Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimized methods for diffusive greenhouse gas flux analyses in inland waters

  • Sediment Environment, Pollution and Remediation
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inland waters are considered hotspots of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and have been extensively researched. Static chamber (STAT) and thin boundary layer (BLE) are two commonly used methods for analyzing diffusive GHG emissions from inland waters. However, the STAT method is often disturbed by GHG bubbles; meanwhile, many kinds of headspace gas are used in the BLE method, but the differences between their diffusive GHG emission analysis results are not understood. In this study, the chamber in the STAT method was modified to combat the disturbances from GHG bubbles, and the typically used gases for the BLE method, namely, pure nitrogen, air, and filtered air, were comparatively studied. Results demonstrated that the modified chamber could effectively prevent the invasion of GHG bubbles; it increased the success rate from 67 to 90% in the field test, with no obvious impacts on the results of the GHG emission analyses. The use of air and filtered air in the BLE method yielded the lower values of GHG emissions relative to pure nitrogen, and this finding was potentially attributed to the inhibition effects of the residual GHGs and high humidity in air and filtered air on the extraction of diffusive GHGs from the surface water. This study improved the commonly used methods for diffusive GHG emission analysis, and the current findings are beneficial to the study of GHG emissions from inland waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen MR, Barros VR, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, Church JA, Clarke L, Dahe Q, Dasgupta P, Dubash NK (2014) IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report-climate change 2014 synthesis report

  • Barbosa PM, Melack JM, Farjalla VF, Amaral JHF, Scofield V, Forsberg BR (2016) Diffusive methane fluxes from Negro, Solimões and Madeira rivers and fringing lakes in the Amazon basin. Limnol Oceanogr 61(S1): S221–S237

  • Bastviken D, Tranvik LJ, Downing JA, Crill PM, Enrich-Prast A (2011) Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink. Science 331:50–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann M, Lloyd D (2010) Mass spectrometric monitoring of gases (CO2, CH4, O2) in a mesotrophic peat core from Kopparås Mire, Sweden. Glob Chang Biol 7:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett MF, Moore TR (2010) Supersaturation and evasion of CO2 and CH4 in surface waters at Mer Bleue Peatland, Canada. Hydrol Process 22:2044–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broecker WS, Peng T-H (1974) Gas exchange rates between air and sea. Tellus 26:21–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butman D, Raymond PA (2011) Significant efflux of carbon dioxide from streams and rivers in the United States. Nat Geosci 4:839–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casper P, Maberly SC, Hall GH, Finlay BJ (2000) Fluxes of methane and carbon dioxide from a small productive lake to the atmosphere. Biogeochemistry 49:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DelSontro T, McGinnis DF, Sobek S, Ostrovsky I, Wehrli B (2010) Extreme methane emissions from a Swiss hydropower reservoir: contribution from bubbling sediments. Environ Sci Technol 44:2419–2425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diem T, Koch S, Schwarzenbach S, Wehrli B, Schubert C (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions (CO 2, CH 4, and N 2 O) from several perialpine and alpine hydropower reservoirs by diffusion and loss in turbines. Aquat Sci 74:619–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duchemin E, Lucotte M, Canuel R (1999) Comparison of static chamber and thin boundary layer equation methods for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from large water bodies. Environ Sci Technol 33:350–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä K-M, Ojala A, Bastviken D, Biermann T, Heiskanen JJ, Lindroth A, Peltola O, Rantakari M, Vesala T, Mammarella I (2018) Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake: comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method. Biogeosciences 15(2):429–445

  • Fedorov AV, Brierley CM, Emanuel K (2010) Tropical cyclones and permanent El Nino in the early Pliocene epoch. Nature 463:1066–1U84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juutinen S, Rantakari M, Kortelainen P, Huttunen JT, Larmola T, Alm J, Silvola J, Martikainen PJ (2009) Methane dynamics in different boreal lake types. Biogeosciences 6:209–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laurion I, Vincent WF, MacIntyre S, Retamal L, Dupont C, Francus P, Pienitz R (2010) Variability in greenhouse gas emissions from permafrost thaw ponds. Limnol Oceanogr 55:115–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wei L, Li X (2015) An improved cubic model for the mutual solubilities of CO2–CH4–H2S–brine systems to high temperature, pressure and salinity. Appl Geochem 54:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, De Kock T, Wilkinson J, Cnudde V, Xiao S, Buchmann C, Uteau D, Peth S, Lorke A (2018) Methane bubble growth and migration in aquatic sediments observed by X-ray μCT. Environ Sci Technol 52:2007–2015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Min SK, Zhang XB, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musenze RS, Werner U, Grinham A, Udy J, Yuan Z (2015) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a subtropical coastal embayment (Moreton Bay, Australia). J Environ Sci 29:82–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond PA, Hartmann J, Lauerwald R, Sobek S, McDonald C, Hoover M, Butman D, Striegl R, Mayorga E, Humborg C (2013) Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503:355–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Read JS, Hamilton DP, Desai AR, Rose KC, MacIntyre S, Lenters JD, Smyth RL, Hanson PC, Cole JJ, Staehr PA, Rusak JA, Pierson DC, Brookes JD, Laas A, Wu CH (2012) Lake-size dependency of wind shear and convection as controls on gas exchange. Geophys Res Lett 39(9):L09405

  • Roland F, Vidal LO, Pacheco FS, Barros NO, Assireu A, Ometto JP, Cimbleris AC, Cole JJ (2010) Variability of carbon dioxide flux from tropical (Cerrado) hydroelectric reservoirs. Aquat Sci 72:283–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter M, Gentz T (2008) Application of membrane inlet mass spectrometry for online and in situ analysis of methane in aquatic environments. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 19:1395–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi WQ, Chen QW, Yi QT, Yu JH, Ji YY, Hu LM, Chen YC (2017) Carbon emission from cascade reservoirs: spatial heterogeneity and mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 51:12175–12181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S (2007) Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, 4. Cambridge University Press

  • Tollefson J (2012) Heatwaves blamed on global warming. Nature 488:143–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon D, Prairie YT, Cole JJ (2010) The relationship between near-surface turbulence and gas transfer velocity in freshwater systems and its implications for floating chamber measurements of gas exchange. Limnol Oceanogr 55(4):1723–1732

  • Van Dam BR, Tobias C, Holbach A, Paerl HW, Zhu G (2018) CO2 limited conditions favor cyanobacteria in a hypereutrophic lake: an empirical and theoretical stable isotope study. Limnol Oceanogr 63(4):1643–1659

  • Varadharajan C, Hermosillo R, Hemond HF (2010) A low-cost automated trap to measure bubbling gas fluxes. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 8:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninkhof R (2014) Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean revisited. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 12:351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson AJ, Upstill-Goddard RC, Liss PS (1991) Air–sea gas exchange in rough and stormy seas measured by a dual-tracer technique. Nature 349:145–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelhofer G, Hein T (2015) Efficiency and detrimental side effects of denitrifying bioreactors for nitrate reduction in drainage water. Environ Sci Pollut R 22:13534–13545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss RF (1974) Carbon dioxide in water and seawater: the solubility of a non-ideal gas. Mar Chem 2:203–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss R, Price B (1980) Nitrous oxide solubility in water and seawater. Mar Chem 8:347–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield CJ, Aherne J, Baulch HM (2011) Controls on greenhouse gas concentrations in polymictic headwater lakes in Ireland. Sci Total Environ 410:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenburg DA, Guinasso NL Jr (1979) Equilibrium solubilities of methane, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen in water and sea water. J Chem Eng Data 24:356–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wik M, Crill PM, Varner RK, Bastviken D (2013) Multiyear measurements of ebullitive methane flux from three subarctic lakes. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 118:1307–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson J, Maeck A, Alshboul Z, Lorke A (2015) Continuous seasonal river ebullition measurements linked to sediment methane formation. Environ Sci Technol 49:13121–13129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao S, Wang Y, Liu D, Yang Z, Lei D, Zhang C (2013) Diel and seasonal variation of methane and carbon dioxide fluxes at Site Guojiaba, the Three Gorges Reservoir. J Environ Sci 25:2065–2071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao W, Liu S, Li H, Xiao Q, Wang W, Hu Z, Hu C, Gao Y, Shen J, Zhao X (2014) A flux-gradient system for simultaneous measurement of the CH4, CO2, and H2O fluxes at a lake–air interface. Environ Sci Technol 48:14490–14498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto S, Alcauskas JB, Crozier TE (1976) Solubility of methane in distilled water and seawater. J Chem Eng Data 21:78–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Lu F, Wang X, Duan X, Tong L, Ouyang Z, Li H (2013) Spatial and seasonal variability of CO2 flux at the air-water interface of the Three Gorges Reservoir. J Environ Sci 25:2229–2238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Zhang J, Chen Q, Yu W, Hu L, Shi W, Zhong J, Yan W (2018) Dramatic source-sink transition of N 2 O in the water level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir during flooding-drying processes. Environ Sci Pollut R:1–9

  • Yvon-Durocher G, Montoya JM, Woodward G, Jones JI, Trimmer M (2011) Warming increases the proportion of primary production emitted as methane from freshwater mesocosms. Glob Chang Biol 17:1225–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang L, Xie X, Huang L, Wu Y (2013) Effects of invasion of Spartina alterniflora and exogenous N deposition on N2O emissions in a coastal salt marsh. Ecol Eng 58:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Qin B, Zhou J, Van Dam B, Shi W (2018) Effects of turbulence on carbon emission in shallow lakes. J Environ Sci 69:166–172

Download references

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41701112).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenqing Shi or Boqiang Qin.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 129 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Yu, J., Van Dam, B. et al. Optimized methods for diffusive greenhouse gas flux analyses in inland waters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 25870–25876 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06436-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06436-9

Keywords

Navigation