Skip to main content
Log in

Pollutant removal performance of an integrated system that combines a baffled vertical-flow wetland and a scenic water body

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stormwater treatment requires effective control measures and development of low-cost and high-efficiency technologies. An integrated system is developed by combining a baffled vertical-flow constructed wetland (BVFCW) and a scenic water body for stormwater quality control purpose. The objectives of the study are to compare the pollutant removal performance of the full-scale integrated system with four groups of wetland-to-scenic water body area ratios (WSARs) including 1/11, 2/11, 3/11, 4/11 and investigate its treatment efficiency. Results show that the system performs better in the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), ammonia nitrogen (NH4+–N), nitrate-nitrogen (NO3–N), and total phosphorus (TP) at the WSAR of 4/11 than that at 3/11 in sixteen-day operation, while it reaches the highest total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency of 74.0% at the WSAR of 2/11 due to relatively rich carbon source and high influent TN concentration. The integrated system may prove the most effective COD removal at the WSAR of 4/11 for four-time aerobic/anaerobic alternating conditions, a longer flow path and more time to contact with substrates, although the influent COD is lower than that at 2/11 and 1/11. After sixteen-day operation, BVFCW achieved COD removal rate of 90.3%, NH4+–N removal rate of 85.7%, NO3–N removal rate of 68.6%, and TP removal rate of 52.5% at the WSAR of 4/11. At the WSAR of 1/11, effluent met the Class IV requirements in Chinese standards after one-week operation, while effluent met the Class III requirements under the rest conditions. Since effluent in all WSARs met the standards, WSARs of 1/11 and 2/11 were recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adyel TM, Oldham CE, Hipsey MR (2016) Stormwater nutrient attenuation in a constructed wetland with alternating surface and subsurface flow pathways: event to annual dynamics. Water Res 107:66–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila C, Matamoros V, Reyescontreras C, Piña B, Casado M, Mita L et al (2014) Attenuation of emerging organic contaminants in a hybrid constructed wetland system under different hydraulic loading rates and their associated toxicological effects in wastewater. Sci Total Environ 470-471(2):1272–1280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J, Palmer SE (1995) Restoration of urban waterways and vacant areas: the first steps toward sustainability. Environ Health Perspect 103(5):452–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calero S, Segura M, Rojo C, Rodrigo MA (2015) Shifts in plankton assemblages promoted by free water surface constructed wetlands and their implications in eutrophication remediation. Ecol Eng 74(74):385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao W, Wang Y, Sun L, Jiang J, Zhang Y (2016) Removal of nitrogenous compounds from polluted river water by floating constructed wetlands using rice straw and ceramsite as substrates under low temperature conditions. Ecol Eng 88:77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai H, Gong H, Shen S, Li S, Zou B, Li L, et al (2014). Integrated system for treating and recycling rainwater. US 20140124424 A1

  • Chen X, Huang X, He S, Yu X, Sun M, Wang X, Kong H (2013) Pilot-scale study on preserving eutrophic landscape pond water with a combined recycling purification system. Ecol Eng 61(19):383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Ivanoff D, Pietro K (2015) Long-term phosphorus removal in the everglades stormwater treatment areas of South Florida in the United States. Ecol Eng 79:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conn RM, Fiedler FR (2006) Increasing hydraulic residence time in constructed stormwater treatment wetlands with designed bottom topography. Water Environ Res 78(13):2514–2523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du L, Trinh X, Chen Q, Wang C, Wang H, Xia X et al (2017) Enhancement of microbial nitrogen removal pathway by vegetation in integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands (ivcws) for treating reclaimed water. Bioresour Technol 249:644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Zhang B, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Liu F, Guo Y, Wu H (2013) Intermittent aeration strategy to enhance organics and nitrogen removal in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour Technol 141:117–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hua G, Kong J, Ji Y, Li M (2017) Influence of clogging and resting processes on flow patterns in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ

  • Hughes RM, Dunham S, Maas-Hebner KG, Yeakley JA, Schreck C, Harte M, Molina N, Shock CC, Kaczynski VW, Schaeffer J (2014) A review of urban water body challenges and approaches: (1) rehabilitation and remediation. Fisheries 39(1):18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khiadani HM, Zarrabi M, Foroughi M (2013) Urban runoff treatment using nano-sized iron oxide coated sand with and without magnetic field applying. J Environ Health Sci Eng 11(1):43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles PR, Griffin P, Davies PA (2010) Complementary methods to investigate the development of clogging within a horizontal sub-surface flow tertiary treatment wetland. Water Res 44(1):320–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Land M, Granéli W, Grimvall A, Hoffmann CC, Mitsch WJ, Tonderski KS et al (2013) How effective are created or restored freshwater wetlands for nitrogen and phosphorus removal: a systematic review protocol. Environ Evid 2(1):16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Gai Z, Cui D, Ma F, Yang J, Zhang X, Sun Y, Ren N (2012) Genome sequence of a highly efficient aerobic denitrifying bacterium, pseudomonas stutzeri t13. J Bacteriol 194(20):5720–5720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Lu L, Zheng X, Ngo HH, Liang S, Guo W, Zhang X (2014) Enhanced nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands: effects of dissolved oxygen and step-feeding. Bioresour Technol 169(5):395–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Chi Z, Yan B, Cheng L, Li J (2016) Nitrogen removal in wood chip combined substrate baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: impact of matrix arrangement and intermittent aeration. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(5):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian L, Revitt M, Ellis B (2017) An impact assessment for urban stormwater use. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YF, Jing SR, Lee DY, Chang YF, Chen YM, Shih KC (2005) Performance of a constructed wetland treating intensive shrimp aquaculture wastewater under high hydraulic loading rate. Environ Pollut 134(3):411–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R, Babatunde AO (2017) Influence of key design and operating variables on dynamics of pollutant removal in experimental stormwater constructed wetlands. J Environ Eng 143(7):04017015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma F, Sun Y, Li A, Zhang X, Yang J (2015) Activation of accumulated nitrite reduction by immobilized pseudomonas stutzeri, t13 during aerobic denitrification. Bioresour Technol 187:30–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maltais-Landry G, Maranger R, Brisson J, Chazarenc F (2009) Nitrogen transformations and retention in planted and artificially aerated constructed wetlands. Water Res 43:535–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matamoros V, Salvadã V (2012) Evaluation of the seasonal performance of a water reclamation pond-constructed wetland system for removing emerging contaminants. Chemosphere 86(2):111–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moortel AMKVD, Meers E, Pauw ND, Tack FMG (2010) Effects of vegetation, season and temperature on the removal of pollutants in experimental floating treatment wetlands. Water Air Soil Pollut 212(1–4):281–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen XC, Chang SW, Nguyen TL, Ngo HH, Kumar G, Banu JR et al (2018) A hybrid constructed wetland for organic-material and nutrient removal from sewage: process performance and multi-kinetic models. J Environ Manag 101:378–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie M et al (2001) The technical assessment handbook for ecological residence of China. China Architecture& Building Press

  • Olguín EJ, Sánchez-Galván G, Melo FJ, Hernández VJ, González-Portela RE (2017) Long-term assessment at field scale of floating treatment wetlands for improvement of water quality and provision of ecosystem services in a eutrophic urban pond. Sci Total Environ 584–585:561–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney RC, Carli C, Bayley SE (2013) River connectivity affects submerged and floating aquatic vegetation in floodplain wetlands. Wetlands 33(6):1165–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed T, Sun G (2012) A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J Environ Manag 112(24):429–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samsó R, Garcia J (2013) Bio_pore, a mathematical model to simulate biofilm growth and water quality improvement in porous media: application and calibration for constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 54(54):116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEPA (2002) Chinese environmental quality standards for surface water (GB3838-2002). State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPA), Bei Jing

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Feng L, Li A, Zhang X, Yang J, Ma F (2017) Ammonium assimilation: an important accessory during aerobic denitrification of pseudomonas stutzeri t13. Bioresour Technol 234:264–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CC, Kadlec RH (2003) Oxygen flux implications of observed nitrogen removal rates in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands. Water Sci Technol 48(5):191–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tee HC, Lim PE, Seng CE, Nawi MA (2012) Newly developed baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetland for the enhancement of nitrogen removal. Bioresour Technol 104(1):235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thongtha S, Teamkao P, Boonapatcharoen N, Tripetchkul S, Techkarnjararuk S, Thiravetyan P (2014) Phosphorus removal from domestic wastewater by nelumbo nucifera, gaertn, and Cyperus alternifolius. J Environ Manag 137(4):54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2004) The use of best management practices (BMPs) in urban watersheds. EPA, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohla C, Kõiv M, Bavor HJ, Chazarenc F, Mander Ü (2011) Filter materials for phosphorus removal from wastewater in treatment wetlands—a review. Ecol Eng 37(1):70–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walaszek M, Bois P, Laurent J, Lenormand E, Wanko A (2018) Urban stormwater treatment by a constructed wetland: seasonality impacts on hydraulic efficiency, physico-chemical behavior and heavy metal occurrence. Sci Total Environ 637-638:443–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei T, Wijesiri B, Jia Z, Li Y, Goonetilleke A (2018) Re-thinking classical mechanistic model for pollutant build-up on urban impervious surfaces. Sci Total Environ 651(Pt 1):114–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss PT, Asce M, Gulliver JS, Asce F, Erickson AJ, Asce SM (2007) Cost and pollutant removal of storm-water treatment practices. J Water Resour Plan Manag 133(3):218–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wosiack PA, Lopes DD, Damianovic MHRZ et al (2015) Removal of COD and nitrogen from animal food plant wastewater in an intermittently-aerated structured-bed reactor. J Environ Manag 154:145–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie H, Yang Y, Liu J, Kang Y, Zhang J, Hu Z, Liang S (2018) Enhanced triclosan and nutrient removal performance in vertical up-flow constructed wetlands with manganese oxides. Water Res 143:457–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yahoo Maps (2018) Access: September, 2018. Available at: https://maps.yahoo.com/beta

  • Yan Y, Xu J (2014) Improving winter performance of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in northern China: a review. Wetlands 34:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare SO, Saghafian B, Shamsai A (2012) Multi-objective optimization for combined quality–quantity urban runoff control. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(12):4531–4542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F, Xi S, Yang X, Yang W, Li J, Gu B, He Z (2012) Purifying eutrophic river waters with integrated floating island systems. Ecol Eng 40(3):53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong F, Wu J, Dai Y et al (2015) Bacterial community analysis by PCRDGGE and 454-pyrosequencing of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands with front aeration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:1499–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the other members of our group, who gave us advice and suggestions regarding this work, for their selfless contributions.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Water Pollution Control and Remediation of China: Storm-water Management for Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Research and Demonstration Project (Grant No. 2010ZX07320-001), and the National Key R&D program of China (Grant 2017YFC0404704).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongxiang Chai.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chai, H., Li, W., Shao, Z. et al. Pollutant removal performance of an integrated system that combines a baffled vertical-flow wetland and a scenic water body. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 269–281 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3507-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3507-8

Keywords

Navigation