Abstract
The Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) is an effective solution for landfill leachate treatment using an anaerobic fermentation process, which helps to reduce operating costs and sludge volume. To better understand the biological, chemical, and physical processes involved, especially when combining the ABR with an aerobic component, the study aimed to investigate the performance of an Anaerobic–Aerobic Hybrid Baffled Reactor (AABR) that includes an Anaerobic Filter (AF) for treating landfill leachate. This research utilized two glass reactors. The first reactor, designated as AABR-AF, consisted of six independent rectangular glass chambers arranged side by side. The third and sixth chamber designed for aerobic treatment and AF, respectively. The second reactor was used as a control reactor and did not include any aerobic chamber. The highest Removal Efficiencies (REs) for turbidity, COD, BOD, TP, TKN, nitrate, TOC, and TSS in the AABR-AF and ABR-AF were found to be (65.4% and 56.3%), (98.3% and 94.1%), (98.1% and 93.2%), (86.4% and 65%), (89.2% and 76.7%), (81.2% and 64.4%), (88.2% and 79.4%), and (72.4% and 68.5%), respectively. These optimal REs were achieved at an HRT of 48 h and an OLR of 10 kg/m3.d. Also, the highest and the lowest REs in Heavy Metals (HMs) were 89.57% for manganese in AABR-AF and 6.59% for nickel in ABR-AF, in an OLR of 10 kg/m3.d, respectively. The effective removal of Organic Matters (OMs) from landfill leachate using the AABR-AF and ABR-AF was found to be strongly influenced by HRT and OLR. The AABR-AF configuration, featuring a single aerobic chamber in the reactor, exhibited a higher efficiency in removing OMs compared to the ABR-AF configuration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Abudi ZN, Hu Z, Sun N et al (2016) Batch anaerobic co-digestion of OFMSW (organic fraction of municipal solid waste), TWAS (thickened waste activated sludge) and RS (rice straw): influence of TWAS and RS pretreatment and mixing ratio. Energy 107:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.141
Ahmad I, Chelliapan S, Othman N, Abdullah N, Arumugam N (2020) Start-up of Modified Anaerobic Baffled Reactor for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Using Granular Sludge. J Environ Treat Tech 8(3):988–992
Ahmada I, Chelliapana S, Othmana N, Nasrib NS, Krishnanc S (2019) Treatment of landfill leachate using modified anaerobic baffled reactor. Desalin Water Treat 183:268–275. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25242
Arhoun B, Villen-Guzman M, El Mail R, Gomez-Lahoz C (2021) Anaerobic codigestion with fruit and vegetable wastes: an opportunity to enhance the sustainability and circular economy of the WWTP digesters. Clean Energy and Resources Recovery: Elsevier. 103–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85223-4.00015-4
Aris MAM, Chelliapan S, Din M et al (2017) Effect of organic loading rate (OLR) on the performance of modified anaerobic baffled reactor (MABR) supported by slanted baffles. Desalin Water Treat 79:56–63. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20838
Arvin A, Hosseini M, Amin MM, Darzi GN, Ghasemi Y (2019) A comparative study of the anaerobic baffled reactor and an integrated anaerobic baffled reactor and microbial electrolysis cell for treatment of petrochemical wastewater. Biochem Eng J 144:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.01.021
Arvin A, Peyravi M, Jahanshahi M, Salmani H (2016) Hydrodynamic evaluation of an anaerobic baffled reactor for landfill leachate treatment. Desalin Water Treat 57(42):19596–19608. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1106347
Aziz A, Basheer F, Sengar A, Khan SU, Farooqi IH (2019) Biological wastewater treatment (anaerobic-aerobic) technologies for safe discharge of treated slaughterhouse and meat processing wastewater. Sci Total Environ 686:681–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.295
Baird BR, Eaton DA, Rice WE (2017) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edn. APHA, Washington, USA
Barber WP, Stuckey DC (2000) Nitrogen Removal in a Modified Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR): 1, Denitrification. Wat Res 34(9):2413–2422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00425-X
Barnard JL (1976) A review of biological phosphorus removal in the activated sludge process. Water Sa 2(3):136–144
Bhattacharya J, Dev S, Das B (2018) Design of Wastewater Bioremediation Plant and Systems. Low-Cost Wastewater Bioremediation Technology:265–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812510-6.00011-5
Bolognesi S, Cecconet D, Callegari A, Capodaglio AG (2020) Bioelectrochemical treatment of municipal solid waste landfill mature leachate and dairy wastewater as co-substrates. Environ Sci Pollut R:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10167-7
Boopathy R, Tilche A (1991) Anaerobic digestion of high strength molasses wastewater using hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Res 25(7):785–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(91)90157-l
Bustillo-Lecompte CF, Mehrvar M, Quiñones-Bolaños E (2013) Combined anaerobic-aerobic and UV/H2O2 processes for the treatment of synthetic slaughterhouse wastewater. J Environ Sci Heal A 48(9):1122–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2013.774662
Castillo-Suárez LA, Lugo-Lugo V, Linares-Hernández I, Martínez-Miranda V, Esparza-Soto M, de los Ángeles Mier-Quiroga M, (2019) Biodegradability index enhancement of landfill leachates using a Solar Galvanic-Fenton and Galvanic-Fenton system coupled to an anaerobic–aerobic bioreactor. Sol Energy 188:989–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.010
Cheah Y-K, Vidal-Antich C, Dosta J, Mata-Álvarez J (2019) Volatile fatty acid production from mesophilic acidogenic fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and food waste under acidic and alkaline pH. Environ Sci Pollut R 26(35):35509–35522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05394-6
Colombo A, Módenes AN, Trigueros DEG, da Costa SIG, Borba FH, Espinoza-Quiñones FR (2019) Treatment of sanitary landfill leachate by the combination of photo-Fenton and biological processes. J Clean Prod 214:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.310
David B, Federico B, Cristina C, Marco G, Federico M, Paolo P (2019) Biohythane production from food wastes. Biohydrogen: Elsevier. 347–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64203-5.00013-7
De La Rubia M, Raposo F, Rincón B, Borja R (2009) Evaluation of the hydrolytic–acidogenic step of a two-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion process of sunflower oil cake. Bioresource Technol 100(18):4133–4138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.001
Diez V, Iglesias A, Cámara J, Ruiz M, Ramos C (2018) A novel anaerobic filter membrane bioreactor: prototype start-up and filtration assays. Water Sci Technol 78(9):1833–1842. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.018.309
do Amaral AC, Kunz A, Steinmetz RLR, Justi KC (2014) Zinc and copper distribution in swine wastewater treated by anaerobic digestion. J Environ Manage 141:132-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.021
Essien JP, Ikpe DI, Inam ED, Okon AO, Ebong GA, Benson NU (2022) Occurrence and spatial distribution of heavy metals in landfill leachates and impacted freshwater ecosystem: An environmental and human health threat. PLoS ONE 17(2):e0263279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone
Faisal M, Unno H (2001) Kinetic analysis of palm oil mill wastewater treatment by a modified anaerobic baffled reactor. Biochem Eng J 9(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S369-703X(01)00122-X
Ghimire N, Wang S (2018) Biological treatment of petrochemical wastewater. Petroleum Chemicals-Recent Insight. 5: IntechOpen. pp 55–74. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79655
Gomes AI, Santos SG, Silva TF, Boaventura RA, Vilar VJ (2019) Treatment train for mature landfill leachates: Optimization studies. Sci Total Environ 673:470–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.027
Hahn MJ, Figueroa LA (2015) Pilot scale application of anaerobic baffled reactor for biologically enhanced primary treatment of raw municipal wastewater. Water Res 87:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.027
Ji G, Sun T, Ni J, Tong J (2009) Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for treating heavy oil produced water with high concentrations of salt and poor nutrient. Bioresource Technol 100(3):1108–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.015
Kaetzl K, Lübken M, Gehring T, Wichern M (2018) Efficient low-cost anaerobic treatment of wastewater using biochar and woodchip filters. Water 10(7):818. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070818
Kotcharoen W, Watari T, Adlin N et al (2023) Evaluation of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR)–downflow hanging sponge (DHS) system in treatment of black wastewater from a closed recirculating aquaculture system. Aquacult Eng 100:102303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2022
León-Becerril E, García-Camacho JE, Del Real-Olvera J, López-López A (2016) Performance of an upflow anaerobic filter in the treatment of cold meat industry wastewater. Process Saf Environ 102:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.04.016
Li J, Tabassum S (2022) Synergism of hydrolytic acidification and sulfate reducing bacteria for acid production and desulfurization in the anaerobic baffled reactor: High sulfate sewage wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 444:136611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022
Liu L, Wang J, Gao J, Wang Q, Lao T (2023) Research on Rural Wastewater Treatment Technology in Northwest China Based on Anaerobic Biofilm Coupled with Anaerobic Baffle Plate Reactor (ABR) Technology. Sustainability 15(11):8957. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118957
Liu T, Chen X, Wang X, Zheng S, Yang L (2018) Highly effective wastewater phosphorus removal by phosphorus accumulating organism combined with magnetic sorbent MFC@ La (OH) 3. Chem Eng J 335:443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.117
Luo J, Qian G, Liu J, Xu ZP (2015) Anaerobic methanogenesis of fresh leachate from municipal solid waste: A brief review on current progress. Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.053
Luo N, Gao Y-m, Liu X-j, Xie T, Guo X (2017) Effect of hydraulic retention time on MFC-A2/O process for domestic wastewater treatment. In: 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Energy Engineering. https://doi.org/10.12783/dteees/icesee2017/7862
Mahdavianpour M, Moussavi G, Farrokhi M (2018) Biodegradation and COD removal of p-Cresol in a denitrification baffled reactor: Performance evaluation and microbial community. Process Biochem 69:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.03.016
Manariotis ID, Grigoropoulos SG (2002) Low-strength wastewater treatment using an anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Environ Res 74(2):170–176. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143002X139884
Meng Y, Jost C, Mumme J, Wang K, Linke B (2016) Oxygen tolerance capacity of upflow anaerobic solid-state (UASS) with anaerobic filter (AF) system. J Environ Sci 45:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.01.009
Montero AAG, Serrano EVP, Montiel JP (2019) Sanitary landfill leachate treatment with double chamber anaerobic reactor in series with constructed wetland. Environ Process 6(3):695–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00380-z
Nachaiyasit S, Stuckey DC (1997) The effect of shock loads on the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). 1. Step changes in feed concentration at constant retention time. Water Res 31(11):2737–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00133-4
Nancharaiah YV, Sarvajith M (2019) Aerobic granular sludge process: a fast growing biological treatment for sustainable wastewater treatment. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 12:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.09.011
Öman CB, Junestedt C (2008) Chemical characterization of landfill leachates–400 parameters and compounds. Waste Manage 28(10):1876–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.018
Putra AA, Watari T, Maki S, Hatamoto M, Yamaguchi T (2020) Anaerobic baffled reactor to treat fishmeal wastewater with high organic content. Environ Technol Innov 17:100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019
Rajakumar R, Meenambal T, Banu JR, Yeom I (2011) Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in upflow anaerobic filter under low upflow velocity. IJEST 8(1):149–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326204
Saleem M, Spagni A, Alibardi L, Bertucco A, Lavagnolo MC (2018) Assessment of dynamic membrane filtration for biological treatment of old landfill leachate. J Environ Manage 213:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.057
Sanguanpak S, Chiemchaisri C, Chiemchaisri W, Yamamoto K (2015) Influence of operating pH on biodegradation performance and fouling propensity in membrane bioreactors for landfill leachate treatment. Int Biodeter Biodegr 102:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.024
Sarathai Y, Koottatep T, Morel A (2010) Hydraulic characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor as onsite wastewater treatment system. J Environ Sci 22(9):1319–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60257-6
Stanbury PF, Whitaker A, Hall SJ (2016) Principles of fermentation technology, 3rd edn, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-00186-7
Stuckey DC (2010) Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment. Environmental Anaerobic Technology: Applications and New Developments 163–84. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848165434_0008
Sung H-N, Katsou E, Statiris E, Anguilano L, Malamis S (2019) Operation of a modified anaerobic baffled reactor coupled with a membrane bioreactor for the treatment of municipal wastewater in Taiwan. Environ Technol 40(10):1233–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1420102
Thanwised P, Wirojanagud W, Reungsang A (2012) Effect of hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production and chemical oxygen demand removal from tapioca wastewater using anaerobic mixed cultures in anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Int J Hydrogen Energ 37(20):15503–15510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.068
Uddin MM, Wright MM (2023) Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances. Phys Sci Rev 8(9):2819–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0068
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) (1971) Method 352.1: Nitrogen, Nitrate (Colori-metric, Brucine) by Spectrophotometer. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/method_352-1_1971.pdf. Accessed 26 February 2024
Vongdala N, Tran H-D, Xuan TD, Teschke R, Khanh TD (2019) Heavy metal accumulation in water, soil, and plants of municipal solid waste landfill in Vientiane, Laos. Int J Env Res Pub He 16(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010022
Wang J, Huang Y, Zhao X (2004) Performance and characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor. Bioresource Technol 93(2):205–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.06.004
Wang Q, Yang L, Feng K, Li H, Deng Z, Liu J (2021) Promote lactic acid production from food waste fermentation using biogas slurry recirculation. Bioresource Technol 337:125393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021
Yang B, Xu H, Wang J, Yan D, Zhong Q, Yu H (2018) Performance evaluation of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for treating alkali-decrement wastewater of polyester fabrics at incremental organic loading rates. Water Sci Technol 77(10):2445–53. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.194
Yousefi Z, Behbodi M, Mohammadpour RA (2018) Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by combined anaerobic baffled reactor and anaerobic filter: study of OLR and HRT optimization in ABR/AF reactors. Environ Health Eng Manag 5(3):137–42. https://doi.org/10.15171/EHEM.2018.19
Yousefi Z, YazdaniCherati J, Movahedi M, Kariminejad F (2015) Effect of organic loading rate on the performance of anaerobic process in treatment of pulp and paper mill effluents. J Mazand Univ Med Sci 25(131):136–150
Yousefi Z, Zazouli MA, MohamadpurTahamtan RA, GhorbanianAleh Abad M (2012) The Effect of Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Modified by Anaerobic Filter (ABR-AF) on Solid Waste Leachate Treatment. J Mazand Univ Med Sci 21(86):27–36
Yu J-J, Chen H, Guo Q, Zhang Z-Z, Guo L-X, Jin R-C (2015) Response of performance of an anammox anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) to changes in feeding regime. Ecol Eng 83:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.004
Yulistyorini A, Purwaningsih RI, Mujiyono (2021) Post-treatment of anaerobic baffled reactor effluent using modified up-flow anaerobic filter. AIP Conf Proc 2447(1):030031. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0072820
Zhang M, Shi E (2021) The spatial community succession of an anaerobic baffled reactor with the variation of hydraulic retention time. Environ Technol Innov 22:101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021
Acknowledgements
This article is a research project and thesis of Mrs. Fatemeh Mortezazadeh, approved by the Vice Chancellor of Research and Technology of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (Approval code: 10212).
Funding
The authors thank to the Deputy of Research and Technology of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences for their financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Zabihollah Yousefi, Esmaeil Babanezhad, Yalda Hashempour, Reza Ali Mohammadpour, and Fatemeh Mortezazadeh]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Fatemeh Mortezazadeh] and subsequent versions were reviewed, revised and approved by all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Number IR.MAZUMS.REC.1400.10212.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent to Publish
All authors listed agreed to publish this work.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yousefi, Z., Babanezhad, E., Hashempour, Y. et al. Performance evaluation of Anaerobic–Aerobic Hybrid Baffled Reactor Coupled with an Anaerobic Filter treating Landfill Leachate. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 28062–28076 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32954-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32954-2