Abstract
In recent years, there has been a focus on clean power generation, and it is critical to assess the environmental impact of novel technologies used in pollution control in power generation. The study uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the environmental impacts of coal-fired thermal power plants with different emission control techniques in an Indian scenario. As there are no such studies available in the Indian context, this work might provide a holistic view of the impacts of energy generation. A supercritical coal-fired plant with a capacity of 660 MW is considered in this study. The system boundary included coal extraction, transportation, power plant operation, and transmission losses of electricity with a functional unit of 1 kWh. It was observed that there was an energy penalty due to the power consumed in emission control devices, but the maximum energy penalty was due to the power used in the carbon capture system. The LCA is done from “cradle to gate”, with impact indicators at the mid-point evaluated using the RECIPE (H) 2016 LCIA method. LCA results showed that power plant operation is the most significant contributor to environmental impact. Initially, in cases 1 and 2, climate change (CC) potential was a major impact category, but CC potential was reduced with carbon capture and storage, 0.27 kg CO2 eq. in case 3 with ESP, FGD, SCR, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) and 0.263 kg CO2 eq. in case 4 with ESP and CCS. But there was a considerable increase in the majority of the impact categories in case 4. Freshwater consumption potential increased from 3.98 E−03 m3 in base case 1 to 4.98 E−03 m3 in case 3 due to the amount of water used in chemical production during CCS, as CC potential is a major concern in power generation, However, compared to case 1, the potential for climate change increased in case 2, whilst in case 4, the potential for climate change is lower but has resulted in an increase in the majority of impact categories. Case 3 shows an optimal approach to reducing CO2 emissions compared to other cases. The combination of ESP, FGD, SCR, and CCS is favourable for cleaner energy generation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Online literature has been compiled with data about Indian thermal power.
References
Agrawal KK, Jain S, Jain AK, Dahiya S (2013) Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from coal and natural gas thermal power plants using life cycle approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2014(11):1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0420-z
Agrawal KK, Jain S, Jain AK, Dahiya S (2014) A life cycle environmental impact assessment of natural gas combined cycle thermal powerplant in Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Dev 11:162–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2014.04.002
Annisa R, Faridah L, Yuliawan D, Sinisuka N, Dinata I (2018) Environmental impact assessment of steam cycle and combine cycle power plants using life cycle assessment methodology. In: The 4th IEEE Conference on Power Engineering and Renewable Energy. IEEE
Asante-Okyere S, Daqing T, Enemuoh E, Kwofie S (2017) Life cycle assessment of supercritical coal power plant with carbon capture and sequestration in China. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology 1(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEE/2016/31400
CEA (2014) Recommendations on operation norms for thermal power stations tariff period — 2014–19. Central electricity authority (CEA) Retrieved from https://cercind.gov.in/2013/whatsnew/Sop.pdf
CEA Annual Report 2020–2021 (2020) Central Electricity Authority Ministry of Power, Government of India. Retrieved from https://cea.nic.in/annual-report/?lang=en
CEA Recommendatons on Operation Norms for Thermal Generating Stations (2019) Retrieved from CEA. https://cercind.gov.in/2020/draft_reg/Appendix%20I.pdf
Central Electricity Authority (CEA) (2013) Standard technical features of BTG system for supercritical 660/800 MW thermal units
Central Pollution Control Board (2018) Retrieved from MoEFCC: https://cpcb.nic.in/NGT/Annexure_3.1_27.02.2018.pdf
CERC (2013) Summary of the comments and suggestions received on Approach Paper on Terms and Conditions of Tariff Regulations for the tariff period 1.4.2014 to 31.3.2019. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Retrieved from https://cercind.gov.in/2013/regulation/Comments/Transit_Handling_Losses.pdf
CERC (2019) Recommendations on operation norms for thermal generating stations for the tariff period 2019–24. CEA, MoP, GOI Retrieved from https://cercind.gov.in/2018/draft_reg/CEA%20Recommendations%20for%20thermal%20generating%20stations%20for%20tariff%20period%202109-24.pdf
Cho HH, Strezov V (2020) A comparative review on the environmental impacts of combustion-based electricity generation technologies. Energy Fuels 34(9):10486–10502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02139
Coal (2021) Analysis and forecast to 2024. International Energy Agency Retrieved from www.iea.org
CPCB (2017) Thermal power plants overview. CPCB Central Pollution Control Board Retrieved from https://cpcb.nic.in/uploads/Thermal_Power_Plant_overview.pdf
Dunmade I, Madushele N, Adedeji PA, Akinlabi ET (2019) A streamlined life cycle assessment of a coal-fired power plant: the South African case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:18484–18492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05227-6
Economic survey 2021-2022 (2021) Retrieved from https://www.thehinducentre.com/resources/article38354164.ece/binary/Economic%20Survey%20Complete%20PDF.pdf
Ganguly D, Dey S, Arora LK, Sharma S, Singh I, Shubham, Nandi I (2022) Study to assess the compliance of thermal power plants in India to new SO2 emission norms (2015) and lay out phased plan for FGD implementation. Centre for Atmospheric Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Delhi. Retrieved from https://cas.iitd.ac.in/
Gilardi M, Rigamonti L (2021) LCA methodology application to assess the environmental impact of CCS and CCU: A review. Atti del XIV Convegno della Rete Italiana LCA-IX Convegno dell’Associazione Rete Italiana LCA: La sostenibilità della LCA tra sfide globali e competitività delle organizzazioni 155–164. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1189425
Government of India Ministry of Power (2022) Retrieved 2022, from https://powermin.gov.in/en/content/power-sector-glance-all-india
Han X, Chen N, Yan J, Liu J, Liu M, Karellas S (2019) Thermodynamic analysis and life cycle assessment of supercritical pulverized coal-fired power plant integrated with No. 0 feedwater preheater partial loads. J Clean Prod 233:1106–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.159
Harrison GP, Karamanlis S, Ochoa LF (2010) Life cycle assessment of the transmission network in Great Britain. Energy Policy 38(7):3622–3631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.039
Huijbregts MA, Steinmann ZJ, Elshout PM, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira MDM, Hollander A, Zijp M, van Zelm R (2016) ReCiPe 2016: A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level report I: characterization. Retrieved from https://rivm.openrepository.com/handle/10029/620793
IECM (2021) Integrated Environmental Control Model (IECM) Version 11.5. Carnegie Mellon University https://www.cmu.edu/epp/iecm/index.html
India’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (2015) Retrieved from https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/India%20First/INDIA%20INDC%20TO%20UNFCCC.pdf.
Indian Railways (2000) Retrieved from https://irimee.indianrailways.gov.in/instt/uploads/files/1477552238861-Specific_Fuel_Consumption.pdf
International Finance Corporation (IFC) (2017) Environmental, health, and safety guidelines for thermal power plants. International Finance Corporation World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9ec08f40-9bc9-4c6b-9445-b3aed5c9afad/Thermal+Power+Guideline+2017+clean.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=lNwcJZX
Jung HS, Ryoo SG, Kang YT (2022) Life cycle environmental impact assessment of Taean coal power plant with CO2 capture module. J Clean Prod. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131663
Khanda DK, Pal BK, Mahananda MR (2018) Assessment of environmental impacts of coal mining in Lakhanpur Opencast Project of Ib Valley Coalfield, Odisha using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) model. ICOMS Retrieved 2018 from http://dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/3195/1/2018_ICOMS%20_BKPal_AssessmentEnvironmental.pdf
Liang X, Wang Z, Zhou Z, Huang Z, Zhou J, Cen K (2013) Up-to-date life cycle assessment and comparison study of clean coal power generation technologies in China. J Clean Prod 39(2013):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.003
Mahanadi Coalfields Limited (2020) https://www.mahanadicoal.in. Retrieved from https://www.cgijoburg.gov.in/pdf/Notice+EoI%20document.pdf
Malode S, Mohanta J, Prakash R (2022) A review on life cycle assessment approach on thermal power generation. Mater Today: Proc 56:791–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.258
Matin NS, Flanagan WP (2022) Life cycle assessment of amine-based versus ammonia-based post combustion CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 113:103535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103535
Mingjia L, Ge W, Jinliang X, Jingwei N, Enhui S (2020) Life cycle assessment analysis and comparison of 1000 MW S-CO2 coal fired power plant and 1000 MW USC water-steam coal-fired power plant. J Therm Sci 31(2):463–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-020-1327-x
Nagarkatti A, Kolar A (2015) Assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from coal fired power plants in India. Appl Mech Mater 704(2015):487–490. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.704.487
NOx control technologies for thermal power stations (2018) Centre for Science and Environment. Retrieved from https://cdn.cseindia.org/attachments/0.76763300_1533289119_NOx-Control-Technologies-for-Thermal-Power-Stations-Factsheet.pdf
Odeh NA, Cockerill T (2008) Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants. Energy Convers Manag 49(2):212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.06.014
Pachouri R, Saxena AK (2020) Emissions control in thermal power stations: issues, challenges, and the way forward. The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi
Paris Agreement. United Nations. (2015)
Petrescu L, Bonalumi D, Valenti G, Cormos A-M, Cormos C-C (2017) Life cycle assessment for supercritical pulverized coal power plants with post-combustion carbon capture and storage. J Clean Prod 157:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.225
Prakash R (2021) Net energy and feasible economic growth: a developing country perspective from India. Insights Into Reg Dev 3(3):106–113. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2021.3.3(6)
Rai V, Raman N, Choudhary S (2013) Mercury emissions control from coal fired thermal power plants in India: Critical review & suggested Policy measures. Int J Eng Res Technol 2(11):2278–0181
Rasheed R, Javed H, Rizwan A, Sharif F, Yasar A, Tabinda A, Su Y (2020) Life cycle assessment of a cleaner supercritical coal-fired power plant. J Clean Prod 279:123869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123869
Restrepo A, Bazzo E, Miyake R (2015) A life cycle assessment of the Brazilian coal used for electric power generation. J Clean Prod 92:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.065
Roychoudhury S, Khanda DK (2016) Application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in coal mining. 6th Asian Mining Congress, pp 23–26
Schreiber A, Zapp P, Markewitz P, Vogele S (2010) Environmental analysis of a German strategy for carbon capture and storage of coal powe rplants. Energy Policy 38:7873–7883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.006
Sengupta D (2017) Coal India looks to cut power producers’ transport costs. The Economic Times: Industry Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/indl-goods/svs/metals-mining/coal-india-looks-to-cut-power-producers-transport-costs/articleshow/61192411.cms?from=mdr
Shah B, Unnikrishnan S (2020) Model for life cycle sustainability assessment of coal based electricity generation in India. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-223443/v1
Singh U, Rao A (2016) Techno-economic assessment of carbon mitigation options for existing coal-fired power plants in India. Energy Procedia:326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.200
Singh U, Sharma N, Mahapatra S (2016) Environmental life cycle assessment of Indian coal-fired power plants. Int J Coal Sci Technol 3(2):215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-016-0136-z
Srinivasan S, Kholod N, Chaturvedi V, Ghosh P, Mathur R, Clarke L, Sharma K (2018) Water for electricity in India: A multi-model study of future challenges and linkages to climate change mitigation. Appl Energy 210:673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.079
Sultan H, Bhatti UH, Muhammad HA, Nam SC, Baek IH (2021) Modification of post-combustion CO2 capture process: a techno-economic analysis. Greenhouse Gases Sci Technol 11(1):165–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2042
Tang L, Yokoyamaa T, Kubota H, Shimota A (2014) Life cycle assessment of a pulverized coal-fired power plant with CCS technology in Japan. Energy Procedia 63:7437–7443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.780
Transmission and Distribution in India (2017) POWERGRID. Retrieved from https://npti.gov.in/sites/default/files/download-document/world_energy_council_report.pdf.
Wang Y, Pan Z, Zhang W, Borhani TN, Li R, Zhang Z (2022) Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review. Environ Res 207:112219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112219
WorldData.info (2022) Retrieved from https://www.worlddata.info/asia/india/climate.php#:~:text=The%20climate%20in%20India%20is,of%20the%20country%20is%20Rajasthan
Yu P, Luo Z, Wang Q, Fang M (2019) Life cycle assessment of transformation from a sub-critical power plant into a polygeneration plant. Energy Convers Manag 198:11180
Yujia W, Zhaofeng X, Zheng L (2014) Lifecycle analysis of coal-fired power plants with CCS in China. Energy Procedia 63:7444–7451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.781
Zhang Y, Zheng C, Liu S, Qu R, Yang Y, Zhao H, Yang Z, Zhu Y, Gao X (2019) An investigation of SO3 control routes in ultra-low emission coal-fired power plants. Aerosol Air Qual Res 19(12):2908–2916. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.09.042
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Satyajit Malode: conception, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and drafting the article. Ravi Prakash: review, editing, and supervising the work. Jagdish Chandra Mohanta: supervision and review of work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The authors declare that this material is the authors’ own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere.
Consent to participate
The authors understand that their participation is voluntary and that they are free to withdraw at any time and authors voluntarily agree to take part in this study.
Consent for publication
The authors give their consent for the publication of identifiable details, which can include case history and details within the text to be published in the above Journal and Article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Loubet
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Malode, S., Prakash, R. & Mohanta, J.C. A life cycle assessment of coal-fired thermal power plants with post-combustion control techniques: an India scenario. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 90639–90655 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28447-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28447-3