Abstract
The environmental impact assessment of mining sites represents nowadays a large interest topic in Romania. Historical pollution in the Rosia Montana mining area of Romania caused extensive damage to environmental media. This paper has two goals: to investigate the environmental pollution induced by mining activities in the Rosia Montana area and to quantify the environmental impacts and associated risks by means of an integrated approach. Thus, a new method was developed and applied for quantifying the impact of mining activities, taking account of the quality of environmental media in the mining area, and used as case study in the present paper. The associated risks are a function of the environmental impacts and the probability of their occurrence. The results show that the environmental impacts and quantified risks, based on quality indicators to characterize the environmental quality, are of a higher order, and thus measures for pollution remediation and control need to be considered in the investigated area. The conclusion drawn is that an integrated approach for the assessment of environmental impact and associated risks is a valuable and more objective method, and is an important tool that can be applied in the decision-making process for national authorities in the prioritization of emergency action.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baciu C (2007) The environmental impact of acid rock drainage. Environ Prog 11:19–24 (in Romanian)
Bird G, Brewer PA, Macklin MG, Serban M, Balteanu D, Driga B (2005) Heavy metal contamination in the Aries river catchment, western Romania: implications for development of the Rosia Montana gold deposit. J Geochem Explor 86:26–48. doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2005.02.002
Breitholtz M, Rudén C, Hansson SO, Bengtsson BE (2006) Ten challenges for improved ecotoxicological testing in environmental risk assessment. Ecotox Environ Safe 63(2):324–335. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.12.009
Burger J (2008) Environmental management: integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands. Sci Total Environ 400:6–19. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.041
Ferreira AP, Cunha CLN, Kling ASM (2008) Environmental Evaluation Model for Water Resource Planning. Study case: Piabanha Hydrographic Basin, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Revista Eletrônica do Prodema UFC, 2:7–18.
Florea RM, Stoica AI, Baiulescu GE, Capota P (2005) Water pollution in gold mining industry: a case study in Rosia Montana district, Romania. Environ Geol 48:1132–1136
Forray F (2002) Environmental Pollution in the Aries River Catchment Basin. Case study: Rosia Montana Mining Exploitation. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Geologia 1:189–198
Forray F, Hallbauer DK (2000) A study of the pollution of the Aries River (Romania) using capillary electrophoresis as analytical technique. Environ Geol 39(12):1372–1384
G.D. (2005) Governmental decision No. 352/2005 (OJ 398, 11.05.2005) amending G.D. no. 188/2002 (OJ 187, 20.03.2002) for the approval of norms concerning the conditions of discharging the wastewater into the aquatic environment
Giger W, Panin N (2009) ESTROM, Environmental Science and Technology in Romania—programme overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-009-0202-9
Horaicu C, Florea F, Stumbea D (2005) The assessment of environmental impact and risk induced by mining activities in the Fundu Moldovei mining area. Suceava county Environment & Progress 5:219–224 (in Romanian)
Kuitunen M, Jalava K, Hirvonen K (2007) Testing the usability of the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) method for comparison of EIA and SEA results. Environ Impact Asses. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.06.004
Leopold L, Clarke F, Hanshaw B, Balsley J (1971) A procedure for evaluating the environmental impact. Geological Survey circular 645. Washington, USA.
Levei E, Senila M, Miclean M, Bela A, Roman C, Ştefănescu L, Moldovan OT (2011) Influence of Rosia Poieni and Rosia Montana mining areas on the water quality of the Aries river. Environ Eng Manag J 10(1):23–29
Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Steevens J, Ferguson E, Pleus R (2007) Multicriteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res. doi:10.10007/s11051-007-9211-0
M.O. (1997) Ministerial Order 756/1997 of the Ministry of Water, Forests and Environmental Protection for the approval of Regulations regarding the environmental pollution assessment, published in Official Gazette no. 303 bis of November 6, 1997.
M.O. (2006) Ministerial Order 161/2006 of the Ministry of Environment and Water Management for the approval of the normative regarding surface water quality classification, in order to establish the ecological state of water bodies, published in Official Gazette no. 511 of June 13, 2006.
Ozunu A, Ştefănescu L, Costan C, Miclean M, Modoi C, Vlad SN (2009) Surface water pollution generated by mining activities. Case study: Aries River Middle Catchment Basin, Romania. Environ Eng Manag J 8(4):809–815
Robu B, Macoveanu M (2005) Integration of risk assessment into environmental impact assessment procedure—case study for steel processing. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Rhodes Island, Greece, 1–3 September. A-1262-A-1267.
Robu B, Macoveanu M (2010) Environmental assessments for sustainable development. EcoZone Iasi [in Romanian]
Robu B, Petruc V, Macoveanu M (2005) Integrated environmental impact and risk assessment of emissions resulted from oil distribution. Environ Eng Manag J 4(4):499–513
Robu B, Căliman AF, Beţianu C, Gavrilescu M (2007) Methods and procedures for environmental risk assessment. Environ Eng Manag J 6(6):573–592
Sandham L, Pretorius H (2007) A review of EIA report quality in the North West province of South Africa. Environ Impact Asses. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.07.002
Semenzin E, Critto A, Marcomini A, Rutgers M (2007) DSS-ERAMANIA: a decision support site-specific ecological risk assessment of contaminated sites. In: Hull RN, Barbu CH, Goncharova N (eds) Strategies to enhance environmental security in transition countries, NATO Security through, Science Series—C: Environmental Security. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 35–46
STAS 12574–87 (1987) Air of protected zones. Quality requirements.
Ştefănescu L, Al O, Vlad SN (2010) Mining-induced land use and landscape changes in Rosia Montana metallogenetic field during the last 90 years. AES Bioflux 2(1):1–9
Ştefănescu L, Constantin V, Surd V, Al O, Vlad SN (2011) Assessment of soil erosion potential by the USLE method in Rosia Montana mining area and associated NATECH events. Carpath J Earth Env 6(1):35–42
Suditu GD, Robu BM (2012) Digitization of the environmental impact quantification process. Environ Eng Manag J 11(4):841–848
Swanson SM (2007) A process for focusing cleanup actions at contaminated sites: lessons learned from remote northern sites in Canada. In: Hull RN, Barbu CH, Goncharova N (eds) Strategies to enhance environmental security in transition countries, NATO Security through, Science Series—C: Environmental Security. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 201–214
Zobrist J, Sima M, Dogaru D, Senila M, Yang H, Popescu C, Roman C, Bela A, Frei L, Dold B, Balteanu D (2009) Environmental and socioeconomic assessment of impacts by mining activities—a case study in the Certej River catchment, Western Carpathians, Romania. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-008-0068-2
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support (consisting of experimental data) provided by the Mining Branch RosiaMin and the Romanian Waters National Administration. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful review and suggestions that helped improve the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Stuart Simpson
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ştefănescu, L., Robu, B.M. & Ozunu, A. Integrated approach of environmental impact and risk assessment of Rosia Montana Mining Area, Romania. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 7719–7727 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1528-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1528-x