Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of control strategies for single-stage partial nitrification-anammox granular sludge reactor for mainstream sewage treatment—a model-based evaluation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The low ammonium concentration, low temperature, presence of organic matter, and large variation of influent ammonium load pose serious challenges for the application of PN/AMX (partial nitrification-anammox) reactor in the mainstream wastewater treatment. Previous mathematical simulation studies of PN/AMX granule reactor mainly concentrated on the steady-state modeling. The steady-state simulation cannot be used for developing control strategies under dynamic condition. In this study, four control strategies were evaluated on their abilities to minimize the impact of feed disturbances on autotrophic nitrogen removal in mainstream wastewater. The four control strategies included are the following: (A) direct airflow adjustment to maintain the fixed NH4 + set point, (B) fixed NH4 + set point control manipulated by DO concentration with DO limit, (C) constant DO control strategy, and (D) adaptive change of NH4 + set point control based on the feed disturbance (NH4 + set point value achieved by DO concentration manipulation with DO limit). The results indicated that the control strategy A successfully implemented for high NH4 + strength wastewater treatment cannot be directly transferred into the mainstream wastewater treatment, in which high NO2 accumulation was resulted during the NH4 + peaks at the low-temperature period. Satisfactory TN removal could be achieved by maintaining either fixed or variable bulk NH4 + set point values calculated based on the feed disturbances (control strategies B and D). The DO limit imposed on the DO concentration manipulation to derive the desired NH4 + set point values was essential for the successful implementation of control strategies B and D. The control strategy C with constant DO concentration was not feasible for the PN/AMX process under dynamic feed disturbances. The control simulation results and the control variable sensitivity analysis indicated that the NH4 + concentration was a better control variable than the DO concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abma WR, Driessen W, Haarhuis R, van Loosdrecht MC (2010) Upgrading of sewage treatment plant by sustainable and cost-effective separate treatment of industrial wastewater. Water Sci Technol 61(7):1715–1722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alex J, Benedetti L, Copp JB, Gernaey KV, Jeppsson U, Nopens I, Pons MN, Rieger L, Rosen C and Steyer JP (2008) Benchmark simulation. Model no. 1 (BSM1), IWA task group on benchmarking of control strategies for WWTPs. Tech Rep

  • Cao Y, van Loosdrecht MCM, Daigger GT (2017) Mainstream partial nitritation–anammox in municipal wastewater treatment: status, bottlenecks, and further studies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(4):1365–1383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crank J (1984) Free and moving boundary problem. Clarendon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernaey KV, Jeppsson U, Vanrolleghem PA, Copp JB (2014) Benchmarking of control strategies for wastewater treatment plants. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao X, Heijnen JJ, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2002) Model-based evaluation of temperature and inflow variations on a partial nitrification-ANAMMOX biofilm process. Water Res 36(19):4839–4849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M (2000) Activated sludge models: ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetten MSM, Horn SJ, van Loosdrecht MCM (1997) Towards a more sustainable municipal wastewater treatment system. Water Sci Technol 35(9):171–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joss A, Derlon N, Cyprien C, Burger S, Szivak I, Traber J, Siegrist H, Morgenroth E (2011) Combined nitritation–anammox: advances in understanding process stability. Environ Sci Technol 45(22):9735–9742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kartal B, Kuenen JG, van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Sewage treatment with anammox. Science 328(5979):702–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lackner S, Gilbert EM, Vlaeminck SE, Joss A, Horn H, van Loosdrecht MCM (2014) Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences—an application survey. Water Res 55:292–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laureni M, Weissbrodt DG, Szivák I, Robin O, Nielsen JL, Morgenroth E, Joss A (2015) Activity and growth of anammox biomass on aerobically pre-treated municipal wastewater. Water Res 80:325–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laureni M, Falås P, Robin O, Wick A, Weissbrodt DG, Nielsen JL, Ternes TA, Morgenroth E, Joss A (2016) Mainstream partial nitritation and anammox: long-term process stability and effluent quality at low temperatures. Water Res 101:628–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MW, Park JM (2007) One-dimensional mixed-culture biofilm model considering different space occupancies of particulate components. Water Res 41(19):4317–4328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Sun S, Badgley BD, Sung S, Zhang H, He Z (2016) Nitrogen removal by granular nitritation-anammox in an upflow membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Water Res 94:23–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Yang D, Chen W, Gu X (2017) High-throughput sequencing-based microbial characterization of size fractionated biomass in an anoxic anammox reactor for low-strength wastewater at low temperatures. Bioresour Technol 231:45–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lotti T, Kleerebezem R, Hu Z, Kartal B, Jetten MSM, van Loosdrecht MCM (2014) Simultaneous partial nitritation and anammox at low temperature with granular sludge. Water Res 66:111–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio-Iglesias M, Vangsgaard AK, Gernaey KV, Smets BF, Sin G (2015) A novel control strategy for single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal in SBR. Chem Eng J 260:64–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf and Eddy (2002) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. McGraw-Hill

  • Ni B-J, Chen Y-P, Liu S-Y, Fang F, Xie W-M, Yu H-Q (2009) Modeling a granule-based anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (ANAMMOX) process. Biotechnol Bioeng 103(3):490–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez J, Lotti T, Kleerebezem R, Picioreanu C, van Loosdrecht MCM (2014) Outcompeting nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in single-stage nitrogen removal in sewage treatment plants: a model-based study. Water Res 66:208–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reino C, Carrera J (2017) Low-strength wastewater treatment in an anammox UASB reactor: effect of the liquid upflow velocity. Chem Eng J 313:217–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist H, Salzgeber D, Eugster J, Joss A (2008) Anammox brings WWTP closer to energy autarky due to increased biogas production and reduced aeration energy for N-removal. Water Sci Technol 57(3):383–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sliekers AO, Derwort N, Gomez JLC, Strous M, Kuenen JG, Jetten MSM (2002) Completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite in one single reactor. Water Res 36(10):2475–2482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smitshuijzen J, Pérez J, Duin O, Loosdrecht MCMV (2016) A simple model to describe the performance of highly-loaded aerobic COD removal reactors. Biochem Eng J 112:94–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Dongen U, Jetten MS, van Loosdrecht MC (2001) The SHARON-anammox process for treatment of ammonium rich wastewater. Water Sci Technol 44(1):153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hulle SWH, Vandeweyer HJP, Meesschaert BD, Vanrolleghem PA, Dejans P, Dumoulin A (2010) Engineering aspects and practical application of autotrophic nitrogen removal from nitrogen rich streams. Chem Eng J 162(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangsgaard AK, Mauricio-Iglesias M, Gernaey KV, Sin G (2014) Development of novel control strategies for single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal: a process oriented approach. Comput Chem Eng 66:71–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wanner O, Gujer W (1986) A multispecies biofilm model. Biotechnol Bioeng 28(3):314–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wanner O, Reichert P (1996) Mathematical modeling of mixed-culture biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 49(2):172–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wett B (2006) Solved upscaling problems for implementing deammonification of rejection water. Water Sci Technol 53(12):121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J. Wu acknowledges the high-end talent program provided by Yangzhou University, China.

Funding

The study is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 51478410).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Bingcai Pan

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 106 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J. Comparison of control strategies for single-stage partial nitrification-anammox granular sludge reactor for mainstream sewage treatment—a model-based evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 25839–25848 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0230-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0230-9

Keywords

Navigation