Abstract
In the context of global climate change, countries around the world are actively implementing carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals. In-depth research on carbon peak can help improve environmental conditions and achieve a harmonious coexistence between economic development and environmental protection. However, a comprehensive review of the current status of research in this area is scarce. Therefore, this article explores the current research evolution and hotspots of “carbon peak” with the help of CiteSpace visualization software, predicts the future development trends, and builds a knowledge network framework. A comprehensive analysis of the research on carbon peak from multiple perspectives is presented. The results show that the number of papers published on carbon peak is increasing every year, and that carbon peak has become a widely participated research area. Publications from various institutions and journals have also attracted widespread attention. The research hotspots of carbon peak have constantly changed with time, resulting in many theoretical and technological innovations. The knowledge framework of the field is constructed on this basis, which gives readers a clearer understanding of the development and trends in the field and provides some reference and help for future researchers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Supplementary data to this article will be provided on request.
References
Ahmad M, Ur Rahman Z, Hong L et al (2018) Impact of environmental quality variables and socio-economic factors on human health: empirical evidence from China [J]. Pollution 4(4):571–579
Chavaillaz Y, Roy P, Partanen AI et al (2019) Exposure to excessive heat and impacts on labour productivity linked to cumulative CO2 emissions [J]. Sci Rep 9:13711
Che SP, Kamphuis P, Zhang S et al (2022) A visualization analysis of crisis and risk communication research using CiteSpace [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(5):2923
Demirhan H (2020) Impact of increasing temperature anomalies and carbon dioxide emissions on wheat production [J]. Sci Total Environ 741:139616
Emmer A (2019) The careers behind and the impact of solo author articles in nature and science [J]. Scientometrics 120(2):825–840
Fang K, Tang Y, Zhang Q et al (2019) Will China peak its energy-related carbon emissions by 2030? Lessons from 30 Chinese provinces [J]. Appl Energy 255:113852
Hao K, Jia X, Dai W et al (2022) Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots of triple negative breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis[J]. Front Oncol 11:5375
Higham J, Hall C (2005) Making tourism sustainable: the real challenge of climate change? Tour Recreat Clim Chang 21:301–307
Hu W, Li C, Ye C et al (2019) Research progress on ecological models in the field of water eutrophication: CiteSpace analysis based on data from the ISI web of science database [J]. Ecol Model 410:108779
Hu S, Zhang P, Wei T (2022) Financial measures to reduce carbon emissions in Britain, Japan and the United States: a SWOT analysis [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(17):10771
Jin ZL, Qian L, Lv GX (2010) Carbon dioxide chemistry-status and prospects [J]. Adv Chem 22(06):1102
Li SJ, Du WH (2008) Order batch picking model and heuristic algorithm based on cluster analysis [J]. Stat Decis Making 12:53–56
Li F, Xu Z, Ma H (2018) Can China achieve its CO2 emissions peak by 2030? [J]. Ecol Ind 84:337–344
Lin BQ, Jiang ZJ (2009) Environmental Kuznets curve prediction of carbon dioxide in China and analysis of influencing factors [J]. Manag World 187(04):27–36
Liu D, Xiao B (2018) Can China achieve its carbon emission peaking? A scenario analysis based on STIRPAT and system dynamics model [J]. Ecol Ind 93:647–657
Mi Z, Wei YM, Wang B et al (2017) Socioeconomic impact assessment of China’s CO2 emissions peak prior to 2030 [J]. J Clean Prod 142:2227–2236
Mu H, Li H, Zhang M et al (2013) Analysis of China’s carbon dioxide flow for 2008 [J]. Energy Policy 54:320–326
Qureshi MA, Ahsan T, Gull AA (2022) Does country-level eco-innovation help reduce corporate CO2 emissions? Evidence from Europe [J]. J Clean Prod 379(1):134732
Rice MB, Thurston GD, Balmes JR et al (2014) Climate change. a global threat to cardiopulmonary health[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189(5):512–519
Shi H, Chai J, Lu Q et al (2022) The impact of China’s low-carbon transition on economy, society and energy in 2030 based on CO2 emissions drivers [J]. Energy 239:122336
U.N. (2020) General Assembly official records, 75th session: 4th plenary meeting, Tuesday, 22 September 2020, New York[R/OL]
Wang LL, Wang AJ, Wang GH (2009) Analysis of global energy consumption carbon emissions [J]. Resour Ind 4:6–15
Wang J, Wang S, Deng Z (2012) Some issues in cluster analysis research [J]. Control Decis Making 27(3):321–328
Xu SW, Han CY, Zhang LY et al (2011) Research progress of carbon dioxide capture and separation [J]. Nat Gas Chem: C1 Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 36(4):72–78
Yue LH, Chen BZ, Wang L (2001) Current status of research on the environmental impact of greenhouse gases and control technologies [J]. Environ Prot 12:13–14+27
Zhang KM (2008) China in a low carbon world: status, challenges and strategies [J]. China Popul Resour Environ 03:1–7
Zhang J, Wang Q, Xia Y et al (2022) Knowledge map of spatial planning and sustainable development: a visual analysis using CiteSpace [J]. Land 11(3):331
Funding
This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (21CJL007); the Humanities and Social Science Project of China’s Ministry of Education (20YJC790036); National Innovative Training Program for College Students (202311846004); Philosophy and Social Science Development Planning Project of Guangzhou (2021GZGJ07); Center for Translation Studies Project, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CTS202201).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: QG; methodology: QG; software and formal analysis: PY; writing—original draft preparation: QG and PY; writing—review and editing: QG and PY; supervision and funding acquisition: QG. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Q., Yao, P. Bibliometric review of carbon peak with CiteSpace: evolution, trends, and framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 13592–13608 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32008-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32008-7