Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decomposition of Cost Efficiency Into Persistent and Transient Efficiency in the Provision of Water Services: Evidence from England and Wales

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance assessments of water utilities are essential to protect the interests of citizens, because utilities operate under natural monopolies and their costs are recovered from customers through water tariffs. In this study, a four-error component model was applied to estimate cost efficiency (CE), persistent efficiency (PE) and transient efficiency (TE) for a sample of English and Welsh water utilities over 25 years (1993–2018). This approach economies of scale and technical change of the water utilities to be estimated. The average estimated CE was 0.703, indicating that water utilities could reduce costs by almost 30% for the same production. Average PE and TE were 0.875 and 0.805, respectively, indicating that the privatization of the water industry positively impacted the efficiency of water utilities. The analysis also showed that the UK industry exhibited decreasing economies of scale, whereby mergers did not cause lower production costs. Technical regression was present, but minimal. Through linking, CE, TE and PE with the regulatory cycle, the impact of the different regulatory policies on the performance of water utilities in England and Wales was shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due they were developed from primary sources of data but are available from the corresponding author on reason.

References

  • Badunenko O, Kumbakhar S (2017) Economies of scale, technical change and persistent and time-varying cost efficiency in Indian banking: Do ownership, regulation and heterogeneity matter? Eur J Oper Res 260:789–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg S, Marques R (2011) Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: A benchmarking literature survey. Water Policy 13(5):591–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottasso A, Conti M (2009) Scale economies, technology and technical change: Evidence from the English water only sector. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39(2):138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brea-Solis H, Perelman S, Saal DS (2017) Regulatory incentives to water losses reduction: The case of England and Wales. J Prod Anal 47(3):259–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho P, Marques RC (2011) The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities. J Environ Manag 92(10):2698–2707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho P, Marques RC, Berg S (2012) A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure. Util Policy 21:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetrulo TB, Marques RC, Malheiros TF (2019) An analytical review of the efficiency of water and sanitation utilities in developing countries. Water Res 161:372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T, Rao P, O’Donnell CJ, Battese G (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd ed. Springer, New York

  • Cunha M, Marques J, Savić D (2020) A flexible approach for the reinforcement of water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis. Water Resour Manag 34(14):4469–4490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbetta F, Cave M (2007) Regulation and efficiency incentives: Evidence from the England and Wales water and sewerage industry. Rev Netw Econ 6(4):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fungacova Z, Klein PO, Weill L (2020) Persistent and transient inefficiency: Explaining the low efficiency of Chinese big banks. China Econ Rev 59:101368

  • Goh KH, See KF (2021) Twenty years of water utility benchmarking: A bibliometric analysis of emerging interest in water research and collaboration. J Clean Prod 284:124711

  • Guerrini A, Romano G, Leardini C (2018) Economies of scale and density in the Italian water industry: A stochastic frontier approach. Util Policy 52:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurung K, Tang WZ, Sillanpää M (2018) Unit energy consumption as benchmark to select energy positive retrofitting strategies for finnish wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs): A case study of mikkeli WWTP. Environ Process 5(3):667–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmati A, Kumbhakar SC, Kim J (2018) Persistent and transient efficiency of international airlines. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 2(18):213–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov LS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econom 19:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Lien G (2017) Yardstick regulation of electricity distribution -disentangling short-run and long-run inefficiencies. Energy J 38(5):17–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Lien G, Hardaker JB (2014) Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: A study of Norwegian grain farming. J Prod Anal 41:321–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Phillips MA (2017) The influence of the regulatory environment on Chinese urban water utilities. Water Resour Manag 31(1):205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manouseli D, Kayaga SM, Kalawsky R (2019) Evaluating the effectiveness of residential water efficiency initiatives in England: Influencing factors and policy implications. Water Resour Manag 33(7):2219–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques RC (2011) Regulation of water and wastewater services: An international comparison. IWA publishing

  • Marques RC, Berg S, Yane S (2014) Nonparametric benchmarking of Japanese water utilities: Institutional and environmental factors affecting efficiency. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(5):562–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini G, Scotti D, Viola D, Vittadini G (2020) Persistent and temporary inefficiency in airport cost function: An application to Italy. Transp Res Part A 132:999–1019

    Google Scholar 

  • Maziotis A, Saal DS, Thanassoulis E, Molinos-Senante M (2015) profit change and its drivers in the english and welsh water industry: Is output quality important? Water Policy 20(5):995–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Maziotis A (2018) Assessing the influence of exogenous and quality of service variables on water utilities´ performance using a true-fixed stochastic frontier approach. Urban Water J 15(7):682–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (1994) Future charges for water and sewerage services. Office of Water Services, Birmingham

  • Ofwat (1999) Future water and sewerage charges 2000–2005: Final determinations. Office of Water Services, Birmingham

  • Ofwat (2004) Future water and sewerage charges 2005–10: Final determinations. Office of Water Services, Birmingham. Available from: http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/pricereview/pr04/det_pr_fd04.pdf

  • Ofwat (2009) Future water and sewerage charges 2010–15: Final determinations. Protecting consumers, promoting value, safeguarding the future. Office of Water Services, Birmingham. Available from: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150603201359/https://www.ofwat.gov.uk/pricereview/pr09phase3/det_pr09_finalfull.pdf

  • Pinto FS, Simoes P, Marques RC (2017) Water services performance: Do operational environment and quality factors count? Urban Water J 14(8):773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porcher S, Maziotis A, Molinos-Senante M (2017) The welfare costs of non-marginal water pricing: Evidence from the water only utilities in England and Wales. Urban Water J 14(9):947–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saal DS, Parker D (2001) Productivity and price performance in the privatized water and sewerage utilities of England and Wales. J Regul Econ 20(1):61–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See KF (2015) Exploring and analyzing sources of technical efficiency in water supply services: Some evidence from southeast Asian public water utilities. Water Resour Econ 9:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titus MA, Vamosiu A, McClure KR (2017) Are public master’s institutions cost efficient? A stochastic frontier and spatial analysis. Res High Educ 58:469–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villegas A, Molinos-Senante M, Maziotis A (2019) Impact of environmental variables on the efficiency of water utilities: A double bootstrap approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(30):31014–31025

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica Y Ambiental, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avda. Vicuña Mackenna, 4860, Santiago, Chile

    Maria Molinos-Senante & Alexandros Maziotis

  2. Departamento de Matemáticas Para La Economía Y La Empresa, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Tarongers S/N, Valencia, Spain

    Maria Molinos-Senante

Authors
  1. Maria Molinos-Senante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandros Maziotis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MMS: Conceptualization; data curation; supervision; Writing—review & editing. AM: Investigation; methodology; Software; Writing—original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Molinos-Senante.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This manuscript has been developed in compliance with Ethical Standards.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molinos-Senante, M., Maziotis, A. Decomposition of Cost Efficiency Into Persistent and Transient Efficiency in the Provision of Water Services: Evidence from England and Wales. Water Resour Manage 36, 1849–1862 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03111-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03111-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation