Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Convergence or divergence? The effects of economic openness on low-carbon innovation in Chinese manufacturing industry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-carbon innovation can address both economic and environmental concerns; patterns of low-carbon innovation convergence can determine the effectiveness of mitigating the adverse consequences of climate change. Considering that economic openness has a huge impact on the development of innovation capability, this paper uses a conditional β convergence model to examine the convergence of low-carbon innovation in Chinese manufacturing industry and its relationship with economic openness. We incorporate the spatial spillover effect into the convergence function by constructing spatial error model, spatial lag model, and spatial Durbin model. Based on a panel data set of 30 Chinese provinces over the period 2004–2016, the results show that low-carbon innovation in Chinese manufacturing industry has a strong feature of conditional β convergence. The convergence rate of low-carbon innovation is slightly slowed down by economic openness, and the main reason is that the spillover effect is weak and the convergence rate is slow in lower open areas, so the convergence rate of the whole country is slowed down by that of the lower open areas. Although the economic openness in adjacent areas can contribute to the development of local innovation ability, but generally speaking, economic openness in local areas takes a stronger effect in promoting the convergence of low-carbon innovation than that in adjacent areas. The findings have important policy implications as they suggest the need for a more equal degree of economic openness among Chinese provinces to speed up the convergence of low-carbon innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For simplicity and readability, sometimes we just write “the low-carbon innovation” instead of “the low-carbon innovation in Chinese manufacturing industry.”

  2. Actually, we have collected the data from 2003 to 2017; however, to calculate the growth rate of low-carbon innovation and to introduce the lag terms of economic openness, R&D investment, and environmental regulation into the econometric model, the sample period is from 2004 to 2016

  3. For example, the correlation coefficient is high between the degree of economic openness and its one-year lag, as is the case for R&D investment and environmental regulation.

References

  • Aghion P et al (2012) Credit constraints and the cyclicality of r&d investment: evidence from France. J Eur Econ Assoc 10(5):1001–1024

    Google Scholar 

  • Albino V et al (2014) Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: a patent analysis. Appl Energy 135:836–854

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambos B, Ambos TC (2011) Meeting the challenge of offshoring R&D: an examination of firm- and location-specific factors. R&D Management 41(2):107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi D, Coco A (2005) Is Europe becoming the most dynamic knowledge economy in the world? J Common Mark Stud 43(3):433–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi D, Filippetti A (2011) Is the economic crisis impairing convergence in innovation performance across Europe? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49(6):1153–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Barassi MR et al (2011) The stochastic convergence of CO2 emissions: a long memory approach. Environ Resour Econ 49(3):367–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1986) Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. Am Econ Rev 76(5):1072–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla I (2009) Multinationals, technology, and the introduction of varieties of goods. J Int Econ 79(1):89–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Broitman D, Czamanski D (2021) Endogenous growth in a spatial: the impact of globalization on innovations and convergence. Int Reg Sci Rev 44(3-4):385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell J, Santangelo GD (2000) Capitalism, profits and innovation in the new techno-economic paradigm. J Evol Econ 10(1-2):131–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellani D, Pieri F (2013) R&D offshoring and the productivity growth of European regions. Res Policy 42(9):1581–1594

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen VZ, Li J, Shapiro DM (2012) International reverse spillover effects on parent firms: evidences from emerging-market MNEs in developed markets. Eur Manag J 30:204–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Shi A, Wang X (2020) Carbon emission curbing effects and influencing mechanisms of China’s emission trading scheme: the mediating roles of technique effect, composition effect and allocation effect. J Clean Prod 264:121700

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z (2016) The spatial correlation and interaction between manufacturing agglomeration and environmental pollution. Ecol Indic 2016(61):1024–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Child j, Rodrigues SB (2005) The internationalization of Chinese firms: a case for theoretical extension? Manag Organ Rev 1(3):381–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill SA et al (2018) Conditional convergence in per capita carbon emissions since 1900. Appl Energy 228:916–927

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Crespi F, Palma A (2017) Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: a patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies. Res Policy 46(4):799–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai L et al (2021) The impact of outward foreign direct investment on green innovation: the threshold effect of environmental regulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(26):34868–34884

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng P (2008) Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? J World Bus 44(1):74–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker B et al (2013) Management control and the decentralization of R&D. J Manag 39(4):906–927

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2014) Matlab software for spatial panels. Int Reg Sci Rev 37(3):389–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani E et al (2005) Upgrading in global value chains: lessons from Latin American clusters. World Dev 33(4):549–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafström J (2018) Divergence of renewable energy invention efforts in Europe: an econometric analysis based on patent counts. Environ Econ Policy Stud 20(4):829–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadalupe M, Kuzmina O, Thomas C (2012) Innovation and foreign ownership. Am Econ Rev 102(7):3594–3627

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J et al (2019) Convergence analysis of China’s energy intensity at the industrial sector level. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:7730–7742

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundley G, Jacobson CK, Park SH (1996) Effects of profitability and liquidity on R&D intensity: Japanese and U.S. companies compared. Acad Manag J 39(6):1659–1674

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivarsson I, Alvstam C, Vahlne J (2017) Global technology development by colocating R&D and manufacturing: the case of Swedish manufacturing MNEs. Ind Corp Chang 26(1):149–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik BS (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Am Econ Rev 94(3):605–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik BS, Turco AL, Maggioni D (2018) New and improved: does FDI boost production complexity in host countries? Econ J 128(614):2507–2537

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungmittag A (2006) Innovation dynamics in the EU: convergence or divergence? A cross-country panel data analysis. Empir Econ 31(2):313–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijek T et al (2021) The patterns of energy innovation convergence across European countries. Energies 14(10):2755–2755

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampel J, Bhalla A (2011) Living with offshoring: the impact of offshoring on the evolution of organizational configurations. J World Bus 46(3):346–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson L, Nobel R (1993) Determinants of foreign R&D in Swedish multinationals. Res Policy 22(5-6):397–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Szapiro M, Mao Z (2018) From global value chains (GVC) to innovation systems for local value chains and knowledge creation. Eur J Dev Res 30(3):424–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J et al (2017) Convergence of carbon intensity in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Habitat International 60:58–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H et al (2021) Spatial distribution and convergence of provincial carbon intensity in China and its influencing factors: a spatial panel analysis from 2000 to 2017. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14375-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Buck T (2007) Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Res Policy 36(3):355–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1990) Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? Am Econ Rev 80(2):92–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JA, Zander I (2007) The International Entrepreneurial Dynamics of Accelerated Internationalisation. J Int Bus Stud 38(3):387–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao C et al (2021) Spatial heterogeneity and evolution trend of regional green innovation efficiency--an empirical study based on panel data of industrial enterprises in China's provinces*. Energy Policy 156:112370

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho V et al (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions intensity of Portuguese industry and energy sectors: a convergence analysis and econometric approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:438–449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paas T, Schlitte F (2006) Regional Income Inequalities and Convergence Processes in the EU-25. HWWA Discussion Paper 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne JE, Apergis N (2021) Convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions among developing countries: evidence from stochastic and club convergence tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28(26):33751–33763

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perroux F (1950) Economic space: theory and applications. Q J Econ 64(1):89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisani N, Ricart JE (2018) Offshoring innovation to emerging countries: the effects of IP protection and cultural differences on firms’ decision to augment versus exploit home-base-knowledge. Manag Int Rev 58(6):871–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci Am 264(4):168

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ Dev Q 14(1):15–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin H, Huang Q, Zhang Z et al (2019) Carbon dioxide emission driving factors analysis and policy implications of Chinese cities: combining geographically weighted regression with two-step cluster. Sci Total Environ 2019(684):413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu Z et al (2013) R&D offshoring, technology learning and R&D efforts of host country firms in emerging economies. Res Policy 42(2):502–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Rui H, Bruyaka O (2021) Strategic network orchestration in emerging markets: China’s catch-up in the high-speed train industry. Br J Manag 32(1):97–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Rungi A, Prete DD (2018) The smile curve at the firm level: where value is added along supply chains. Econ Lett 164:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA (2019) Convergence in CO2 emissions, carbon footprint and ecological footprint: evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6167–6181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven G, Daniel S, Aidan V (2005) Clusters and intercluster spillovers: their influence on the growth and survival of Canadian information technology firms. Ind Corp Chang 14(1):27–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Su C et al (2021) Reverse innovation transfer in Chinese MNCs: The role of political ties and headquarters. J Int Manag 27(1)

  • Sun H et al (2020) Estimating environmental efficiency and convergence: 1980 to 2016. Energy 208:118224

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong CY et al (2014) Examining the patterns of innovation in low carbon energy science and technology: publications and patents of Asian emerging economies. Energy Policy 73:789–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, et al. (2021) Does regional planning policy of Yangtze River Delta improve green technology innovation? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Environmental science and pollution research international

  • Yan Z et al (2017) Convergence or divergence? Understanding the global development trend of low-carbon technologies. Energy Policy 109:499–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Liu S (2020) Spatial correlation analysis of low-carbon innovation: a case study of manufacturing patents in China. J Clean Prod 273:122893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X et al (2021) Does high-speed railway promote regional innovation growth or innovation convergence? Technol Soc 64:101472

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu S et al (2018) Convergence of carbon emissions intensity across Chinese industrial sectors. J Clean Prod 194:179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Wang B, Liu Z (2016) Carbon emissions dynamics, efficiency gains, and technological innovation in China's industrial sectors. Energy 99:10–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from incoPat database; “China Statistical Yearbook on Science and Technology”; the website of China National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Commerce of China, and China National Bureau of Statistics and Ministry of environmental protection of China; and China Stock Market & Accounting Research Database.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71964019), Applied Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province (CN) (202001AT070095), Science Research Foundation of Yunnan Education Bureau (CN) (2019Y0042).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Chaojun Yang: Supervision, Conceptualization, Methodology, Review, Funding acquisition. Liju Liu: Writing, original draft; Software; Formal analysis. Zhaoran Wang: Resources, Supervision, Validation. Lishan Liu: Writing, review and editing; Writing, major revision; Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lishan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, ., Liu, L., Wang, Z. et al. Convergence or divergence? The effects of economic openness on low-carbon innovation in Chinese manufacturing industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 14889–14902 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16819-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16819-6

Keywords

Navigation