Skip to main content
Log in

Network Coding Based Distributed Indoor Target Tracking Using Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of indoor target tracking using wireless sensor networks. To facilitate ease of deployment and keeping the cost to a minimum we focus on devising a target tracking system based on received signal strength indicator (RSSI) measurements. We adopt a model based approach in which the targets are assumed to evolve in time according to a certain maneuver model and the deployed sensors record RSSI measurements governed by an appropriate observation model. To devise an accurate target tracking algorithm, that would account for the radio environment, we use mixed maximum likelihood (ML)-Bayesian framework. Under this framework the radio environment is estimated using the ML approach and the target tracking is accomplished using a Bayesian filtering technique namely, particle filtering. Next to create a distributed tracking algorithm which warrants that every sensor node has access to RSSI measurements of all the other sensor nodes we introduce a dissemination mechanism for the same based on the technique of random linear network coding (RLNC). In this technique every sensor node encodes RSSI measurements that it has received from other nodes (including its own) to create a network coded packet, which in turn is transmitted using the carrier-sense multiple access based access mechanism. Our simulation results demonstrate that the root mean square tracking error (RMSE) obtained by using RLNC is strictly lower than what was achieved with a competing scheme based on localized aggregation. This can be attributed to the rapid dissemination capability of the RLNC technique. Further, the growth of RMSE in a strongly connected network with noise variance was found to be much slower than in the case of a weakly connected network. This points to the potential of RLNC in improving tracking performance, especially in strongly connected networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One can consider using other criteria as well. For example one can consider maximizing a-posterior PDF of \({\mathbf {s}}^{t}\) given \({\mathbf {y}}^{1},\ldots , {\mathbf {y}}^{t}\), resulting in (conditional) modal estimates of \({\mathbf {s}}^{t}\).

  2. In general sampling from the desired PDF is not possible in general and therefore one chooses to sample from what is known as an importance sampling function.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boukerche, A., Oliveira, H. A. B. F., Nakamura, E. F., & Loureiro, A. A. F. (2007). Localization systems for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 14(6), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kushki, A., & Plataniotis, K. (2010). Nonparametric techniques for pedestrian tracking in wireless local area networks. In: S. Haykin, K. J. R. Liu (Eds.), Handbook on Array Processing and Sensor Networks (pp. 783–803). doi:10.1002/9780470487068.ch25.

  4. Yin, J., Yang, Q., & Ni, L. M. (2008). Learning adaptive temporal radio maps for signal-strength-based location estimation. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(7), 869–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kushki, A., Plataniotis, K., & Ventesanopoulos, A. N. (2007). Kernel-based positioning in wireless local area networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(6), 689–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kushki, A., Plataniotis, K., & Ventesanopoulos, A. N. (2010). Intelligent dynamic radio tracking in indoor wireless local area networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 9(3), 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng, C., Au, W. S. A., Valaee, S., & Tan, Z. (2012). Received-signal-strength-based positioning using compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 11(12), 1983–1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oka, A., & Lampe, L. (2010). Distributed target tracking using signal strength measurements by a wireless sensor network. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 28(7), 1006–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, G., & Yang, K. (2011). A new approach to sensor node localization using RSS measurements in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(5), 1389–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul, A. S., & Wan, E. A. (2009). RSSI based indoor localization and tracking using sigma-point Kalman smoothers. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 3(5), 860–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahlswede, R., Cai, N., Li, S., & Yeung, R. (2000). Network information flow. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(4), 1204–1216.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, S., Yeung, R., & Cai, N. (2003). Linear network coding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 49(2), 371–381.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho, T., Medard, M., Koetter, R., Karger, D. R., Effros, M., Shi, J., et al. (2006). A random linear network coding approach to multicast. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(10), 4413–4430.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Koetter, R., & Medard, M. (2003). An algebraic approach to network coding. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 49(2), 782–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chou, P. A., & Wu, Y. (2007). Network coding for internet and wireless networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(5), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Firooz, M., & Roy, S. (2013). Data dissemination in wireless networks with network coding. IEEE Communication Letters, 17(5), 944–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patwari, N., Ash, J. N., Kyperountas, S., Hero, A. O, I. I. I., & Correal, N. S. (2005). Locating the nodes: Cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 22(4), 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arulampalam, M., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., & Clapp, T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2), 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson, B. D. O., & Moore, J. B. (1979). Optimal filtering. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Doucet, A., Godsill, S., & Andrieu, C. (2000). On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering. Journal of Statistics and Computing, 10(3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39, 1–38.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Science and Engineering Research Board (Grant No. SR/FTP/ETA-85/2009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laxminarayana S. Pillutla.

Additional information

The author would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology (DST) of India for their research support under the FAST track scheme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pillutla, L.S. Network Coding Based Distributed Indoor Target Tracking Using Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 96, 3673–3691 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4069-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4069-7

Keywords

Navigation