a better business environment are associated with a stronger pro-cyclicality of entrepreneurship both across countries and within countries over time, i.e. a sharper contraction of new firm registrations at the outset of a recession, and a faster recovery of new firm registrations after the recession has ended. These findings suggest that fostering an efficient regulatory environment for the financial and private sector is important for encouraging a speedier recovery in the formation of new firms during economic expansions and aiding the efficient wind-down of insolvent firms during economic slowdowns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Evidence of a relationship between tighter credit during and economic downturns has been found in both high-income and developing countries. For example, Bernanke and Lown (1999) bring evidence of a decrease in bank lending, or a “credit crunch” in the banking sector, during the 1990 recession in the United States. Similarly, evidence has been found in Korea (Borensztein and Lee, 2002) and Eastern Europe (Guillermo and Coricelli, 1993).

  2. The complete database on new firm registration is available at: www.doingbusiness.org/entrepreneurship.

  3. Data collected from economies categorized by the International Monetary Fund and the Financial Stability Forum as offshore financial centers are excluded from the analysis. See http://www.imf.org/external/np/mae/oshore/2000/eng/back.htm#table 1 and http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2008/050808.pdf

  4. See Table 1 for the definition and sources for all variables.

  5. We lose several years of data since Doing Business data is not available for early part of our sample.

  6. These results are also robust to using either starting values of our financial development and business environment measures (using 2003 for financial development and 2004 for business environment), or averages taken over the pre-crisis years, i.e. 2003–2007 or 2004–2007.

References

  • Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anyadike-Danes, M., Hart, M., & Lenihan, H. (2010). New business formation in a rapidly growing economy: the Irish experience. Small Business Economics, 36, 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. (1995). Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Acs, Z. J. (1994). New firm start-ups technology and macroeconomics fluctuations. Small Business Economics, 6, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R., & Preto, M. T. (2007). The dynamics of causality between entrepreneurship and unemployment. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 7(3), 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., & Gertler, M. (1989). Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations. American Economic Review, 79(1), 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., & Lown, C. (1999). The Credit Crunch. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1991(2), 205–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borensztein, E., & Lee, J. W. (2002). Financial Crisis and Credit Crunch in Korea: Evidence from Firm-Level Data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 4(May), 853–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, R. (1999). Transitions to and from self-employment in Spain: an empirical analysis”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M., & Thurik, A. R. (2008). The lag structure of the impact of business ownership on economic performance in OECD countries. Small Business Economics, 30, 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, A., & Papaioannou, E. (2007). Red tape and delayed entry. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(2), 444–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congregado, E., Golpe, A., & Parker, S. (2012). The dynamics of entrepreneurship hysterisis, business cycles and government policy. Journal of Empirical Economics, 43(3), 1,239–1,261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Qian, Y., Roland, G., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2006a). Entrepreneurship in Brazil, China, and Russia. Working Paper No: Centre for Economic and Financial Research at New Economic School. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., & Leighton, L. (1990). Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Business Economics, 2, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. (2011). Entrepreneurship, economic conditions, and the great recession, Institute for the Study of Labor, Discussion paper # 5725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: the case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30, 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the city, NBER Working Paper # 13551.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D. (1996). The political economy of new business formation across the American states 1970–1985. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haltiwanger, J. C., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2010). Who creates jobs? NBER, Working Paper: Small vs. Large Vs. Young. 16300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship.Journal of. Financial Economics, 82(3), 591–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., & Love, I. (2011a). Policy Research Working Paper 5493. World: Bank, Washington, DC. “The Impact of Business Environment Reforms on New Firm Registration”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., & Love, I. (2011b). The Impact of the Financial Crisis on New Firm Registration. Economics Letters, 113(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellinger, P., & Thurik, R. (2012). Entrepreneurship and the Business Cycle. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1143–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, L., & Acs, Z. (2005). Penetrating the knowledge filter in regional economies. The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3), 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampini, A. (2004). Entrepreneur activity, risk and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 5, 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, 88, 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1912). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurik, A., Carree, M., van Stel, A., & Audretsch, D. (2008). Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A., & Storey, D. (2004). The link between firm births and employment: is there an upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38(8), 893–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). World Development Indicators, 2010. The World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). Doing Business 2011: Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs. DC: Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zoromé, A. (2007). Concept of offshore financial centers. In search of an operational definition.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and the World Bank Group for financial support. This paper's findings, interpretations, and conclusions are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank, their Executive Directors, or the countries they represent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leora Klapper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klapper, L., Love, I. & Randall, D. New firm registration and the business cycle. Int Entrep Manag J 11, 287–306 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0345-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0345-0

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation