Abstract
Accurate calculation of discharge is a critical task in terms of environmental and operational regulations. In the current study, a new approach for determining vertical sluice gates’ flow discharge with a minor bias is proposed. Energy-momentum equations are used to characterize the physical expression of the phenomena intended for generation of the coefficient of discharge. The coefficient of discharge is then expressed according to coefficients of energy loss and contraction. Following that, the coefficient of discharge, coefficient of contraction, and coefficient of energy loss are calculated using an optimization approach. Then, dimensional analysis is conducted and regression equations for quantifying the coefficient of energy loss is produced using symbolic regression method. The derived contraction coefficient and energy loss coefficient formulas are accordingly utilized to compute the coefficient of discharge in the vertical sluice gate and also to determine flow discharge. For computing discharge, five different scenarios are considered. The developed approaches’ performance is examined against selected benchmarks from the literature. The results show that the symbolic regression method can compute discharge more accurate than its alternatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data are available by the corresponding author upon request.
Code availability
The codes are available by the corresponding author upon request.
References
Alminagorta O, Merkley GP (2009) Transitional flow between orifice and nonorifice regimes at a rectangular sluice gate. J Irrig Drain Eng 135(3):382–387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000071
Ansar M, Ferro V (2001) Simultaneous Flow over and under a Gate. J Irrig Drain Eng 127(5):325–328
Augusto D A, Barbosa H J (2000) Symbolic regression via genetic programming. Proceedings. Vol. 1. Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks,
Bagherzadeh M, Mousavi F, Manafpour M, Mirzaee R, Hoseini K (2022) Numerical simulation and application of soft computing in estimating vertical drop energy dissipation with horizontal serrated edge. Water Supply 22(4):4676–4689. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.127
Belaud G, Cassan L, Baume J-P (2009) Calculation of contraction coefficient under sluice gates and application to discharge measurement. J Hydraul Eng 135(12):1086–1091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000122
Belaud G, Cassan L, Baume J-P (2012) Contraction and correction coefficients for energy-momentum balance under sluice gates. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries
Bijankhan M, Kouchakzadeh S, Belaud G (2017) Application of the submerged experimental velocity profiles for the sluice gate's stage-discharge relationship. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 54:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.11.009
Bos M (1976) Discharge measurement structures, vol No. 161. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Delft, Netherlands. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/333324
Cassan L, Belaud G (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation of flow under sluice gates. J Hydraul Eng 138(4):367–373. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000514
Castro-Orgaz O, Lozano D, Mateos L (2010) Energy and momentum velocity coefficients for calibrating submerged sluice gates in irrigation canals. J Irrig Drain Eng 136(9):610–616. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000233
Castro-Orgaz O, Mateos L, Dey S (2013) Revisiting the energy-momentum method for rating vertical sluice gates under submerged flow conditions. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(4):325–335. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000552
Chen W, Sharifrazi D, Liang G, Band SS, Chau KW, Mosavi A (2022) Accurate discharge coefficient prediction of streamlined weirs by coupling linear regression and deep convolutional gated recurrent unit. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 16(1):965–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2022.2053786
Cheng AH, Liu PL, Liggett JA (1981) Boundary calculations of sluice and spillway flows. J Hydraul Div 107(10):1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0005740
Clemmens A, Strelkoff T, Replogle J (2003) Calibration of submerged radial gates. J Hydraul Eng 129(9):680–687. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:9(680)
Fardjeli N (2007) Modélisation d’ouvrages de régulation pour l’aide à la gestion des canaux MS thesis, Montpellier Supagro, France, 57 (in French)].
Ferro V (2000) Simultaneous flow over and under a gate. J Irrig Drain Eng 126(3):190–193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2000)126:3(190)
Ferro V (2001) Closure to ‘Simultaneous flow over and under a gate’by V Ferro. J Irrig Drain Eng 127(5):326–328
Ferro V (2018) Testing the stage-discharge relationship of a sharp crested sluice gate deduced by the momentum equation for a free-flow condition. Flow Meas Instrum 63:14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.07.002
Ferro V, Ziaei AN, Nikou N, Nourolahi M, Beheshti A (2019) New stage-discharge relationship for cylindrical and semi-cylindrical edged sluice gates. Flow Meas Instrum 70:101639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101639
Habibzadeh A, Vatankhah AR, Rajaratnam N (2011) Role of energy loss on discharge characteristics of sluice gates. J Hydraul Eng 137(9):1079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000406
Haghbin M, Sharafati A (2022) A review of studies on estimating the discharge coefficient of flow control structures based on the soft computing models. Flow Meas Instrum:102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.102119
Hammed MM, AlOmar MK, Khaleel F, Al-Ansari N (2021) An extra tree regression model for discharge coefficient prediction: novel, practical applications in the hydraulic sector and future research directions. Math Probl Eng 2021:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7001710
Henderson F M (1996) Open channel flow. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:344562
Henry H (1950) Discussion of Diffusion of submerged jets. ASCE, Transaction
Hu X, Shi L, Lin G, Lin L (2021) Comparison of physical-based, data-driven and hybrid modeling approaches for evapotranspiration estimation. J Hydrol 601:126592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126592
Iraji H, Mohammadi M, Shakouri B, Gajbhiye Meshram S (2020) Predicting reservoir volume reduction using artificial neural network. Arab J Geosci 13(17):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05772-2
Khosravi K, Khozani ZS, M Melesse A, Crookston BM (2022b) Intelligent flow discharge computation in a rectangular channel with free overfall condition. Neural Comput Appl:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07112-9
Khosravi K, Safari MJS, Sheikh Khozani Z, Crookston B, Golkarian A (2022a) Stacking ensemble-based hybrid algorithms for discharge computation in sharp-crested labyrinth weirs. Soft Comput 26(22):12271–12290. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-729477/v1
Klotz D, Herrnegger M, Schulz K (2017) Symbolic regression for the estimation of transfer functions of hydrological models. Water Resour Res 53(11):9402–9423. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021253
Lin C-H, Yen J-F, Tsai C-T (2002) Influence of sluice gate contraction coefficient on distinguishing condition. J Irrig Drain Eng 128(4):249–252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2002)128:4(249)
Montes J (1997) Irrotational flow and real fluid effects under planar sluice gates. J Hydraul Eng 123(3):219–232. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:3(219)
Nouri M, Sihag P, Kisi O, Hemmati M, Shahid S, Adnan RM (2023) Prediction of the Discharge Coefficient in Compound Broad-Crested-Weir Gate by Supervised Data Mining Techniques. Sustainability 15(1):433. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010433
Olyaie E, Banejad H, Heydari M (2019) Estimating discharge coefficient of PK-weir under subcritical conditions based on high-accuracy machine learning approaches. Iran J Sci Technol - Trans Civ Eng 43:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0150-z
Rajaratnam N, Humphries J (1982) Free flow upstream of vertical sluice gates. J Hydraul Res 20(5):427–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688209499471
Rajaratnam N, Subramanya K (1967a) Flow equation for the sluice gate. J Irrig Drain Div 93(3):167–186. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0000503
Rajaratnam N, Subramanya K (1967b) Flow immediately below submerged sluice gate. J Hydraul Div 93(4):57–77. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0001667
Roth A, Hager WH (1999) Underflow of standard sluice gate. Exp Fluids 27(4):339–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050358
Salmasi F, Nouri M, Sihag P, Abraham J (2021) Application of SVM, ANN, GRNN, RF, GP and RT models for predicting discharge coefficients of oblique sluice gates using experimental data. Water Suppl 21(1):232–248. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.226
Seber GA, Lee AJ (2012) Linear regression analysis. John Wiley Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471722199
Sepúlveda C, Gómez M, Rodellar J (2009) Benchmark of discharge calibration methods for submerged sluice gates. J Irrig Drain Eng 135(5):676–682. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000013
Shayan HK, Farhoudi J (2013) Effective parameters for calculating discharge coefficient of sluice gates. Flow Meas Instrum 33:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2013.06.001
Swamee PK (1992) Sluice-gate discharge equations. J Irrig Drain Eng 118(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1992)118:1(56)
Tao H, Jamei M, Ahmadianfar I, Khedher KM, Farooque AA, Yaseen ZM (2022) Discharge coefficient prediction of canal radial gate using neurocomputing models: an investigation of free and submerged flow scenarios. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 16(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.2002721
Vaheddoost B, Fathian F, Gul E, Safari MJS (2022) Studying the Changes in the Hydro-Meteorological Components of Water Budget in Lake Urmia. Water Resour Res 58(7):e2022WR032030. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032030
Vaheddoost B, Safari MJS, Zeynali RI (2021) Discharge coefficient for vertical sluice gate under submerged condition using contraction and energy loss coefficients. Flow Meas Instrum 80:102007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.102007
Viero DP, Defina A (2019) Multiple states in the flow through a sluice gate. J Hydraul Res 57(1):39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2018.1434694
Wahl TL (2005) Refined energy correction for calibration of submerged radial gates. J Hydraul Eng 131(6):457–466. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:6(457)
Wang Y, Wagner N, Rondinelli JM (2019) Symbolic regression in materials science. MRS Commun 9(3):793–805. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2019.85
Acknowledgement
This study was conducted during the stay of the first and second authors (Shakouri, B. and Ismail, I.) as visiting PhD students at Civil Engineering Department of Yaşar University under the supervision of the third author (Safari, M.J.S.). The first author (Shakouri, B.) would like to acknowledge the Project Evaluation Commission (PEC) of Yaşar University for financial support during his stay. First author (Shakouri, B.) thanks deputy head of research and technology affairs and the director international relations office at Urmia University for their support. The second author (Ismail, I.) would like to acknowledge the director international relations office at University of Ruse for supporting to visit Civil Engineering Department of Yaşar University as a visiting PhD Erasmus student. Authors appreciate Dr. Enes Gul from Inonu University for his great contributions in this study.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Behzad Shakouri: Writing - original draft, Formal analysis, Investigation; Software, Methodology, Imren Ismail: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft; Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Supervision, Writing - review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shakouri, B., Ismail, I. & Safari, M.J.S. Energy loss and contraction coefficients-based vertical sluice gate’s discharge coefficient under submerged flow using symbolic regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 76853–76866 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27388-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27388-1