Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating impacts of paper and electronic billing and invoicing business systems from an environmental and energy perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental and energy impacts of ICT were identified using a comparative life cycle assessment (CompLCA) focused on business invoicing processes comparing online to paper processes. There were net energy benefits from online billing. The potential impact across the economy and society is large, particularly as COVID-19 has forced many businesses and government services to shift to online service provision. For one million bills produced electronically and received by customers instead of a paper bill, 18.9 t CO2e is avoided, which translates to a national saving of 22,680 tCO2e, assuming 1.2 billion annual invoicing transactions. The impacts of CO2 are sensitive, however, to several assumptions. The study's originality was to show the range of invoicing variables that impact energy and the environment and to highlight which ones can be influenced. For example, the number of online bills produced was the most sensitive. However, the results are reversed under commonly occurring customer use situations. The study demonstrates the positive and negative impacts from the digitalisation of businesses. It suggests remedies based on the main drivers identified under company, contractor and customer control that led to energy consumption and environmental and land use impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No additional data sets are provided (other than in Supplementary Information).

References

  • Albers TM (2016) U.S. Adoption of electronic invoicing: challenges and opportunities. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Amankwaa G, Asaaga FA, Fischer C, Awotwe P (2020) Diffusion of electronic water payment innovations in urban Ghana. Evidence from Tema Metropolis. Water 12:1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Cleveland G, Schroeder RG (1989) Operations strategy: a literature review. J Oper Manag 8:133–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anumba CJ, Ruikar K (2002) Electronic commerce in construction—trends and prospects. Autom Constr 11:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arushanyan Y, Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2014) Lessons learned – review of LCAs for ICT products and services. Comput Ind 65:211–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir L, Elmeligi A (2018) Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: trends to 2040 & recommendations. J Clean Prod 177:448–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieser J, Salieri B, Hischier R, Hilty L (2020) Next generation mobile networks: problem or opportunity for climate protection? Swisscom AG, Swisscleantech, and University of Zurich, Empa Zurich, St. Gallen

    Google Scholar 

  • Brühl J, Smith G, Visser M (2019) Simple is good: Redesigning utility bills to reduce complexity and increase understanding. Util Policy 60:100934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carre A, Crossin E, Clune S (2015) LCA of Kerbside recycling in Victoria. Sustain Victoria, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Coroamă VC, Pargman D (2020) Skill rebound, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquer J, Vaeza-Gastélum C, Remmen A, Alvarez-Chávez CR, Velázquez LE (2015) Life cycle assessment for printed newspapers in Northwestern Mexico. Int J Sust Dev World 22:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gard DL, Keoleian GA (2008) Digital versus print: energy performance in the selection and use of scholarly journals. J Ind Ecol 6:115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinin L, Grinin A, Korotayev A (2022) COVID-19 pandemic as a trigger for the acceleration of the cybernetic revolution, transition from e-government to e-state, and change in social relations. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 175:121348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin TF (2021) Policies to minimise environmental and rebound effects from telework: a study for Australia. Environ Innov Soc Trans 39:18–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hischier R, Reichart I (2003) Multifunctional electronic media-traditional media. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itten R, Hischier R, Andrae A, Bieser J, Cabernard L, Falke A, Ferreboeuf H, Hilty L, Keller R, Lees-Perasso E, Preist C, Stuck M (2020) Digital transformation—life cycle assessment of digital services, multifunctional devices and cloud computing. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:2093–2098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karapetyan A, Yaqub W, Kirakosyan A, Sgouridis S (2015) A two-stage comparative life cycle assessment of paper-based and software-based business cards. Prog Comput Sci 52:819–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Rohmer S (2012) Electronic billing vs paper billing: dematerialization, energy consumption and environmental impacts. In: Electronics Goes Green 2012+, ECG 2012 - Joint International Conference and Exhibition, Proceedings. IEEEE, Berlin, Germany, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S (2002) Firm characteristics influencing the extent of electronic billing adoption: an empirical study in the US telecommunication industry. Telematics Inform 19:201–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koomey J, Masanet E (2021) Does not compute: Avoiding pitfalls assessing the Internet's energy and carbon impacts. Joule 5:1625–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel JM, Shoukourian H, Heidari MR, Wilde T (2019) Interference of billing and scheduling strategies for energy and cost savings in modern data centers. Sustain Comput: Inform Syst 23:49–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange S, Pohl J, Santarius T (2020) Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? Ecol Econ 176:106760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange S, Santarius T (2020) Smart Green World? Routledge, London, p 198

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent A, Weidema BP, Bare J, Liao X, Maia De Souza D, Pizzol M, Sala S, Schreiber H, Thonemann N, Verones F (2020) Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase. J Ind Ecol 24:986–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeish J (2015) Consumer trust and distrust: retaining paper bills in online banking. Int J Bank Mark 33:5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK, Demski C, Noel L (2021) Beyond climate, culture and comfort in European preferences for low-carbon heat. Glob Environ Chang 66:102200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strusani D, Houngbonon GV (2020) The impact of COVID-19 on disruptive technology adoption in emerging markets, International Finance Corporation (IFC). World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turits M (2020) Why working from home might be less sustainable. @BBC_Worklife, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk V, Kuhndt M, Alakeson V, Aldrich T, Geibler JV (2003)  The environmental and social impacts of ebanking. A case study with Barclays PLC. Final Report, Case study within the Digital Europe Project, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzberg J, Dandres T, Merveille N, Cheriet M, Samson R (2020) Should we fear the rebound effect in smart homes? Renew Sust Energ Rev 125:109798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T (2022) E-invoicing will reduce emissions, says PwC. Accountants Daily, Momentum Media, North Sydney

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Gabrielle McCorkell, Peter Doyle and Christoph Brulliard for coordinating the modelling and drafting the outputs; Tim Grant (Lifecycles) for support with the modelling; and my former colleague Christine Dawes for data collection and verification of its quality and accuracy. Sven Lundie (UNSW) reviewed the modelling and approach taken.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author undertook the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by the author.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Turlough F. Guerin.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

No ethical issue is to be declared in this article.

Consent to participate

No consent of participation is to be claimed.

Consent for publication

The author has read and approved the paper for publication. We confirmed that it has not been published previously nor is it being considered by any other peer-reviewed journal.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerin, .F. Evaluating impacts of paper and electronic billing and invoicing business systems from an environmental and energy perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 88095–88110 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28689-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28689-1

Keywords

Navigation