Skip to main content
Log in

Research on remote sensing ecological environmental assessment method optimized by regional scale

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the global ecosystem has been severely disturbed by an increasing number of human activities at different scales, remote sensing technology, as an effective quantitative measure of environmental quality, has been widely used. The remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) is one of the most popular and comprehensive ecological quality assessment indices based on the remote sensing data. However, the RSEI model exhibits that the ecological environment under natural conditions is not limited by the spatial scales. In addition, the model has major shortcomings in index selection and eigenvector, which greatly limit the application of RSEI. In this paper, the RSEI model is improved and a remote sensing ecological index optimized by the regional scale (RO-RSEI) is proposed. The result of the study, conducted in Shuangyang District, Changchun City, Jilin Province, shows that the RO-RSEI model has regional ecological significance after the introduction of the scale theory of landscape ecology; the index is preferred to solve problems like the RSEI model applied mechanization and baseless index selection. Meanwhile, due to the optimization of the eigenvector contribution of the optimal index, it solves the problems like non-unique model calculation result caused by principal component analysis or even antipodal calculation result. Compared with the RSEI model, the monitoring result of RO-RSEI model can better reflect the regional ecological changes. The improved model offers the possibility of monitoring ecological environment quality with remote sensing big data and provides a scientific basis for future scholars’ batch computing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data sources used in the current research are all public data (the data sources are listed in the first section of the article).

References

  • Alcaraz-Segura D, Lomba A, Sousa-Silva R, Nieto-Lugilde D, Alves P, Georges D, Vicente JR, Honrado JP (2017) Potential of satellite-derived ecosystem functional attributes to anticipate species range shifts. Int J Appl Earth Obs 57:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai LM (2019) Evaluation and optimization of urban ecological resilience in Changchun based on landscape pattern.Master.Northeast Normal University, Changchun

  • Chander G, Markham BL, Helder DL (2009) Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remo Sens Environ 113(5):893–903

  • Chen WL, Liu YH, Guan CH, Wang JJ (2010) The discussion about the scope of ecological impact assessment. Envir Scie Manag 35(12):185–189

  • Chen Q, Hang MR, Guo Z (2020) Spatial evolution characteristics of summer surface temperature in Xian City. Map.scie 45(11):139–146

  • Crist EP (1985) A TM Tasseled cap equivalent transformation for reflectance factor data. Remo Sens Envion 17(3):301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Araujo Barbosa CC, Atkinson PM, Dearing JA (2015) Remote sensing of ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecol Indic 52:430–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dizdaroglu D, Yigitcanlar T (2012) Dawes, L.A micro-level indexing model for assessing urban ecosystem sustainability. Smar Sust Buil Envi 1(3):291–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao PW, Kasim A, Ruzi T, Zhao MC (2020) Temporal and spatial analysis of ecological environment improvement in Hami City. Arid Zone Research 37(04):1057–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey SP, Cohen WB, Yang ZQ, Krankina ON (2005) Comparison of tasseled cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection. Remote Sens Environ 97:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivits E, Buchanan G, Olsvig-Whittaker L, Cherlet M (2011) European farmland bird distribution explained by remotely sensed phenological indices. Environ Model Assess 16:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaafari S, Sakieh Y, Shabani AA, Danehkar A, Nazarisamani A (2016) Landscape change assessment of reservation areas using remote sensing and landscape metrics (case study: Jajroud reservation, Iran). Envi Deve Sust 18(6):1701–1717

  • Li C, Li XM, Tian YL, Ren R (2020a) Time and space fusion model comparison of temperature vegetation drought index. Remo Sen Tech Appl 35(04):832–844

  • Li N, Wang JY, Qin F (2020b) The improvement of ecological environment index model RSEI. Arab J Geosci 13(12):132–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XY; Zhang XX;He YR;Luan HJ (2020a) Monitoring and assessment of ecological change in coastal cities based on RSEI, XLII-3/W10:461-470

  • Liu Y, Qi JW, Lu HZ, Wang GH, Gao XY, Wang J, Zhang T (2020b) Monitoring and analysis of the change of ecological environment in Qingdao based on remote sensing technologies. Bull Surv Map 09:60–65

  • Maleky M;Razavi B 2013 Hasanfathizadeh. Land use change analysis using gis, remote sensing and landscape metrics(case study: Kermanshahcity, Iran). 34th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, (01):864–881

  • Mao ZC, Song Y, Li MM (2015) Research of the desertification in Hetao area based on MODIS inversion data. Jour Pek Univ 51(06):1102–1110

  • Marden JI (1999) Some robust estimates of principal components. Statistics & Probability Letters 43(4):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marull J, Pino J, Mallarach JM et al (2006) A land suitability index for strategic environmental assessment in metropolitan areas. Landsc Urban Plan 81(3):200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnnell MJ, MacGregor-Fors I (2016) The ecological future of cities. Science. 352:936–938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mei ZR, Li YJ, Kang X, Wei SB, Pan JJ (2019) Temporal and spatial evolution in landscape pattern of mining site area based on moving window method. Remo Sens Land Resou 31(04):60–68

  • Michael EM (2000) EMAP Overview: objectives, approaches, and achievements. Envi Moni Asse 64(1):1–8

  • Mildrexler DJ, Zhao M, Running SW (2009) Testing a MODIS global disturbance index across North America. Remote Sens Environ 113:2103–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang ZY, Wang Q, Zhang H, Zhang F, Hou P (2014) National ecosystem survey and assessment of China(2000-2010). Bull Chin Acad Sci 29:462–466

  • Pan ZH (2020) Study on ecological impact assessment of coal mining based on modify ecological index in arid desert area of northwest China. Master, China University of Geosciences, Beijing

  • Qi Tao (2007) The study of regional vegetation ecological environment quality integrative evaluation based-on remote sensing. Master. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan

  • Qiao M, Zhang YB, Yu TB (2020) Dynamic monitoring of ecological environment quality in Beijing based on remote sensing ecological index. Jour North China Univ Scie Tech 42(04):17–23

  • Rhee J, Im J, Carbone GJ (2010) Monitoring agricultural drought for arid and humid regions using multi-sensor remote sensing data. Remote Sens Environ 114:2875–2887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rukeya S, Abuduheni A, Li H, Nijat K, Li XH (2020) Dynamic monitoring and analysis of ecological environment in Fukang City vased on RSEI model. Resea Soil Wate Conser 27(01):283–289+297

  • Samuel NG, Xue YK, Kevin PC (2002) Evaluating land surface moisture conditions from the remotely sensed temperature/vegetation index measurements: an exploration with the simplified simple biosphere model. Remo Sens Envion 79(2):225–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell JA (1973) Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. Nasa Special Publication 351:309

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi SE, Wei W, Yang D, Hu X, Zhou JJ, Zhang Q (2018) Spatial and temporal evolution of eco-environmental quality in the oasis of Shiyang River Basin based on RSEDI. Chinese Journal of Ecology 37(04):1152–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi TT, Xu HQ, Wang S (2019) Derivation of tasselled cap transformation coefficients for ZY-3 MUX sensordata. J Remo Sens 23(3):514–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Song MJ, Luo YY, Duan LM (2019) Evaluation of ecological environment in the Xilin Gol steppe based on modified remote sensing ecological index model. Arid Zone Research 36(06):1521–1527

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun CJ, Zhang WQ, Li XG, Sun JL (2019) Evaluation of ecological effect of gully region of loess plateau based on remote sensing image. Trans Chin Soci Agri Engin 35(12):165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW (2004) Remotely-sensed indicators for monitoring the general condition of “natural habitat” in watersheds: an application for Delaware’s Nanticoke River watershed. Ecol Indic 4:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XF (2010) Study on eco-environmental cumulative effects in coal mining area. Doctor ,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou

  • Wang XH (2020) Evaluation of highway ecological environment impact in Tibet based on remote sensing index. Master, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin

  • Wang Y, Wang SD (2019) Dynamic change analysis of ecological quality based on RSEI: a case study of the Danjiang River Basin (Henan sectiom). Scie Soil Water Conser 17(0):57–65

  • Wang L, Wang PX, Li L, Zhang SY (2017) Winter wheat yield estimation method based on quantile regression model and remotely sensed vegetation temperature condition Index. J Agri Mach 48(07):167–173+166

  • Wang DZ, Wang SM, Huang C (2019a) Comparison of Sentinel-2 imagery with Landsat8 imagery for surface water extraction using four common water indexes. Remo Sens Land Resou 31(03):157–165

  • Wang LC, Jiao L, Lai FB, Dai PC (2019b) Study on evaluation and driving forces of ecological changes in Jinghe County, Xinjiang. J Ecol Environment 35(03):316–323

  • Wang J, Ma JL, Xie PP, Xu XJ (2020) Improvement of remote sensing ecological index in arid regions: taking Ulan Buh Desert as an example. Chin Jour Appl Ecol 31(11):3795–3804

  • Willis KS (2015) Remote sensing change detection for ecological monitoring in United States protected areas. Biol Conserv 182:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Land Ecology 19(2):125–138

  • Wu J, Meng QY, Zhan YL (2016) A measure of urban green index in urban areas based on moving window method. J Geo Scie 18(4):544–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu HQ (2005) A study on information extraction of water body with the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI). Journal of Remote Sensing 05:589–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu HQ (2013a) A remote sensing index for assessment of regional ecological changes. China Environ Sci 33(05):889–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu HQ (2013b) A remote sensing urban ecological index and its application. Acta Ecol Sin 33(24):7853–7862

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu HQ, Wang YF, Guan HD, Shi TT, Hu XS (2019) Detecting ecological changes with a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) produced time series and change vector analysis. Remote Sens 11(20):2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11202345

  • Xu JH, Zhao Y, Xiao MH, Zhong KW, Ruan HH (2018) Relationship of air temperature to NDVI and NDBI in Guangzhou City using spatial autoregressive model. Remo.Sens.Land.Resou. 30(02):186–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003) Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Inter Jour Rem Sens 24(3):583–594

  • Zhang LF, Qiao N, Baig H, Huang CP, Lv X, SUN XJ, Zhang Z (2019) Monitoring vegetation dynamics using the universal normalized vegetation index (UNVI): an optimized vegetation index-VIUPD. Remo Sens Lett 10(7)

  • Zhang YQ, Jiang F, Ji MD, Jiang HS, Wang ZY (2020) Assessment of ecological environment at district and county level based on remote sensing index. Arid Zone Research 37(06):1598–1605

  • Zhao JW, Wang KL, Ou Yang Q, Cheng QS (2011) Measurement of chlorophyll content and distribution in tea plant’s leaf using hyperspectral imaging technique. Spect Anal 31(02):512–515

  • Zhu RJ (2017) Evaluation of environment quality of Nanchang based on remote sensing based on ecological index. Master, East China University of Technology, Nanchang

  • Zhu DY, Chen T, Zhen N, Niu RQ (2020a) Monitoring the effects of open-pit mining on the eco-environment using a moving window-based remote sensing ecological index. Envi Scie Poll Reas 27(3):15716–15728

  • Zhu DY, Chen T, Niu RQ, Zhen N (2020b) Ecological environment monitoring and assessment of mining area base on moving window-based remote sensing ecological index. Geom Infor Scie:1–8

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Jilin Provincial Department of Education Project, grant numbers: JJKH201911246KJ and JJKH20191267KJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Fang Jiang, Yaqiu Zhang. Methodology: Fang Jiang, Yaqiu Zhang, Junyao Li, Zhiyong Sun. Writing: Yaqiu Zhang, Junyao Li. Visualization: Yaqiu Zhang, Junyao Li. Funding acquisition: Fang Jiang, Zhiyong Sun

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyong Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was not required for this research.

Consent to participate

The authors declare consent to participate.

Consent to publish

The authors declare consent to publish.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philipp Gariguess

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, F., Zhang, Y., Li, J. et al. Research on remote sensing ecological environmental assessment method optimized by regional scale. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 68174–68187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15262-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15262-x

Keywords

Navigation