Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stormwater monitoring using on-line UV-Vis spectroscopy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stormwater runoff contains a myriad of pollutants, including faecal microbes, and can pose a threat to urban water supplies, impacting both economic development and public health. Therefore, it is a necessity to implement a real-time hazard detection system that can collect a substantial amount of data, assisting water authorities to develop preventive strategies to ensure the control of hazards entering drinking water sources. An on-line UV-Vis spectrophotometer was applied in the field to collect real-time continuous data for various water quality parameters (nitrate, DOC, turbidity and total suspended solids) during three storm events in Mannum, Adelaide, Australia. This study demonstrated that the trends for on-line and comparative laboratory-analysed samples were complimentary through the events. Nitrate and DOC showed a negative correlation with water level, while turbidity and total suspended solids indicated a positive correlation with water level during the high rainfall intensity. The correlations among nitrate, DOC, turbidity, total suspended solids and water level are the opposite during low rainfall intensity. Nitrate, one of the main pollutants in stormwater, was investigated and used as a surrogate parameter for microbial detection. However, the microbiological data (Escherichia coli) from captured storm events showed poor correlations to nitrate and other typical on-line parameters in this study. This is possibly explained by the nature of the stormwater catchment outside of rain events, where the sources of bacteria and nutrients may be physically separated until mixed during surface runoff as a result of rainfall. In addition, the poor correlations among the microbiological data and on-line parameters could be due to the different sources of bacteria and nutrients that were transported to the stormwater drain where sampling and measurement were conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  • Adcock PW, Saint C (1997) Trials of Colliert System. Water-Melbourne then Artamon 24:22–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bricker SB (2007) Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation’s estuaries: a decade of change: National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment update

  • Briggs R, Melbourne K (1968) Recent advances in water quality monitoring. Water Treat. Exam 17:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito RS, Pinheiro H, Ferreira F, Matos JS, Lourenço N (2014) In situ UV-Vis spectroscopy to estimate COD and TSS in wastewater drainage systems. Urban Water J 11:261–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carreres-Prieto D, García JT, Cerdán-Cartagena F, Suardiaz-Muro J (2020) Wastewater quality estimation through spectrophotometry-based statistical models. Sensors 20:5631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Causse J, Thomas O, Jung A-V, Thomas M-F (2017) Direct DOC and nitrate determination in water using dual pathlength and second derivative UV spectrophotometry. Water Res 108:312–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chow C, Dexter R, Sutherland-Stacey L, Fitzgerald F, Fabris R, Drikas M, Holmes M, Kaeding U (2007): UV spectrometry in drinking water quality management. WATER-MELBOURNE THEN ARTARMON- 34, 63

  • Chow C, Fabris R, Dixon M (2008): Case studies using S:: CAN on-line monitoring system. Adelaide

  • Chow C, Sweet V, Adams K, Mosisch T, Shephard M, R D (2009): Implementation of a real time early warning system for water quality incidents, OzWater 09, AWA, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, Melbourne

  • Dalzell BJ, Filley TR, Harbor JM (2005): Flood pulse influences on terrestrial organic matter export from an agricultural watershed. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 110

  • Davies C, Bavor H (2000) The fate of stormwater-associated bacteria in constructed wetland and water pollution control pond systems. J Appl Microbiol 89:349–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis E, Casserly D, Moore J (1977) Bacterial relationships in stormwaters 1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 13:895–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon KS, Chanton JP (2005) Nutrient transformations between rainfall and stormwater runoff in an urbanized coastal environment: Sarasota Bay, Florida. Limnol Oceanogr 50:62–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan H (1995): A review of urban stormwater quality processes.

  • Duncan H (1999): Urban stormwater quality: a statistical overview. CRC for Catchment Hydrology

  • El Khorassani H, Theraulaz F, Thomas O (1998) Application of UV spectrophotometry to the study of treated wastewater discharges in rivers. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 26:296–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson E, Baun A, Scholes L, Ledin A, Ahlman S, Revitt M, Noutsopoulos C, Mikkelsen PS (2007) Selected stormwater priority pollutants—a European perspective. Sci Total Environ 383:41–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etheridge JR, Randolph M, Humphrey C (2019) Real-time estimates of Escherichia coli concentrations using ultraviolet-visible spectrometers. J Environ Qual 48:531–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federation WE, APH Association (2007) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC

  • Ferguson C, Husman AMdR, Altavilla N, Deere D, Ashbolt N (2003) Fate and transport of surface water pathogens in watersheds. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 33:299–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnecco I, Berretta C, Lanza L, La Barbera P (2005) Storm water pollution in the urban environment of Genoa, Italy. Atmos Res 77:60–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel P, Dierkes C, Coldewey W (2007) Storm water runoff concentration matrix for urban areas. J Contam Hydrol 91:26–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenway M, Le Muth N, Jenkins G (2002): Monitoring spatial and temporal changes in stormwater quality through a series of treatment trains. A case study—Golden Pond, Brisbane, Australia, Global Solutions for Urban Drainage, pp. 1-16

  • Gruber G, Bertrand-Krajewski J-L, Beneditis JD, Hochedlinger M, Lettl W (2006): Practical aspects, experiences and strategies by using UV/VIS sensors for long-term sewer monitoring. Water Practice and Technology 1

  • Hamilton AJ, Boland A-M, Stevens D, Kelly J, Radcliffe J, Ziehrl A, Dillon P, Paulin B (2005) Position of the Australian horticultural industry with respect to the use of reclaimed water. Agric Water Manag 71:181–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haydon S, Deletic A (2006) Development of a coupled pathogen-hydrologic catchment model. J Hydrol 328:467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Chow CW, Jin B (2016) Characterisation of dissolved organic matter in stormwater using high-performance size exclusion chromatography. J Environ Sci 42:236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James E, Joyce M (2004) Assessment and management of watershed microbial contaminants. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 34:109–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey H, Porter D, Scott G, Neet M, White D (2004) Using GIS and regression analysis to evaluate relationships between land use and fecal coliform bacterial pollution. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 298:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepot M, Torres A, Hofer T, Caradot N, Gruber G, Aubin J-B, Bertrand-Krajewski J-L (2016) Calibration of UV/Vis spectrophotometers: a review and comparison of different methods to estimate TSS and total and dissolved COD concentrations in sewers, WWTPs and rivers. Water Res 101:519–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ly DK, Maruéjouls T, Binet G, Bertrand-Krajewski J-L (2019) Application of stormwater mass–volume curve prediction for water quality-based real-time control in sewer systems. Urban Water J 16:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin MA, Johnson VL, Ensign SH (2009) Comparative impacts of stormwater runoff on water quality of an urban, a suburban, and a rural stream. Environ Monit Assess 159:475–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy D, Mitchell V, Deletic A, Diaper C (2007) Escherichia coli in urban stormwater: explaining their variability. Water Sci Technol 56:27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy D (2009) A traditional first flush assessment of E. coli in urban stormwater runoff. Water Sci Technol 60:2749–2757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy D, Hathaway J, Hunt W, Deletic A (2012) Intra-event variability of Escherichia coli and total suspended solids in urban stormwater runoff. Water Res 46:6661–6670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moin S (2021) Evaluating the benefits of near-continuous monitoring, real-time control, and SCM visibility in performance of stormwater control measures

  • Mrkva M (1975) Automatic UV-control system for relative evaluation of organic water pollution. Water Res 9:587–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nebbache S, Feeny V, Poudevigne I, Alard D (2001) Turbidity and nitrate transfer in karstic aquifers in rural areas: the Brionne Basin case-study. J Environ Manage 62:389–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri VP (1977) Microorganisms in urban stormwater, 1. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development

  • Petney T, Taraschewski H (2011) Waterborne parasitic diseases: hydrology, regional development, and control

  • Richter B, Tränckner J (2019) Balancing of COD, TSS and NO3-N loads in an urban streams by high resolution online monitoring. Novatech

  • Selvakumar A, Borst M (2006) Variation of microorganism concentrations in urban stormwater runoff with land use and seasons. J Water Health 4:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z, Chow CW, Fabris R, Liu J, Jin B (2020) Alternative particle compensation techniques for online water quality monitoring using UV–Vis spectrophotometer. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 204:104074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thayanukul P, Kurisu F, Kasuga I, Furumai H (2013) Evaluation of microbial regrowth potential by assimilable organic carbon in various reclaimed water and distribution systems. Water Res 47:225–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas O, El Khorassani H, Touraud E, Bitar H (1999) TOC versus UV spectrophotometry for wastewater quality monitoring. Talanta 50:743–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torres A, Bertrand-Krajewski J-L (2008) Partial least squares local calibration of a UV–visible spectrometer used for in situ measurements of COD and TSS concentrations in urban drainage systems. Water Sci Technol 57:581–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broeke J (2007): On-line and in situ UV/Vis spectroscopy. AWE International March, 55-59

  • Vidon P, Wagner LE, Soyeux E (2008) Changes in the character of DOC in streams during storms in two Midwestern watersheds with contrasting land uses. Biogeochemistry 88:257–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead R, Cole J (2006) Different responses to nitrate and nitrite by the model organism Escherichia coli and the human pathogen Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Portland Press Limited

  • WHO (2006) guidelines for drinking water quality, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland

Download references

Funding

This project was financially supported by the Water Quality Research Australia (Project No.1020-09) and a SA Water Capital Project for the setup the of monitoring system. The authors are grateful to Ms. Gretchen Schroeder, Water Data Service, DCM Process Control Ltd, and Water Treatment and Microbiology Research units, Australian Water Quality Centre, for technical and analytical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jianyin Huang, data analysis and manuscript writing. Christopher W. K. Chow, experimental design, data analysis and manuscript writing. Zhining Shi, data analysis and manuscript writing. Rolando Fabris, experimental design and data analysis. Amanda Mussared, experimental design and data analysis. Gary Hallas, experimental design and data analysis. Paul Monis, experimental design, data analysis and manuscript writing. Bo Jin, experimental design and data analysis. Christopher P. Saint, experiment design, data analysis and manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher W. K. Chow.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Diane Purchase

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J., Chow, C.W.K., Shi, Z. et al. Stormwater monitoring using on-line UV-Vis spectroscopy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 19530–19539 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17056-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17056-7

Keywords