Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to evaluate the validation of ApneaLink™ Plus (ALP) based on a large number of subjects in a prospective design.
Method
We recommended enrolling of 200 consecutive patients who had been referred because of habitual snoring or witnessed apnea during sleep. If consent was obtained, patients underwent standard polysomnography (PSG) and ALP evaluation simultaneously at the hospital (ALPlab), and repeated ALP at home (ALPhome) within 1 month. The parameters of ALP were scored based on three different systems, Manual, Auto AASM, and Auto scoring systems.
Result
Among the 200 patients who were recommended for enrollment, 149 completed the study. Sensitivity was good for all three scoring systems, while specificity was poor for the Auto scoring system. The area under curve was highest for the manual scoring system and lowest for the auto scoring system, and increased as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cutoff value increased from 5 to 30. Regarding agreement with PSG, the manual scoring system was most superior, followed by the Auto AASM, and Auto scoring systems. The degree of agreement between PSG and ALP was affected by sleep efficiency and the arousal index. Moderate agreement between PSG and ALP based on central apnea index was observed.
Conclusion
ALP is an accurate and reliable device for the diagnosis of OSA. Manual scoring is recommended; however, Auto AASM is also acceptable. ALP detects central sleep apnea to a certain degree. Both sleep efficiency and the arousal index affect the results of ALP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eckert DJ, Malhotra A (2008) Pathophysiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5:144–153
Aurora RN, Casey KR, Kristo D et al (2010) Practice parameters for the surgical modifications of the upper airway for obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep 33:1408–1413
Senaratna CV, Perret JL, Lodge CJ, et al. (in press) Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in the general population: a systematic review. Sleep Med Rev.
Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ et al (2012) Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 8:597–619
Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B et al (2007) Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 3:737–747
Chesson AL Jr, Berry RB, Pack A et al (2003) Practice parameters for the use of portable monitoring devices in the investigation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep 26:907–913
Dawson A, Loving RT, Gordon RM et al (2010) Type III home sleep testing versus pulse oximetry: is the respiratory disturbance index better than the oxygen desaturation index to predict the apnoea-hypopnoea index measured during laboratory polysomnography. BMJ Open 5(6):e007956
Lesser DJ, Haddad GG, Bush RA, Pian MS (2012) The utility of a portable recording device for screening of obstructive sleep apnea in obese adolescents. J Clin Sleep Med 8:271–277
Fredheim JM, Røislien J, Hjelmesæth J (2014) Validation of a portable monitor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in morbidly obese patients. J Clin Sleep Med 10(7):751–757
Nigro CA, Dibur E, Malnis S, Grandval S, Nogueira F (2013) Validation of ApneaLink ox™ for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 17:259–266
Oktay B, Rice TB, Atwood CW Jr et al (2011) Evaluation of a single-channel portable monitor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 7:384–390
BaHammam AS, Sharif M, Gacuan DE, George S (2011) Evaluation of the accuracy of manual and automatic scoring of a single airflow channel in patients with a high probability of obstructive sleep apnea. Med Sci Monit 17:MT13–MT19
Ragette R, Wang Y, Weinreich G, Teschler H (2010) Diagnostic performance of single airflow channel recording (ApneaLink) in home diagnosis of sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 14:109–114
Ng SS, Chan TO, To KW et al (2009) Validation of a portable recording device (ApneaLink) for identifying patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Intern Med J 39:757–762
Chen H, Lowe AA, Bai Y, Hamilton P, Fleetham JA, Almeida FR (2009) Evaluation of a portable recording device (ApneaLink) for case selection of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 13(3):213–219
Erman MK, Stewart D, Einhorn D, Gordon N, Casal E (2007) Validation of the ApneaLink for the screening of sleep apnea: a novel and simple single-channel recording device. J Clin Sleep Med 3:387–392
Levendowski DJ, Zack N, Rao S et al (2009) Assessment of the test-retest reliability of laboratory polysomnography. Sleep Breath 13:163–167
Chediak AD, Acevedo-Crespo JC, Seiden DJ, Kim HH, Kiel MH (1996) Nightly variability in the indices of sleep-disordered breathing in men being evaluated for impotence with consecutive night polysomnograms. Sleep 19:589–592
ApneaLink™ Plus white paper (http://www.resmed.com/ap/dam/documents/articles/ApneaLink_Plus_White_Paper.pdf)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was supported by a grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HC15C3415). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
This was a prospective study conducted at the Ajou University Hospital and was approved by the internal review board (AJIRB-DEV-DE2-14-102) of the Ajou University Hospital and registered in the Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0002098). We received the written informed consent from all the patient who were enrolled to this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, J.H., Kim, H.J. Validation of ApneaLink™ Plus for the diagnosis of sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 21, 799–807 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1532-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1532-3