Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Water Resour Manag
The original version of this article unfortunately contains mistakes introduced during the publishing process.
In Figure 1 and all of the panels of figures 2 and 3 were incorrect. The corrected figures are shown on the next page.
In the last sentence of section 4.1 (the best scenario) should be modified as follow:
“As both criteria in scenario 16 are less than the other scenarios in total period of study, scenario 17 is proposed as the best scenario out all.” should be “As both criteria in scenario 16 are less than the other scenarios in the total period of study, scenario 16 is proposed as the best scenario out of all.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02428-z
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karimlou, K., Hassani, N., Mehrabadi, A.R. et al. Correction to: Developing a Model for Decision-Makers in Dynamic Modeling of Urban Water System Management. Water Resour Manage 34, 2621–2623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02478-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02478-3