Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Canopy-cover thematic-map generation for Military Map products using remote sensing data in inaccessible areas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landscape and Ecological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Canopy cover is one of the most important elements in concealing military structures and enemy reconnaissance. In this study, we propose an algorithm for automatic generation of density measure of percent canopy cover, which is an attribute of the digital Military Map product, using high-resolution satellite images of inaccessible areas. The thematic mapping process of canopy cover can be divided into image classification, segmentation, and texture analysis. QuickBird and SPOT-5 high-resolution images are classified using Landsat images and military maps. Then, forested areas are extracted from the classified images, and closing and opening operations are executed through morphology filtering. The extracted region is divided into unit-zone objects using a segmentation technique, and the percentage of canopy cover of each object is categorized as one of four levels (0–25, 26–50, 51–75, 76–100%). Two methods were used to establish the percentage of canopy cover for each segment: the discriminant method, using statistical analysis, and the classified canopy ratio method, which calculates the percentage of forest in the segment. The discriminant method showed 48% (QuickBird) and 61% (SPOT-5) accuracy and classified canopy ratio method showed 71% (QuickBird) and 87% (SPOT-5) accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bharati MH, Liu JJ, MacGregor JF (2004) Image texture analysis: methods and comparisons. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 72:57–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butusov OB (2003) Textural classification of forest types from Landsat 7 imagery. GISci Remote Sens 40:91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo C, Chollett I, Klein E (2008) Enhanced duckweed detection using bootstrapped SVM classification on medium resolution RGB MODIS imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29:5595–5604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen DM, Stow D (2003) Strategies for integrating Information from multiple spatial resolutions into land-use/land-cover classification routines. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:1279–1287

    Google Scholar 

  • Clause DA, Zhao Y (2003) Grey level co-occurrence integrated algorithm (GLCIA): a superior computational method to rapidly determine co-occurrence probability texture features. Comput Geosci 29(7):837–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleve C, Kelly M, Kearns FR, Moritz M (2008) Classification of the wildland-urban interface: a comparison of pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution aerial photography. Comput Environ Urban 32:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis CH, Wang X (2002) Urban land cover classification from high resolution multi-spectral IKONOS imagery. In: Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2002. IGARSS ’02 IEEE International, pp 1204–1206

  • Defense Mapping Agency (1989) Performance specification Vector Product Interim Terrain Data (VITD). MIL-PRF-89040A

  • Elmqvist B, Ardo J, Olsson L (2008) Land use studies in drylands: an evaluation of object-oriented classification of very high resolution panchromatic imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29:7129–7140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin SE, Peddle DR (1990) Classification of SPOT HRV imagery and texture features. Int J Remote Sens 11:551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin SE, Hall RJ, Smith L, Gerylo GR (2003) Discrimination of conifer height, age, and crown closure classes using Landsat-5 TM imagery in the Canadian Northwest Territories. Int J Remote Sens 24:1823–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl MA, McIve DK, Hodges JCF, Zhang XY, Muchoney D, Strahler AH, Woodcock CE, Gopal S, Schneider A, Cooper A, Baccini A, Gao F, Schaaf C (2002) Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sens Environ 83:287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerylo GR, Hall RJ, Franklin SE, Smith L (2002) Empirical relations between Landsat TM spectral response and forest stands near Fort Simpson, Northwest Territories, Canada. Can J Remote Sens 28:68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong P, Marceau DJ, Howarth PJ (1992) A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land-use classification with SPOT HRV data. Remote Sens Environ 40:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL (2003) Digital image processing using MATLAB. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyot G (1990) Optical properties of vegetation canopies. In: Steven MD, Clark JA (eds) Applications of remote sensing in agriculture. Butterworth, London, pp 19–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Han KS, Champeaux JL, Roujean JL (2004) A land cover classification product over France at 1 km resolution using SPOT4/VEGETATION data. Remote Sens Environ 92:52–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MC, Defries RS, Townshend JRG, Sohlberg R (2000) Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. Int J Remote Sens 21:1331–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3:610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D (1999) Assessing forest canopies and understory illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry 72:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2002) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaichang D, Deren L, Deyi L (2000) Remote sensing image classification with GIS data based on spatial data mining techniques. Geo-Spatial Inf Sci 3(4):30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuchel J, Naumann S, Heiler M, Siegmund A (2003) Automatic land cover analysis for Tenerife by supervised classification using remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 86:530–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Cho D (2005) Status and ecological resource value of the Republic of Korea’s De-militarized Zone. Landsc Ecol Eng 1:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen L, Korhonen KT, Rautiainen M, Stenberg P (2006) Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fenn 40:577–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Weng Q (2005) Urban classification using full spectral information of Landsat ETM+ imagery in Marion County, Indiana. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 71:275–1284

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Hart MM, Redmond RL (2001) Mapping vegetation across large geographic areas: integration of remote sensing and GIS to classify multisource data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67:295–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Maillard P (2003) Comparing texture analysis methods through classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau DJ, Howarth PJ, Dubois JM, Gratton DJ (1990) Evaluation of the grey-level co-occurrence matrix method for land-cover classification using SPOT imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maselli F, Conese C, Petkov L, Resti R (1992) Inclusion of prior probabilities derived from a nonparametric process into the maximum likelihood classifier. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 58:201–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu R, Freeman C, Aryal J (2007) Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery. Landsc Urban Plan 81:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munroe DK, Nagendra H, Southworth J (2007) Monitoring landscape fragmentation in an inaccessible mountain area: Celaque National Park, Western Honduras. Landsc Urban Plan 83:154–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na X, Zhang S, Li X, Yu H, Liu C (2010) Improved land cover mapping using random forests combined with landsat thematic mapper imagery and ancillary geographic data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 76:833–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann O (1993) Automated forest cover mapping using thematic mapper images and ancillary data. Appl Geogr 13:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA, Mepherson EG, Sisnni SM, Kerkmann P, Stevens CJ (1996) Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landsc Urban Plan 36:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto K, Yamakawa S, Kawashima H (1998) Estimation of flood damage to rice production in North Korea in 1995. Int J Remote Sens 19:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir I, Norton DA, Ozkan UY, Mert A, Senturk O (2008) Estimation of tree size diversity using object oriented texture analysis and aster imagery. Sensors 8:4709–4724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podest E, Saatchi S (2002) Application of multiscale texture in classifying JERS-1 radar data over tropical vegetation. Int J Remote Sens 23:1487–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricchetti E (2000) Multispectral satellite image and ancillary data integration for geological classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66:429–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador R, Pons X (1998) On reliability of Landsat TM for estimating forest variables by regression techniques: a methodological analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36:1888–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki T, Imanishi J, Ioki K, Morimoto Y, Kitada K (2008) Estimation of leaf area index and canopy openness in broad-leaved forest using an airborne laser scanner in comparison with high-resolution near-infrared digital photography. Landsc Ecol Eng 4:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaban MA, Dikshit O (2001) Evaluation of the merging of SPOT multispectral and panchromatic data for classification of an urban environment. Int J Remote Sens 23:565–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AM, Edmisten KL, Wells R, Collins GD (2007) Measuring canopy coverage with digital imaging. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 38:895–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su W, Li J, Chen Y, Liu Z, Zhang J, Low TM, Suppiah I, Hashim SAM (2008) Textural and local spatial statistics for the object-oriented classification of urban areas using high resolution imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29:3105–3117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas N, Hendrix C, Congalton RG (2003) A comparison of urban mapping methods using high-resolution digital imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:963–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter V (1998) Automatic classification of remote sensing data for GIS database revision. In: ISPRS commission IV symposium on GIS—between visions and applications, 1998. IAPRS, pp 641–648

  • Xu Y, Prather JW, Hampton HM, Aumack EN, Dickson BG, Sisk TD (2006) Advanced exploratory data analysis for mapping regional canopy cover. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72:31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan G, Mas JF, Maathuis BHP, Xiangmin Z, Dijk PMV (2006) Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches—a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Remote Sens 27:4039–4055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2001) Texture-integrated classification of urban treed areas in high-resolution color-infrared imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67:1359–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Huang G, Troy A, Cadenasso ML (2009) Object-based land cover classification of shaded areas in high spatial resolution imagery of urban areas: a comparison study. Remote Sens Environ 113:1769–1777

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the faculty research fund of Konkuk University in 2008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Daehak-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, South Korea

    Anjin Chang, Yongmin Kim & Yongil Kim

  2. Department of Advanced Technology Fusion, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-701, South Korea

    Yangdam Eo & Sunwoong Kim

Authors
  1. Anjin Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yangdam Eo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sunwoong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongmin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yongil Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangdam Eo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, A., Eo, Y., Kim, S. et al. Canopy-cover thematic-map generation for Military Map products using remote sensing data in inaccessible areas. Landscape Ecol Eng 7, 263–274 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0132-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0132-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation