Correction to: Water Resour Manag

Fig. 1
figure 1

The model, which is used in Vensim® model

Fig. 2
figure 2

Consequences of implementation of Scenarios (Aher et al. 1991) 6 on: a Water that should be supplied by Tehran water sources, b Subsidy that should be paid by water suppliers

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Per capita domestic water that is needed to be consumed in Scenario 17, b difference between per capita domestic water that is needed to be consumed in Scenario 17 and sustainably available domestic water, c amount of NRW, d income of water companies, e overall cost of domestic water

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02428-z

The original version of this article unfortunately contains mistakes introduced during the publishing process.

In Figure 1 and all of the panels of figures 2 and 3 were incorrect. The corrected figures are shown on the next page.

In the last sentence of section 4.1 (the best scenario) should be modified as follow:

“As both criteria in scenario 16 are less than the other scenarios in total period of study, scenario 17 is proposed as the best scenario out all.” should be “As both criteria in scenario 16 are less than the other scenarios in the total period of study, scenario 16 is proposed as the best scenario out of all.”