Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A review on the application of industrial waste as reinforced earth fills in mechanically stabilized earth retaining walls

  • Research on Sustainable Developments for Environment Management
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The infrastructure development of a country is focussed on the development of roadways that includes the construction of many bridges and flyovers with retaining walls. The construction of the mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining wall gained momentum since 1960 owing to the various beneficial aspects in terms of its durability, economy, stability, appearance, sustainability aspects, etc. A typical MSE retaining wall is a composite structure made up of compacted backfill and reinforcement elements, fixed to a wall facing. The increasing rate of urbanization leads to the development of more industries resulting in the production of wastes such as fly ash, waste foundry sand, pond ash, slags, etc. The disposal of these wastes is often a big issue for the industries, and hence, their utilization in the construction industry is studied by researchers to solve the problem of waste dumping. This review article summarizes the studies involving the potential use of industrial waste material as reinforced earth fills in the MSE retaining wall. The researchers used waste materials from industries like thermal power plant, mining, construction, metal smelting units etc. The important fill properties such as particle size, friction angle, and density were compared with the standard codal provisions. The different dimensions of the research experiments involving the MSE backfill using various industrial wastes were presented in this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Aali P, Manoj D, Venkata RG, and Abinash M (2020) “Utilization of pond ash as structural fill material in reinforced soil structures.” Geo-Congress 2019, Proceedings.

  • Agarwal A, Ziemke D, and Nagel K (2019) “Bicycle superhighway: an environmentally sustainable policy for urban transport.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, (June), 1–22.

  • Ahad MA, Paiva S, Tripathi G, Feroz N (2020) Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc 61(June):102301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A, Manager G, and Reinforced N (2016) “Carbon critical design: comparison of RE wall and RC viaduct on the Benz Circle Flyover, Andhra Pradesh.”

  • Arulrajah A, Rahman MA, Piratheepan J, Bo MW, Imteaz MA (2013) Interface shear strength testing of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials. Adv Civil Eng Mater 2(1):20120055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun AL, Marks D, Sharma R, Shekhar H, Balmes C, Maheng D, Arshad A, Salehi P (2020) Assessing the potentials of digitalization as a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in urban centres. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balunaini U, Yoon S, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2014) Pullout response of uniaxial geogrid in tire shred-sand mixtures. Geotech Geol Eng 32(2):505–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banu SS, Kartikeyan J, Jayabalan P (2020) Influence of using agro-waste as a partial replacement in cement on the compressive strength of concrete – a statistical approach. Construc Build Mater 250:118746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman P, and Singh B (2019) “Strength characteristics of sand amended with two waste materials - fly ash and scrap tyre.” Environmental Processes, Environmental Processes.

  • Bhardwj B, Kumar P (2017) Waste foundry sand in concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 156:661–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmik R, Datta M, Shahu JT (2019) Pullout behaviour of geosynthetics—a review of laboratory testing techniques. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bleakley AM, Cosentino PJ, Kalajian EH, Patel MJ (2014) Strength and creep characteristics of reclaimed asphalt pavement-sand blend backfill in mechanically stabilized earth walls. Transp Res Rec 2462:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Electricity Authority (2018) “CEA Annual Report 2017–18.” Annual Report, 248.

  • Cetin B, Aydilek AH, Li L (2014) Trace metal leaching from embankment soils amended with high-carbon fly ash. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(1):1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Damians IP, Bathurst RJ, Adroguer EG, Josa A, Lloret A (2014) Environmental assessment of earth retaining wall structures. Environ Geotech 4(6):415–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhatrak AI, Gandhi N (2016) Bearing capacity of footing on reinforced flyash slope. Int J Eng Res Appl 6(8):56–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Diotti A, Plizzari G, Sorlini S (2021) Technical analysis of full-scale construction and demolition waste treatment plants: case studies of the Lombardy region, Italy. Detritus 15:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edil TB (2008) A review of environmental impacts and environmental applications of shredded scrap tires. In: Mer A (ed) Scrap tire derived geomaterials-opportunities and challenges. Taylor and Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury MP, Santos ECG, Lins Da Silva J, Palmeira EM (2019) Geogrid installation damage caused by recycled construction and demolition waste. Geosynth Int 26(6):641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foose GJ, Benson CH, Bosscher PJ (1996) Sand reinforced with shredded waste tires. J Geotech Eng 122(9):760–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorai B, Jana RK, Premchand (2003) Characteristics and utilisation of copper slag - A review. Resour Conserv Recycl 39(4):299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajiazizi M, Mirnaghizadeh MH, Nasiri M (2019) Experimental study of sand slopes reinforced by waste tires. Int J Min Geo-Eng 53(2):183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazra S, Patra NR (2008) Performance of counterfort walls with reinforced granular and fly ash backfills: experimental investigation. Geotech Geol Eng 26(3):259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennebert P, Lambert S, Fouillen F, Charrasse B (2014) Assessing the environmental impact of shredded tires as embankment fill material. Can Geotech J 51(5):469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandolkar SS, Mandal JN (2015) Behaviour of reinforced stone dust model walls under uniformly distributed loading. Geotech Spec Publ 256:2627–2636

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirthika SK, Singh SK, Chourasia A (2020) Alternative fine aggregates in production of sustainable concrete - a review. J Clean Prod 268:122089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Mandal JN (2017) Effect of reinforcement on multi-tiered fly ash wall. Proc Eng 189(May):446–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar KPB, Umashankar B (2018) Interface studies on geogrid and fly ash. Geotech Spec Publ 2018:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar KPB, Krishna G, Umashankar B (2019) Evaluation of waste foundry sand and blast furnace steel slag as geomaterials. Geo-Congress 2019 GSP 312:304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, B. R. R., V.B.Deshmukh, J.N.Mandal, and T.Mandal. (2011). “Cellular reinforced fly ash retaining wall - experimental and finite element analysis.” 1–4.

  • Lal BRR, Mandal JN (2014) Behavior of cellular-reinforced fly-ash walls under strip loading. J Hazard Toxic Radioactive Waste 18(1):45–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH, Salgado R, Bernal A, Lovell CW (1999) Shredded tires and rubbers and ash. Manager 125(February):132–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li LH, Chen YJ, Ferreira PMV, Liu Y, Xiao HL (2017) Experimental investigations on the pull-out behavior of tire strips reinforced sands. Materials 10(7):707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahedi M, Cetin B, Dayioglu AY (2019) Leaching behavior of aluminum, copper, iron and zinc from cement activated fly ash and slag stabilized soils. Waste Manag 95:334–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahedi M, Cetin B, Dayioglu AY (2020) Effect of cement incorporation on the leaching characteristics of elements from fly ash and slag treated soils. J Environ Manag 253:109720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen AW, Mandal JN (2017) Behaviour of bamboo–geogrid reinforced fly ash wall under applied strip load. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 3(3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijic Z, Dayioglu AY, Hatipoglu M, Aydilek AH (2020) Hydraulic and environmental impacts of using recycled asphalt pavement on highway shoulders. Const Build Mater 234:117226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula K, Izydorczyk G, Skrzypczak D, Moustakas K, Witek-Krowiak A, Chojnacka K (2021) Value-added strategies for the sustainable handling, disposal, or value-added use of copper smelter and refinery wastes. J Hazard Mater 403:123602

  • Mohan VKD, Kim H, Balunaini U, Prezzi M (2016) Pullout capacity of ladder-type metal reinforcements in tire shred-sand mixtures. Constr Build Mater 113:544–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaf MB, Mandal JN (2016) Model studies on fly ash slopes reinforced with planar steel grids. Int J Geotech Eng 11(1):20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaf MB, Mandal JN (2017a) Behavior of reinforced fly ash slopes with cellular mattress and strips under strip loading. J Hazard Toxic Radioactive Waste 21(4):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaf MB, Mandal JN (2017b) Model studies on fly ash slopes reinforced with planar steel grids. Int J Geotech Eng 11(1):20–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy V, Garga VK (2000) Tire-reinforced earthfill. Part 2: pull-out behaviour and reinforced slope design. Can Geotech J 37(1):97–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osmanlioglu AE (2014) Utilization of coal fly ash in solidification of liquid radioactive waste from research reactor. Waste Manage Res 32(5):366–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pant A, Datta M, Ramana GV (2019a) Bottom ash as a backfill material in reinforced soil structures. Geotextiles Geomembr 47(4):514–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pant A, Datta M, Ramana GV, Bansal D (2019) Measurement of role of transverse and longitudinal members on pullout resistance of PET geogrid. Measur J Int Measur Confeder 148:106944

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant A, Datta M, VenkataRamana G, Mahanta A (2019) Utilization of pond ash as structural fill material in reinforced soil structures. Geo-Congress 2019:203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant A, Ramana GV, Datta M, Gupta SK (2019d) Coal combustion residue as structural fill material for reinforced soil structures. J Clean Prod 232:417–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge BK, Fox PJ, Alleman JE, Mast DG (1999) Field demonstration of highway embankment construction using waste foundry sand. Transp Res Rec 1670(1):98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad PS, Ramana GV (2016a) Imperial smelting furnace (zinc) slag as a structural fill in reinforced soil structures. Geotext Geomembr 44(3):406–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad PS, Ramana GV (2016b) Feasibility study of copper slag as a structural fill in reinforced soil structures. Geotext Geomembr 44(4):623–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pundlik Shivaji Ware (2015) Pyrolysis of waste tyres and future Pyrolysis of waste tyres and future. Chem Biol 1(1):1–9

  • Ragossnig AM (2020) Construction and demolition waste – Major challenges ahead! Waste Manag Res 38(4):345–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje E, Trejo D, and Folliard K (2006). “Potential use of recycled asphalt pavement and crushed concrete as backfill for mechanically stabilized earth walls.” Center for transportation research The university of Texas at Austin, Project Summary Report 0–4177-S.

  • Ross DE (2020) Use of waste tyres in a circular economy. Waste Manag Res 38(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos ECG, Palmeira EM, Bathurst RJ (2013) Behaviour of a geogrid reinforced wall built with recycled construction and demolition waste backfill on a collapsible foundation. Geotext Geomembr 39:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos EC, Palmeira EM, Bathurst RJ (2014) Performance of two geosynthetic reinforced walls with recycled construction waste backfill and constructed on collapsible ground. Geosynth Int 21(4):256–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saribas I, Ok B (2019) Seismic performance of recycled aggregate–filled cantilever reinforced concrete retaining walls. Adv Mech Eng 11(4):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique R, Singh M, Jain M (2020) Recycling copper slag in steel fibre concrete for sustainable construction. J Clean Prod 271:122559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somvanshi A. (2019) India drowns in construction, demolition debris. Down to Earth

  • Srour IM, Chehab GR, El-Fadel M, Tamraz S (2013) Pilot-based assessment of the economics of recycling construction demolition waste. Waste Manag Res 31(11):1170–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajabadipour M, Marandi M (2017) Effect of rubber tire chips-sand mixtures on performance of geosynthetic reinforced earth walls. Period Polytech Civil Eng 61(2):322–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanchaisawat T, Bergado DT (2009) Interaction between geogrid and tire chips-sand mixture: pullout test simulation. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 43(5 SUPPL.):399–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanchaisawat T, Bergado DT, Voottipruex P, Shehzad K (2010) Interaction between geogrid reinforcement and tire chip-sand lightweight backfill. Geotext Geomembr 28(1):119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas T, Praveen A (2020) Energy parameters for ensuring sustainable use of building materials. J Clean Prod 276:122382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umashankar B, Prezzi M, and Salgado R (2014). “Pullout resistance factors of metal strips in tire shred-sand mixtures.” Geoenvironmental Engineering GSP 241 © ASCE 2014, 232–241.

  • United Nations. (2018). World Urbanization Prospects. Demographic Research.

  • Vashi JM, Desai AK, Solanki CH (2011) Study on cohesive soil and fly ash mixture as reinforced earth retaining wall filling material. J New Build Mater Constr World 16(10):220–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashi JM, Desai AK, and Solanki CH (2012) “Espousal of flyash + clay as innovative backfill material for construction of reinforced bridge embankment.” 1, 27–31.

  • Vieira CS (2020a) Valorization of fine-grain construction and demolition (C&D) waste in geosynthetic reinforced structures. Waste Biomass Valoriz 11(4):1615–1626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CS (2020b) Valorization of fine-grain construction and demolition (C&D) waste in geosynthetic reinforced structures. Waste Biomass Valoriz 11(4):1615–1626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CS, Pereira PM (2016) Interface shear properties of geosynthetics and construction and demolition waste from large-scale direct shear tests. Geosynth Int 23(1):62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CS, Pereira PM (2017) Use of mixed construction and demolition recycled materials in geosynthetic reinforced embankments. Indian Geotech J 48(2):279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CS, Pereira PM, Lopes MDL (2016) Recycled construction and demolition wastes as filling material for geosynthetic reinforced structures. Interface properties. J Clean Prod 124:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CS, Ferreira FB, Pereira PM, and Lopes M de L (2020) “Pullout behaviour of geosynthetics in a recycled construction and demolition material – effects of cyclic loading.” Transportation Geotechnics, 23(February).

  • Wadhwa S, Kumar JS (2017) Bearing capacity of strip footing rest on reinforced industrial slags and silty clay beneath. Int J Civil Eng 4(8):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DJ (2006) Reclaimed hydrated fly ash as a geomaterial. J Mater Civ Eng 18(2):206–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Yang J, Yang R, and Zhu J (2020) “Preparation and properties of engineered cementitious composites incorporating a high volume of fly ash.” Transport Res Record J Transport Res Board, 036119812091940.

  • Yu J, Mishra DK, Wu C, Leung CKY (2018) Very high volume fly ash green concrete for applications in India. Waste Manage Res 36(6):520–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Cai G, Duan W (2018) Strength and microstructure characteristics of the recycled rubber tire-sand mixtures as lightweight backfill. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(4):3872–3883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Writing — original draft preparation: Manjunath Nochikkuttai Venkatachalam.

Writing — review and editing: Manjunath Nochikkuttai Venkatachalam, Soundara Balu.

Resources: Soundara balu, Manjunath Nochikkuttai Venkatachalam.

Supervision: Soundara Balu.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjunath Nochikkuttai Venkatachalam.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate.

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venkatachalam, M., Balu, S. A review on the application of industrial waste as reinforced earth fills in mechanically stabilized earth retaining walls. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 86277–86297 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17953-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17953-x

Keywords

Navigation