Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Pressure on Fluid Damping in MEMS Torsional Resonators with Flow Ranging from Continuum to Molecular Regime

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High quality factor of dynamic structures at micro and nano scale is exploited in various applications of micro electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) and nano electro-mechanical system. The quality factor of such devices can be very high in vacuum. However, when vacuum is not desirable or not possible, the tiny structures must vibrate in air or some other gas at pressure levels that may vary from atmospheric to low vacuum. The interaction of the surrounding fluid with the vibrating structure leads to dissipation, thus bringing down the quality factor. Depending on the ambient fluid pressure or the gap between the vibrating and the fixed structure, the fluid motion can range from continuum flow to molecular flow giving a wide range of dissipation. The relevant fluid flow characteristics are determined by the Knudsen number which is the ratio of the mean free path of the gas molecule to the characteristic flow length of the device. This number is very small for continuum flow and reasonably big for molecular flow. In this paper, we study the effect of fluid pressure on the quality factor by carrying out experiments on a MEMS device that consists of a double gimbaled torsional resonator. Such devices are commonly used in optical cross-connects and switches. We only vary fluid pressure to make the Knudsen number go through the entire range of continuum flow, slip flow, transition flow, and molecular flow. We experimentally determine the quality factor of the torsional resonator at different air pressures ranging from 760 Torr to 0.001 Torr. The variation of this pressure over six orders of magnitude ensures required rarefaction to range over all flow conditions. Finally, we get the variation of quality factor with pressure. The result indicates that the quality factor, Q, follows a power law, Q ∝P –r , with different values of the exponent r in different flow regimes. In the second part of the paper, we propose the use of effective viscosity for considering velocity slip conditions in solving Navier–Stokes equation numerically. This concept is validated with analytical results for a simple case and then compared with the experimental results presented in this paper. The study shows that the effective viscosity concept can be used effectively even for the molecular regime if the air-gap to length ratio is sufficiently small (h 0/L<0.01). As this ratio increases, the range of validity decreases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Craighead HG (2000) Nanoelectromechanical systems. Science 290(5496):1532–1535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ilic B, Yang Y, Craighead HG (2004) Virus detection using naoelectromechanical devices. Appl Phys Lett 85(1313): 2604–2606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verbridge SS, Parpia JM, Reichenbach RB, Bellan LM, Craighead HG (2006) High quality factor resonance at room temperature with nanostrings under high tensile stress. J Appl Phys 99:124304–124308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blom FR, Bouwstra S, Elwenspoek M, Fluitman JHJ (1992) Dependence of the quality factor of micromachined silicon beam resonators on pressure and geometry. J Vac Sci Tech B 10(1):19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Langlois WE (1962) Isothermal squeeze films. Q Appl Math 20(2):131–150.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Griffin WS, Richardsen HH, Yamamami S (1966) A study of fluid squeeze film damping. J Basic Eng 88:451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blech JJ (1983) On isothermal squeeze films. J Lubr Technol 105:615–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan F, Kubby J, Peeters E, Tran AT, Mukherjee S (1998) Squeeze film damping effect on the dynamic response of a MEMS torsion mirror. J Micromechanics Microengineering 8:200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang K-M, Lee S-C, Li S-H (1999) Squeeze film damping effect on a MEMS torsion mirror. J Micromechanics Microengineering 9(1):89–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Minikes A, Bucher I, Avivi G (2005) Damping of a micro-resonator torsion mirror in rarefied gas ambient. J Micromechanics Microengineering 15:1762–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang JM, Liu AQ, Deng ZL, Zhang QX, Ahn J, Asundi A (2004) An approach to the coupling effect between torsion and bending for electrostatic torsional micromirrors. Sens Actuators A Phys 115:159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou G, Tay FEH, Chau FS (2003) Macro-modelling of a double-gimbaled electrostatic torsional micromirror. J Micromechanics Microengineering 13:532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arkilic EB, Breuer KS (1993) Gaseous flow in small channels. AIAA Pap 93:3270-1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arkilic EB, Breuer KS, Schmidt MA (2001) Mass flow and tangential momentum accommodation in silicon micromachined channels. J Fluid Mech 437:29–43.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Colin S (2005) Rarefaction and compressibility effects on steady and transient gas flows in microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 1:268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kogan MN (1969) Rarified gas dynamics. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sharipov F (1999) Non-isothermal gas flow through rectangular microchannels. J Micromechanics Microengineering 9:394–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bird GA (1996) Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beskok A, Karniadakis GE (1999) A model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales. Microscale Thermophys Eng 3(1):43–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Batchelor GK (1997) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pan LS, Liu GR, Lam KY (1999) Determination of slip coefficient for rarefied gas flows using direct simulation Monte Carlo. J Micromechanics Microengineering 9(1):89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Piekos ES, Breuer KS (1996) Numerical modeling of micromechanical devices using the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. J Fluids Eng 118:464–469.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharipov F, Seleznev V (1998) Data on internal rarefied gas flows. J Phys Chem Ref Data 27(3):657–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cercignani C (1998) The boltzmann equation and its application. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li W-L (1999) Analytical modeling of ultra-thin gas squeeze film. Nanotechnology 10(4):440–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karniadakis GE, Beskok A (2001) Micro flows: fundamental and simulation. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bhatnagar P, Gross K, Krook K (1954) A model for collision processes in gasses. Phys Rev 94:511–524.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Cercignani C, Illner R, Pulvirenti M (1994) The mathematical theory of dilute gases, vol. 106. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Grad H (1949) On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases. Commun Pure Appl Math 2:331–407.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Veijola T, Pursula A, Ráback P (2005) Extending the validity of squeezed-film damper models with elongations of surface dimensions. J Micromechanics Microengineering 15:1624–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pandey AK, Pratap R, Chau FS (2007) Analytical solution of modified Reynolds equation in perforated MEMS structures. Sens Actuators A Phys 135:839–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pandey AK, Pratap R (2007) A comparative study of analytical squeeze film damping models in rigid rectangular perforated MEMS structures with experimental results. Microfluid Nanofluid, doi:10.1007/s10404-007-0165-4.

  33. Rao SS (1995) Mechanical vibration. Wesley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mohanty P, Harrington DA, Ekinci KL, Yang YT, Murphy MJ, Roukes ML (2002) Intrinsic dissipation in high-frequency micromechanical resonators. Phys Rev B 66:085416-1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CranesSci MEMS Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India

    A. K. Pandey & R. Pratap

  2. Microsystems Technology Initiative, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260, Singapore

    F. S. Chau

Authors
  1. A. K. Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Pratap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. S. Chau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pandey, A.K., Pratap, R. & Chau, F.S. Effect of Pressure on Fluid Damping in MEMS Torsional Resonators with Flow Ranging from Continuum to Molecular Regime. Exp Mech 48, 91–106 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9076-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9076-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation