Abstract
In order to investigate the impact of the sludge interchange ratio (IR) on both the sludge reduction process and the carbon and nutrient removal efficiencies, an anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) at 20 °C and − 400 mV was operated for 300 days coupled to a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for urban wastewater treatment. It was found that a 100% interchange rate, corresponding to an anaerobic solid retention time (SRTASSR) of 2.5 days, was the most suitable case in terms of sludge reduction and wastewater treatment process, achieving a 66% sludge reduction compared to a control system simulated as an SBR. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonium nitrogen, total nitrogen, and phosphate removal efficiencies of 86.1 ± 7.2, 82.5 ± 11.2, 81.7 ± 12.0, and 62.6 ± 15.0%, respectively, were achieved. When the interchange rate was increased, more ammonium nitrogen and soluble extracellular polymeric substance concentrations were released in the ASSR. This implies that cell lysis and hydrolysis of particulate organic matter in the ASSR were processes of fundamental importance with the increasing mass of sludge cycled to the ASSR. Compared to the release of ammonia, soluble COD release was detected to a lesser extent, due to its consumption by microorganisms in the ASSR. There was also a simultaneous increase in slow-growing microorganisms which use organic carbon for metabolic activities, above all sulfate-reducing bacteria and denitrifying phosphate-accumulating organisms. This increase contributed significantly to sludge reduction in the SBR–ASSR system.







Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Change history
28 November 2017
The correct Fig. 1 is shown in this paper.
References
APHA, AWWA, WEF, 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Am Public Health Assoc
van den Bosch PLF, van Beusekom OC, Buisman CJN, Janssen AJH (2007) Sulfide oxidation at halo-alkaline conditions in a fed-batch bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 97:1053–1063
Chen G-H, An K-J, Saby S, Brois E, Djafer M (2003) Possible cause of excess sludge reduction in an oxic-settling-anaerobic activated sludge process (OSA process). Water Res 37:3855–3866. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00331-2
Cheng C, Zhou Z, Niu T, An Y, Shen X, Pan W, Chen Z, Liu J (2017) Effects of side-stream ratio on sludge reduction and microbial structures of anaerobic side-stream reactor coupled membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol 234:380–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.077
Chon D-H, Park C (2012) Method to reduce sludge generation in wastewater treatment systems. US20120152812 A1
Chon DH, Rome M, Kim H-S, Park C (2011a) Investigating the mechanism of sludge reduction in activated sludge with an anaerobic side-stream reactor. Water Sci Technol 63:93–99
Chon DH, Rome M, Kim YM, Park KY, Park C (2011b) Investigation of the sludge reduction mechanism in the anaerobic side-stream reactor process using several control biological wastewater treatment processes. Water Res 45:6021–6029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.051
Chudoba P, Morel A, Capdeville B (1992) The case of both energetic uncoupling and metabolic selection of microorganisms in the OSA activated sludge system. Environ Technol 13:761–770
Coma M, Rovira S, Canals J, Colprim J (2013) Minimization of sludge production by a side-stream reactor under anoxic conditions in a pilot plant. Bioresour Technol 129:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.055
Cyganecka A, Podedworna J, Żubrowska-sudoł M (2011) Analysis of methods for determining DPAO fraction in phosphorus accumulating organisms. Polish J Environ Stud 20:303–309
Datta T, Liu Y, Goel R (2009) Evaluation of simultaneous nutrient removal and sludge reduction using laboratory scale sequencing batch reactors. Chemosphere 76:697–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.040
DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
Ferrentino R, Langone M, Andreottola G, Rada EC, (2014) An anaerobic side-stream reactor in wastewater treatment: a review. 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC141212
Ferrentino R, Langone M, Gandolfi I, Bertolini V, Franzetti A, Andreottola G (2016a) Shift in microbial community structure of anaerobic side-stream reactor in response to changes to anaerobic solid retention time and sludge interchange ratio. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.07
Ferrentino R, Langone M, Merzari F, Tramonte L, Andreottola G (2016b) A review of anaerobic side-stream reactor for excess sludge reduction: configurations, mechanisms and efficiency. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:382–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.1096879
Ferrentino R, Langone M, Ancdreottola G (2017) Temperature effects on the activity of denitrifying phosphate accumulating microorganisms and sulphate reducing bacteria in anaerobic side-stream reactor. J Environ Bio Res 1 (1)
Foladori P, Andreottola G, Ziglio G (2010) Sludge reduction technologies in wastewater treatment plants. IWA Publishing
Frolund B, Griebe T, Nielsen PH (1995) Enzymatic activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:755–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050481
Goel RK, Noguera DR (2006) Evaluation of sludge yield and phosphorus removal in a cannibal solids reduction process. 1331–1337
Guglielmi G, Saroj DP, Chiarani D, Andreottola G (2007) Sub-critical fouling in a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment: experimental investigation and mathematical modelling. Water Res 41:3903–3914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.047
Hu ZR, Wentzel MC, Ekama G a (2002) Anoxic growth of phosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) in biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems. Water Res 36:4927–4937. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00186-0
Hu JY, Ong SL, Ng WJ, Lu F, Fan XJ (2003) A new method for characterizing denitrifying phosphorus removal bacteria by using three different types of electron acceptors. Water Res 37:3463–3471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00205-7
Khursheed A, Sharma MK, Tyagi VK, Khan AA, Kazmi AA (2015) Specific oxygen uptake rate gradient—another possible cause of excess sludge reduction in oxic-settling-anaerobic (OSA) process. Chem Eng J 281:613–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.105
Lens PNL, Vissera A, Janssena AJH, Hulshoff Pola LW, Lettingaa G (1998) Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 28:41–88
Li B, Wu G (2014) Effects of sludge retention times on nutrient removal and nitrous oxide emission in biological nutrient removal processes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:3553–3569. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110403553
Metcalf & Eddy (2013) Wastewater engineering: treatment and resource recovery, 5th edn. AECOM, Los Angeles
Novak JT, Sadler ME, Murthy SN (2003) Mechanisms of floc destruction during anaerobic and aerobic digestion and the effect on conditioning and dewatering of biosolids. Water Res 37:3136–3144
Novak JT, Chon DH, Curtis B-A, Doyle M (2007) Biological solids reduction using the cannibal process. Water Environ Res 79:2380–2386. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143007X183862
Pérez-Elvira SI, Nieto Diez P, Fdz-Polanco F (2006) Sludge minimisation technologies. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 5:375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-005-5728-9
Ragazzi M, Rada EC, Ferrentino R (2015) Analysis of real-scale experiences of novel sewage sludge treatments in an Italian pilot region. Desalination Water Treat 55(3):783–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.932717
Saby S, Djafer M, Chen GH (2003) Effect of low ORP in anoxic sludge zone on excess sludge production in oxic-settling-anoxic activated sludge process. Water Res 37:11–20
Semblante GU, Hai FI, Ngo HH, Guo W, You SJ, Price WE, Nghiem LD (2014) Sludge cycling between aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic regimes to reduce sludge production during wastewater treatment: performance, mechanisms, and implications. Bioresour Technol 155:395–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.029
Seviour RJ, Mino T, Onuki M (2003) The microbiology of biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:99–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00021-4
Sheng G-P, Yu H-Q, Li X-Y (2010) Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: a review. Biotechnol Adv 28:882–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.001
Sid S, Volant A, Lesage G, Heran M (2017) Cost minimization in a full-scale conventional wastewater treatment plant: associated costs of biological energy consumption versus sludge production. Water Sci Technol wst2017423. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.423
Sun L, Randall CW, Novak JT (2010) The influence of sludge interchange times on the oxic-settling-anoxic process. Water Environ Res 82:519–523. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143009X12487095236711
Torregrossa M, Di Bella G, Di Trapani D (2012) Comparison between ozonation and the OSA process: analysis of excess sludge reduction and biomass activity in two different pilot plants. Water Sci Technol 66:185–192
Wang J, Zhao Q, Jin W, Lin J (2008) Mechanism on minimization of excess sludge in oxic-settling- anaerobic (OSA) process. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. 2(1):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-008-0001-4
Wei Y, Van Houten RT, Borger AR, Eikelboom DH, Fan Y (2003) Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 37:4453–4467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00441-X
Ye F, Zhu R, Li Y (2008) Effect of sludge retention time in sludge holding tank on excess sludge production in the oxic-settling-anoxic ( OSA ) activated sludge process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 114:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb
Zhou Z, Hu D, Jiang L, Xing C, Zhu Y, Jiang M (2015a) Nitrification kinetics of a full-scale anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic wastewater treatment plant. Desalination Water Treat 56:2054. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.958105
Zhou Z, Qiao W, Xing C, An Y, Shen X, Ren W, Jiang L, Wang L (2015b) Microbial community structure of anoxic–oxic-settling-anaerobic sludge reduction process revealed by 454-pyrosequencing. Chem Eng J 266:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.095
Zhou Z, Qiao W, Xing C, Wang C, Jiang L-M, Gu Y, Wang L (2015c) Characterization of dissolved organic matter in the anoxic–oxic-settling-anaerobic sludge reduction process. Chem Eng J 259:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.129
Acknowledgments
The first author is grateful for the financial support of the Fondazione Caritro, Trento (Research Project and Economic Development, Grant 2016). The second author was funded by a grant from the Fondazione Caritro, Trento (Young Researcher, Grant 2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Gerald Thouand
The correct Fig. 1 is shown in this paper.
The original version of this article was revised.
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0805-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrentino, R., Langone, M., Villa, R. et al. Strict anaerobic side-stream reactor: effect of the sludge interchange ratio on sludge reduction in a biological nutrient removal process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 1243–1256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0448-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0448-6