Abstract
The Chinese government actively participates in global climate governance and has proposed to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2060. Due to large differences in regional development, local governments need to comprehend their own carbon neutrality status and then scientifically plan a path to achieve carbon neutrality. In this study, we constructed a new carbon neutrality capacity evaluation indicator system named CNCIS, which can dynamically reflect the balance of energy, economy and environment in the process of reducing carbon emissions. In addition, to scientifically evaluate the carbon neutrality capacity, we proposed a novel comprehensive evaluation model, namely, the BWM-Entropy TOPSIS method, which can solve the unbalanced weighting and low efficiency problem in weighting indicators and improve the applicability of TOPSIS. Finally, based on real data from 30 provinces in China, we proved the effectiveness of our method and analyse the reasons for the different carbon neutrality capacities of the provinces. The main findings are as follows: (1) Clean and efficient utilization of energy had the greatest impact on achieving carbon neutrality, which is mainly represented by carbon emissions intensity, CO2 emissions per capita and coal consumption per capita. (2) In the energy, economy and environmental aspects, the factors that most affect carbon neutrality were carbon emissions intensity, the volume of technology marketing and water consumption per capita respectively. (3) Sorted by carbon neutrality capacities, the provinces could be divided into three categories, in which economically developed provinces more easily achieve carbon neutrality while resource-based provinces are the hardest. Based on these results, corresponding suggestions were proposed to help local governments scientifically plan a path to achieve carbon neutrality.
Graphical abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable
Change history
26 August 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22708-3
References
Abosedra S, Dah A, Ghosh S (2009) Electricity consumption and economic growth, the case of Lebanon. Appl Energy 86:429–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.06.011
Agency IE (2019) Total energy supply (tes) by source, people’s republic of China 1990-2019. https://www.iea.org/countries/china. Accessed 18 Dec 2021
Alam M, Begum I, Buysse J, Van Huylenbroeck G (2012) Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth nexus in Bangladesh: Cointegration and dynamic causality analysis. Energy Policy 45:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.022
Azam Khan M, Qayyum Khan A, Abdullah H, Qureshi M (2016) The impact of co2 emissions on economic growth: evidence from selected higher co2 emissions economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:6376–6389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5817-4
Cao Y, Bian Y (2021) Improving the ecological environmental performance to achieve carbon neutrality: The application of dpsir-improved matter-element extension cloud model. J Environ Manage 293:112887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112887
Chen C-H (2020) A novel multi-criteria decision-making model for building material supplier selection based on entropy-ahp weighted topsis. Entropy 22(2):259. https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/2/259. Accessed 15 Jan 2022
Chen D, Liu Y (2019) Evaluation model of energy-economy-environment(3e) system coordinating degree: Empirical analysis on China regionally. In: IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science, vol 237. p 042037
Du J, Cai C, Xie Z, Geng M (2020) Comprehensive energy efficiency evaluation of municipal power grid based on topsis method. In: 2020 5th asia conference on power and electrical engineering (ACPEE). pp. 829–833. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACPEE48638.2020.9136435
Han J, Du T, Zhang C, Qian X (2018) Correlation analysis of co2 emissions, material stocks and economic growth nexus: Evidence from Chinese Provinces. J Clean Prod 180:395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.168
Huang B, Xing K, Pullen S, Liao L (2020) Exploring carbon neutral potential in urban densification: A precinct perspective and scenario analysis. Sustainability 12:4814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124814
Li Q, Long R, Chen H (2018) Measurements and factors that influence the carbon capability of urban residents in china. Sustainability 10:1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041292
Li K, Ma M, Xiang X, Feng W, Ma Z, Cai W, Ma X (2022) Carbon reduction in commercial building operations: A provincial retrospection in China. Appl Energy 306:118098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118098. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921013799
Lin S-S, Shen S-L, Zhang N, Zhou A (2021) Comprehensive environmental impact evaluation for concrete mixing station (cms) based on improved topsis method. Sustain Cities Soc 69:102838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102838
Mu X, Kong L, Tu C, Chen J, Hu G (2021) Correlation and synergy analysis of urban economy-energy-environment system—a case study of Beijing. Natural Resource Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12329
Niu D, Wu G, Ji Z, Wang D, Li Y, Gao T (2021) Evaluation of provincial carbon neutrality capacity of china based on combined weight and improved topsis model. Sustainability 13(5):2777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052777
Nyimbili PH, Erden T (2020) A hybrid approach integrating entropy-AHP and GIS for suitability assessment of urban emergency facilities. Int J Geo-Inform 9(7):419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070419
Pilpola S, Arabzadeh V, Mikkola J, Lund PD (2019) Analyzing national and local pathways to carbon-neutrality from technology, emissions, and resilience perspectives-case of Finland. Energies 12(5):949
Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
Sadjadi S, Karimi M (2018) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A robust approach. Decision Science Letters 7:323–340. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2018.3.003
Song J, Yang W, Wang S, Wang X, Higano Y (2018) Exploring potential pathways towards fossil energy-related ghg emission peak prior to 2030 for China: An integrated input-output simulation model. J Clean Prod 178:688–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.062
Song Y, Li X, Li Y, Hong X (2020) Assessing the risk of an investment project using an improved topsis method. Appl Econ Lett 27(16):1334–1339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1679339
Sun Z, Ma Z, Ma M, Cai W, Xiang X, Zhang S, Chen M, Chen L (2022) Carbon peak and carbon neutrality in the building sector: A bibliometric review. Buildings 12(2):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020128
Taşabat S (2019) A novel multicriteria decision-making method based on distance, similarity, and correlation: Dsc topsis. Math Probl Eng 2019:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9125754
Tolvanen J-P (1998) Incremental method engineering with modeling tools: theoretical principles and empirical evidence. Jyväskylän yliopisto. Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics 47:301
Uribe-Toril J, Ruiz-Real JL, Milán-García J, de Pablo Valenciano J (2019) Energy, economy, and environment: A worldwide research update. Energies 12(6):1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061120
Wang Y, Song J, Zhang X, Sun H (2021) Sustainable development evaluation and its obstacle factors of the Weihe river basin in Shaanxi Province, China. Front Earth Sci 9:789. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.744224
Wu K, Peng B, Xie H, Zhan S (2020) A coefficient of variation method to measure the extents of decentralization for bitcoin and Ethereum networks. International Journal of Network Security 22(2):191–200
Xiang X, Ma X, Ma Z, Ma M (2022) Operational carbon change in commercial buildings under the carbon neutral goal: A lasso-woa approach. Buildings 12(1):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010054
Xiang X, Ma X, Ma Z, Ma M, Cai W (2022) Python-lmdi: A tool for index decomposition analysis of building carbon emissions. Buildings 12(1):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010083
Yan Q, Wang X, Baležentis T, Streimikiene D (2018) Energy-environmental (3e) performance of Chinese regions based on the data envelopment analysis model with mixed assumptions on disposability. Energy & Environment 29(5):664–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18757057
Yan G, Zheng Y, Wang X, Li B, He J, Shao Z, Li Y, Wu L, Ding Y, Xu W, Li X, Cai B, Chen X, Song X, Wang Q, Lei Y, Wang J (2022) Pathway for carbon dioxide peaking in China based on sectoral analysis. Res Environ Sci 35
Yuan M, Zhang H, Wang B, Shen R, Long Y, Liang Y (2019) Future scenario of China’s downstream oil supply chain: An energy, economy and environment analysis for impacts of pipeline network reform. J Clean Prod 232:1513–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.340
Zhao H, Li J (2021) Energy efficiency evaluation and optimization of industrial park customers based on psr model and improved grey-topsis method. IEEE Access 9:76423–76432. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3081142
Zhao X, Zhang Y, Liang J, Li Y, Jia R, Wang L (2018) The sustainable development of the economic-energy-environment (3e) system under the carbon trading (ct) mechanism: A chinese case. Sustainability 10(1):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010098
Zhao J, Duan Y, Liu X (2019) Study on the policy of replacing coal-fired boilers with gas-fired boilers for central heating based on the 3e system and the topsis method: A case in tianjin, china. Energy 189:116206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116206
Zuo Y, Shi Y-l, Zhang Y-z (2017) Research on the sustainable development of an economic-energy-environment (3e) system based on system dynamics (sd): A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China. Sustainability 9(10):1727. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101727
Funding
Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China (grant no. 21&ZD133).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yutong Chun’s contribution is research, design, data collection and writing; Jun Zhang’s contribution is research and proofreading; Baodong Sun’s contribution is research and design.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Permission to publish research findings.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz
The original online version of this article was revised: The correct Equation 5 is shown below. \({\mathrm{Growth \, rate\, of\, carbon \, emissions}} = \frac{\mathrm{This \, year's \, carbon\, emissions - Last\, year's \, carbon \, emissions}}{\mathrm{Last \, year's \, carbon \, emissions}}\).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chun, Y., Zhang, J. & Sun, B. Evaluation of carbon neutrality capacity based on a novel comprehensive model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 3953–3968 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22199-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22199-2